- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Never be on the play ground without your gun.
This is merica!!!!
You'd see less bullying, for sure.
Never be on the play ground without your gun.
This is merica!!!!
You'd see less bullying, for sure.
I am so glad you support small children carrying guns.
I will remind you of this often
Bring it.
How does your gun fire by you speaking to a cop? What magical word are you speaking that causes the trigger to press?Not sure how I feel on the issue, while I understand both sides of the argument I am concerned that this could result in more accidental shootings especially when an armed citizen interfaces with law enforcement officers. We shall see how it works
It's important to match the firearm to the shooter's hand. I don't think most 10 y/o could effectively wield a full-size pistol. Best to try sub-compact guns or j-frame revolvers.I am so glad you support small children carrying guns.
I will remind you of this often
How does your gun fire by you speaking to a cop? What magical word are you speaking that causes the trigger to press?
Not sure how I feel on the issue, while I understand both sides of the argument I am concerned that this could result in more accidental shootings especially when an armed citizen interfaces with law enforcement officers. We shall see how it works
Not sure how I feel on the issue, while I understand both sides of the argument I am concerned that this could result in more accidental shootings especially when an armed citizen interfaces with law enforcement officers. We shall see how it works
The new law isn't going to have any effect in either direction as far as idiots who suddenly feel compelled to inject themselves where their input isn't wanted.
They also probably told you to inform them immediately that you are carrying. Not to mention other pertinent laws. Think something like that could be covered in an online course, free, and that would cover most issues.
You've got 6 states that have had Constitutional Carry for more than 5 years. That should be a pretty good test pool, don't you think?
Is there anything that would, other than better ways to deal with those that have serious "issues". even then there would be a limited impact. Problem is, the vast majority of violence involving firearms has no connection to law abiding citizens. Going after firearms is running down the wrong rabbit hole. There are two far more addressing holes called mental illness and gang activities that are far more relivant to the issue at hand.
I can think of one state where it isn't even a requirement to notify a cop that stops you unless he or she specifically ask.
Training in how to deal with an officer while armed.
When I took my CCW class they told me to, "follow the officer's instructions". That's just common sense. I didn't need to go to class for that.
It's very clear how armed citizens are supposed to interact with law enforcement.
You're barking up the wrong tree Casper. I am a gun owner.
A liberal gun owner. (Sssshhhhhh, we're not supposed to exist.)
Well that's stupid in my humble opinion. I give law enforcement the discretion and I don't give discretion to the armed citizen.
They're cops, you're NOT. Cops deserve to be informed as to whether or not the people they interact with are armed, and the law should require citizens to inform them.
I'm a liberal and even I understand this.
With or without a permit, the gun owner/carrier is always responsible for knowing the laws.
It's a valid question. How does speaking to a cop cause your firearm to discharge?Grow up... Junior.
Well that's stupid in my humble opinion. I give law enforcement the discretion and I don't give discretion to the armed citizen.
They're cops, you're NOT. Cops deserve to be informed as to whether or not the people they interact with are armed, and the law should require citizens to inform them.
I'm a liberal and even I understand this.
100% correct. But not a bad idea to let those that carry know those laws, as I said, on line is fine.
The problem with Duty To Inform laws is not the idea behind them, but that they're abused.Well that's stupid in my humble opinion. I give law enforcement the discretion and I don't give discretion to the armed citizen.
They're cops, you're NOT. Cops deserve to be informed as to whether or not the people they interact with are armed, and the law should require citizens to inform them.
I'm a liberal and even I understand this.