• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Over one million magazines made it into California

BTW:
Had a wonderful morning at the range today with my shooting buds. Looks like the scope is sighted well for 85 feet, next time, it'll be on the outdoor 100 yard range!

What were you shooting? What brand of scope?
 
And this is somehow a good thing ? Whats wrong with you people ? :shock:

It's a great thing to see that there are so many freedom loving citizens of the republic in the SSC.
 
It's a great thing to see that there are so many freedom loving citizens of the republic in the SSC.

The only argument I have is calling them HIGH CAPACITY. Most of them are NORMAL capacity magazines.
 
And this is somehow a good thing ? Whats wrong with you people ? :shock:

Freedom-it is what is for breakfast, lunch and dinner.!!
 
Freedom-it is what is for breakfast, lunch and dinner.!!

No its barbarism as you well know Clint

Freedom has never been defined by the ease with which you can kill one another by legal facility or otherwise :wink:

But you already know this
 
No its barbarism as you well know Clint

Freedom has never been defined by the ease with which you can kill one another by legal facility or otherwise :wink:

But you already know this

You keep defining our freedom in a jaundiced and dishonest vein and your understanding of why people tire of a nanny government telling them what they cannot own, is thin-at best.
 
You keep defining our freedom in a jaundiced and dishonest vein and your understanding of why people tire of a nanny government telling them what they cannot own, is thin-at best.

So to be honest you like having the legal facility to kill as easily as possible irrespective of the fact your murder rate is five times ours as a consequence ... and that this somehow represents freedom right ?
 
So to be honest you like having the legal facility to kill as easily as possible irrespective of the fact your murder rate is five times ours as a consequence ... and that this somehow represents freedom right ?

I like the freedom to own some of what I want for many different legal reasons.
 
Not really. It would have been better if three million would have sold!

Since magazines don't have dates nor serial numbers, how are the gun banners going to tell when someone bought a magazine=especially if they drive to a free state and stock up
 
No its barbarism as you well know Clint

Freedom has never been defined by the ease with which you can kill one another by legal facility or otherwise :wink:

But you already know this

Unless it's self-defense
 
So to be honest you like having the legal facility to kill as easily as possible irrespective of the fact your murder rate is five times ours as a consequence ... and that this somehow represents freedom right ?

A 10 round mag will spit out bullets just as quickly as a 30 round mag. As if that really matters, I make the first round matter, followed by a minimum of one extra, maybe 2, so mag capacity simply does not matter. He problem is not the firearm, it is the operator, there is where your focus should be.
 
A 10 round mag will spit out bullets just as quickly as a 30 round mag. As if that really matters, I make the first round matter, followed by a minimum of one extra, maybe 2, so mag capacity simply does not matter. He problem is not the firearm, it is the operator, there is where your focus should be.

It is funny watching people who claim to be in favor of citizens being able to own guns but they want to ban normal capacity magazines. what they are saying is that at a "certain number of rounds" a legitimate owner becomes untrustworthy.
 
It is funny watching people who claim to be in favor of citizens being able to own guns but they want to ban normal capacity magazines. what they are saying is that at a "certain number of rounds" a legitimate owner becomes untrustworthy.

What it says is that they really do not understand the issue. This comes from ignorance of firearms, human nature, and real world experience. All one can do is attempt to educate them by providing the information they need to come to a more informed POV and focus on the real issues instead of a tool and law-abiding citizens.
 
Back
Top Bottom