• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Squad Wants More Security

Oh good grief. Imagine if Trump had said;

“If you see anybody from “the Squad” in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she added.

Ala Maxine Waters. This is all just theater designed to make it appear that the Broad Squad is just these poor people picked on by Trump for no reason at all.
 
Last edited:
Winston said:
precisely because nut jobs who can't get healthcare they need but can get guns they don't need, is why they need an armed detail.
Click to expand...

That's why law abiding citizens right keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
 
apdst said:
Armed security, no doubt, but they don't want us to own guns. This further destroy's the Left's gun control logic.

Extra protection sought for certain lawmakers after Trump'''s comments about '''squad''' | Fox News
Click to expand...

I'd like to see this letter from Thompson to Stenger. I'm curious whether Thompson actually singled out Trump's remarks as the reason for the possible need for extra security...as the article's spin suggests.

However, I won't hold my breath while waiting. The media doesn't have a very good record in providing facts that thinking people might want. They are more likely to provide the facts that THEY think people need.
 
Many influential people do not want nobodies (like me) to have guns for self-protection, but many of them have bodyguards, some of whom I assume carry guns.

I especially get a chuckle when I read about the bodyguards that guard the precious bodies of various "woke" singers, whose songs are about how wonderful people are and how those wonderful people they sing about are "victims" of society. Why then do those singers feel they need bodyguards to protect them from those "victims"?
 
TheParser said:
Many influential people do not want nobodies (like me) to have guns for self-protection, but many of them have bodyguards, some of whom I assume carry guns.

I especially get a chuckle when I read about the bodyguards that guard the precious bodies of various "woke" singers, whose songs are about how wonderful people are and how those wonderful people they sing about are "victims" of society. Why then do those singers feel they need bodyguards to protect them from those "victims"?
Click to expand...

If they succeed in disarming the population, the population will be easier to control.
 
Winston said:
precisely because nut jobs who can't get healthcare they need but can get guns they don't need, is why they need an armed detail.
Click to expand...

Is there anyone in the USA who cannot get healthcare?
 
vegas giants said:
Then they can build the death star
Click to expand...

I won’t support tax dollars going to that project until they fix that stupid vulnerability to x wing fighters. How many Death Stars have to be blown up before they figure it out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom