• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's still stupid...

apdst said:
Actually, it means he's half black. The other half is white. :lamo
Click to expand...

I've never heard anyone call a half-black person white. Why lie?
 
TurtleDude said:
Tell me truthfully. If another major 2nd Amendment case comes before the supreme court-would you rather have Gorsuch or Merrick Garland being the swing vote? or Kavanaugh versus another woman who is a clone of Kagan?
Click to expand...

You've got a point there, Gorsuch is definitely a better choice than Garland and Kavanaugh is definitely a better choice than a Kagan clone just like Trump is definitely a better choice than Hillary Clinton but even so, you've got to realize that Trump was in favor of the bump stock band, he doesn't like suppressors, and my biggest gripe is that he is in favor of red flag laws which violate due process. So as good as Trump might be, as much of a better alternative he is over Hillary Clinton, I do sometimes get the impression he's an anti gun rights wolf in pro gun rights clothing.
 
calamity said:
I've never heard anyone call a half-black person white. Why lie?
Click to expand...

He's mixed race, not just black, or just white. But, I know your racism won't allow you to understand that. In your world, anyone who isn't white enough, is something else.
 
apdst said:
He's mixed race, not just black, or just white. But, I know your racism won't allow you to understand that. In your world, anyone who isn't white enough, is something else.
Click to expand...

Almost all blacks in the US are mixed. Let's just declare them all white and move on.


Oh, wait. That would not fly in your state.
One-drop rule - Wikipedia

Better yet, then, let's declare all whites black.
 
calamity said:
Almost all blacks in the US are mixed. Let's just declare them all white and move on.


Oh, wait. That would not fly in your state.
One-drop rule - Wikipedia

Better yet, then, let's declare all whites black.
Click to expand...

You just can't wait to prove my point. :lamo

Almost all black people have a white and black parent? Um...:lamo

That's good ****, right there!
 
apdst said:
You just can't wait to prove my point. :lamo

Almost all black people have a white and black parent? Um...:lamo

That's good ****, right there!
Click to expand...

Like I said, your state.

Naomi Ruth née Mason Drake (12 February 1907 – 22 February 1987) was an American who became notable in mid-20th century Louisiana as the Registrar of the Bureau of Vital Statistics for the City of New Orleans (1949–1965), where she imposed strict racial classifications on people under a binary system that recognized only "white" and "black" (or all other.) She unilaterally changed records to classify mixed-race individuals as black if she found they had any black (or African) ancestry, an application of hypodescent rules, and did not notify people of her actions.
Click to expand...

Mid-20th Century....hmmm, not very long ago, now was that? I guess that explains everything.
 
AlbqOwl said:
No, he said because this Judge had ruled unfavorably in other of Trump's business matters and was of Mexican heritage and personally opposed to the wall, he wouldn't be impartial. At the time, President Trump was still being 100% himself and speaking bluntly and what he honestly believed. He wasn't considering what 'politically correct' speech demands. He is slowly learning to be more measured, i.e. politely dishonest, in his speech now like all other politicians.
Click to expand...

So now having faith in the impartiality of our justice system is being "politely dishonest"? Is there nothing you guys won't do to upend the rule of law? Is that because you support a criminal as you leader?
 
calamity said:
Like I said, your state.



Mid-20th Century....hmmm, not very long ago, now was that? I guess that explains everything.
Click to expand...

You're desperately trying to bail yourself out of this one. :lamo
 
apdst said:
You're desperately trying to bail yourself out of this one. :lamo
Click to expand...

Bail? I just proved your argument was a lie...and, not an unintentional one, at that.
 
calamity said:
Bail? I just proved your argument was a lie...and, not an unintentional one, at that.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that Obama's mother wasn't white? :lamo
 
apdst said:
He's mixed race. You don't understand that?
Click to expand...
I understood long before your post. The way you phrased was funny to me. I’m not messing with you, brother, I’m just easily amused. ;)
 
apdst said:
Are you saying that Obama's mother wasn't white? :lamo
Click to expand...

I'm saying your state did not recognize Obama's whiteness until after I was born. And, i doubt you would call him white, ever. So, quit with the bull****.
 
calamity said:
I'm saying your state did not recognize Obama's whiteness until after I was born. And, i doubt you would call him white, ever. So, quit with the bull****.
Click to expand...

My state would have always recognized that Obama had one white parent and one black parent, making him mixed race.

I call him mixed race, when I refer to his race. I can start calling him white, if you want.
 
DebateChallenge said:
You've got a point there, Gorsuch is definitely a better choice than Garland and Kavanaugh is definitely a better choice than a Kagan clone just like Trump is definitely a better choice than Hillary Clinton but even so, you've got to realize that Trump was in favor of the bump stock band, he doesn't like suppressors, and my biggest gripe is that he is in favor of red flag laws which violate due process. So as good as Trump might be, as much of a better alternative he is over Hillary Clinton, I do sometimes get the impression he's an anti gun rights wolf in pro gun rights clothing.
Click to expand...

we have no disagreement
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom