• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Squad Wants More Security

Yes I think the liberal media is full of racist bigots, and no, the President has not said anything racist. Falling for liberal propaganda is the mental deficit the left needs to accept.

Please provide a link that includes the direct quote of Lindsey Graham calling the President a bigot.

On Dec. 8 2015, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham called candidate Donald Trump a "race-baiting, xenophobic bigot" on CNN.

1,318 days since calling Trump a "race-baiting, xenophobic bigot," Lindsey Graham is very angry that Trump is being called a racist | The Battery

I guess CNN is racist media for reporting it?

What is so sad is this information is so easy to find, but the right is so fearful and suspicious of everything outside the Fox News bubble, they dont care venture outside of it. Everything else is evil!
 
Last edited:
You certainly made what you are very clear. But then again, that's well know around here. Everyone noticed.

All hat, no saddle.

Have a good one VG.

I ride bareback. Yeeeeeeeeehah. Lol
 

Ah, I forgot what Graham said 4 years ago.

I guess he's had a change of heart.

I do believe CNN and the rest of the liberal media are race baiting bigots feeding a gullible intellectually vacant audience in a desperate attempt to keep their doors open.

Given their continued slide into ratings obscurity, it would appear I'm not alone in that conclusion.
 
1,318 days since calling Trump a "race-baiting, xenophobic bigot," Lindsey Graham is very angry that Trump is being called a racist | The Battery

I guess CNN is racist media for reporting it?

What is so sad is this information is so easy to find, but the right is so fearful and suspicious of everything outside the Fox News bubble, they dont care venture outside of it. Everything else is evil!

The left controls the media. We used tanks and guns and took over every news station except fox.

They were so stupid we could not be bothered
 
1,318 days since calling Trump a "race-baiting, xenophobic bigot," Lindsey Graham is very angry that Trump is being called a racist | The Battery

I guess CNN is racist media for reporting it?

What is so sad is this information is so easy to find, but the right is so fearful and suspicious of everything outside the Fox News bubble, they dont care venture outside of it. Everything else is evil!

Lindsey Graham. It's time for him to retrieve his brain from John McCain's casket.
 
Ah, I forgot what Graham said 4 years ago.

I guess he's had a change of heart.

I do believe CNN and the rest of the liberal media are race baiting bigots feeding a gullible intellectually vacant audience in a desperate attempt to keep their doors open.

Given their continued slide into ratings obscurity, it would appear I'm not alone in that conclusion.

Yeah, they're all afraid of Trump. Cross him, and he will ruin you. Classic tyrant, but hey, fear the left!
 
I note you refused to address the violence on the left.

That ends any thought of considering your BS further.

I told you before I would refuse to address off topic conversation.

I'll repeat my ask:

I assume then that you will vocally do so, as well as vocally support additional protection for these four women, so long as these threats continue?

Do you also condemn the rhetorical trash Trump is spewing that has inflated the threats against these women?
 
Trump hate almost always accompanies anti gun arguments these days

Off topic. Care to address my post? I'll repeat it for you.

Do you admit Trump's rhetoric encourages violence?

I'm not going to waste my time discussing this with you until, without a "whataboutism" appeal to hypocrisy, you actually answer my post.
 
See technically it isn't hypocrisy. The Congresswomen want less guns to be available to the public in an effort to curb violence. They want law enforcement to keep guns so they have the means to combat those who break the law. Their lives have been made difficult because of the political climate so they have asked for law enforcement to provide additional security.

While I completely disagree with their gun policies, what they have done is not hypocrisy. Nor does it destroy their logic.

Do I get a government paid personal body guard?
 
Off topic. Care to address my post? I'll repeat it for you.

The only thing that is true is that when Trump won, many of his opponents could not accept that and acted violently,
 
Trump's rhetoric encourages bad behavior. The "squad" are under persistent death threats from right wing lunatics encouraged by Trump's dehumanizing rhetoric. Now, of course, you will deny that Trump's "free speech" encourages this behavior.

You're wrong, we all know you're wrong, you'll deny it and claim people can "think for themselves". Clearly some folks cannot and thus the endless barrage of death threats.

You lot need to start disavowing this sort of behavior, en masse, like you INSIST liberals/leftists do with Antifa.

Trump is far more insidious than Antifa could ever be. He is the figurehead of our nation and an avatar of the moral compass of this nation. People will follow what they perceive to be strength. This is well known and documented. Thus, when Trump dehumanizes and reduces people to avatars of ideology, it's easier to disconnect human emotion and view these people as an enemy to be killed/destroyed.

This sort of dehumanizing rhetoric has found a fertile breeding ground among some groups of the far right that have in essence become death squads hell bent on threatening sitting US congresswomen daily.

The president and his entire base are culpable in defending this criminal behavior, and yet, here you guys sit, laughing about "the squad" needing additional protection from the criminal, lunatic, insane fringe of the republican party.

Absolutely ****ing shameful.

Just because you say it doesn't make it true. Prove it.

Make sure it's not the Squad's own rhetoric that is generating the death threats, eh?

Do that. Get numbers. Then we can talk.
 
Thanks for admitting that there are facts that you "might want". In other words, appealing lies. A rare moment of candor from the right-wing.

When I say "facts", that's what I mean. I'm never interested in lies.

btw, what makes you think I speak for the "right-wing"? Do you think I'm that powerful?
 
The only thing that is true is that when Trump won, many of his opponents could not accept that and acted violently,

Address the topic, please.

Spare us the shame of your continued off topic trash replies.
 
Do I get a government paid personal body guard?

That depends, have you personally received a credible death threat? That is usually how that works, take the death threat to the police they determine if it is credible then they provide you with a police escort until the threat is handled.
 
Address the topic, please.

Spare us the shame of your continued off topic trash replies.

That is hilarious given your personal insults directed at me, that had nothing to do with the topic. The fact is, we have left wing loons in office who lie constantly about Trump. My point is it is HYPOCRITICAL for POLITICIANS who want to BAN honest people from owning many types of guns, from wanting to be protected by armed guards bearing the VERY FIREARMS that these politicians want to prevent others from owning.
 
That depends, have you personally received a credible death threat? That is usually how that works, take the death threat to the police they determine if it is credible then they provide you with a police escort until the threat is handled.

that almost never happens. And if the police do nothing and you are killed, your estate has no legal recourse against the police.
 
Just because you say it doesn't make it true. Prove it.

Do that. Get numbers. Then we can talk.

Removed the off topic garbage and will address this.

Does Propaganda Incite Violence? | Institute for Advanced Study

What Is Dehumanization, Anyway? | Psychology Today

So a historical study as well as a psychological PHD review show explicitly how propaganda and rhetoric encourages violence. I am not going to go back and rehash all the times Trump made comments about punching people, shooting them, etc. Firstly you wouldn't admit it and secondly it's all over the web so anyone can find it.

Additionally, I will brook absolutely ZERO claims that this doesn't prove what Trump says causes violence. You're wrong and historical data PROVES beyond a shadow of a doubt that propaganda can incite violence.

Trump, calling people names, removes the human and replaces it with a name. It's fact, that for some people, this is good enough to justify their use of violence. Fact. Irrefutable fact. The only issue here is you or anyone else who supports DJT in accepting facts. This is one of the biggest issues I have with Trump supporters. They outright ignore facts.

Are the people who decide to act on these impulses primarily to blame? Yes, they are. But, DJT is -also- culpable for giving these feelings fertile ground to proliferate; when you claim you'll pay someone's defense bills, for example.
 
that almost never happens. And if the police do nothing and you are killed, your estate has no legal recourse against the police.

It depends on who the threat is from I think, if it is someone they are looking for, or if you are a witness. Then you might. But you are correct it is generally only provided for people who have power. There are exceptions I am sure. But that is what the police are there for.
 
Removed the off topic garbage and will address this.

Does Propaganda Incite Violence? | Institute for Advanced Study

What Is Dehumanization, Anyway? | Psychology Today

So a historical study as well as a psychological PHD review show explicitly how propaganda and rhetoric encourages violence. I am not going to go back and rehash all the times Trump made comments about punching people, shooting them, etc. Firstly you wouldn't admit it and secondly it's all over the web so anyone can find it.

Additionally, I will brook absolutely ZERO claims that this doesn't prove what Trump says causes violence. You're wrong and historical data PROVES beyond a shadow of a doubt that propaganda can incite violence.

Trump, calling people names, removes the human and replaces it with a name. It's fact, that for some people, this is good enough to justify their use of violence. Fact. Irrefutable fact. The only issue here is you or anyone else who supports DJT in accepting facts. This is one of the biggest issues I have with Trump supporters. They outright ignore facts.

Are the people who decide to act on these impulses primarily to blame? Yes, they are. But, DJT is -also- culpable for giving these feelings fertile ground to proliferate; when you claim you'll pay someone's defense bills, for example.

Do those links prove that Trump's rhetoric encourages bad behavior? I don't think so.

That first article was published in the summer of 2015 and a quick skim didn't find any reference to Trump. The second article was an anti-Trump opinion piece that referenced an article published in 1975. Sorry, but that's not proof of anything. And it doesn't matter if you won't brook it. Get over it. Give me proof.

btw, raising the question of whether the Squad's own rhetoric could be generating their death threats might be inconvenient or uncomfortable to you, but it certainly is on-topic. Heck, that bunch is no stranger to the use of calling people names, either.
 
That is hilarious given your personal insults directed at me, that had nothing to do with the topic. The fact is, we have left wing loons in office who lie constantly about Trump. My point is it is HYPOCRITICAL for POLITICIANS who want to BAN honest people from owning many types of guns, from wanting to be protected by armed guards bearing the VERY FIREARMS that these politicians want to prevent others from owning.

And my point is that this wouldn't be an issue IF THE RIGHT WOULD STOP EMBRACING AND BEING APOLOGISTS FOR RACISTS AND LUNATICS THAT MAKE DEATH THREATS.
 
Do those links prove that Trump's rhetoric encourages bad behavior? I don't think so.

Just like I said, you wouldn't recognize it; big surprise there!!!

That first article was published in the summer of 2015 and a quick skim didn't find any reference to Trump. The second article was an anti-Trump opinion piece that referenced an article published in 1975. Sorry, but that's not proof of anything.

Do you think human behavior is taken in a vacuum? I mean seriously. The articles PROVE how demagoguery, like that used by Trump, incites people to do stupid things. Trump is simply an opportunist, another face in a long list of faces that have done the exact same thing.

You're typical, just another -never address the point, deflect, deflect, deflect- guy. At this point, I've had my fill of your non-responses and your muddying the waters.

btw, raising the question of whether the Squad's own rhetoric could be generating their death threats might be inconvenient or uncomfortable to you, but it certainly is on-topic.

Last time I have to read more off topic trash from you.

Off to ignore you go.
 
Just like I said, you wouldn't recognize it; big surprise there!!!



Do you think human behavior is taken in a vacuum? I mean seriously. The articles PROVE how demagoguery, like that used by Trump, incites people to do stupid things. Trump is simply an opportunist, another face in a long list of faces that have done the exact same thing.

You're typical, just another -never address the point, deflect, deflect, deflect- guy. At this point, I've had my fill of your non-responses and your muddying the waters.



Last time I have to read more off topic trash from you.

Off to ignore you go.

LOL!!

Don't worry, it won't break my heart to be ignored by you. But you should read my edit before you go.

Toodles...
 
Back
Top Bottom