• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NRA: ‘shut down forever’

TheParser said:
I join other members (and guests) in wishing good luck to the NRA.

Hopefully, the NRA can become a financially solvent organization.

In some especially dangerous areas of our country, people have no choice but to depend on themselves for protection. (The police seldom/never prevent crime; their job is to come in afterwards to find the bad actors. The police do a good job doing so. We all owe a debt of gratitude to them.)

The rich and the powerful are fully protected. It is we, the little guys, who need the NRA to make sure that Americans (who so wish) can have weapons at home and (in some states) on their persons.
Click to expand...

That's why I am a Life Member.
 
haymarket said:
Bu yet despite challenge after challenge you cannot cite it nor explain what is supposedly wrong with it.
Click to expand...
Well it's not what I said. It's what you lied and said that I said.

You can't cite where I made such a claim. Because I didn't.

It is simply your MO and more personal attacks rather than debate.
Click to expand...
pointing out your fallacy isn't a personal attack. I mock you for your lack of the slightest shred of integrity to admit you are wrong.

But there is never any debate with you. You can't defend your positions without such pathetic dishonesty.

Yet you continue to keep responding doubling down in your dishonesty. I simply respond back because it's mildly amusing, and it further discredits you.

It's funny in a previous post you accused me of being the kind of poster that always wants the last word, yet every argument I've had with you, I simply walk away from it out of boredom.

Why is it you accuse others of your own foibles? Must be something Freudian there...
 
CLAX1911 said:
Well it's not what I said. It's what you lied and said that I said.

You can't cite where I made such a claim. Because I didn't.
Click to expand...

I am talking about post 695 and 696'

here is 695 from me

Quote Originally Posted by CLAX1911 View Post
An example is not a fixation learn to English please.
Click to expand...
With you and the far right it always seems to come up as a straw man in a discussion about the EC.
__________________________________________________ _

and your 696
Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
With you and the far right it always seems to come up as a straw man in a discussion about the EC.
Click to expand...
The electoral college is in the Constitution the Constitution isn't a far-right strawman.

The more shrill you become the less sense you make.

It's like talking to Alex Jones.

________________________________________________

In 695 I stated quite clearly that the subject of larger states always seemed to come up as a straw man in discussion about the Electoral College.

You reproduced that in your 696 and went on to claim that "the Constitution is not a far right strawman". In my post I made no such claim. It is clear I was referring to larger states particularly your obsession with New York that you had cited by name previously as part of the same discussion.

But you blew it then and you continue to do so now. And then you have the utter nerve to accuse me of being shrill and you compare me to right winger Alex Jones.

Totally unacceptable on your part.

Learn to read.
Learn to comprehend what you read.
Learn to write clearly and limit your snide remarks to when you have the upper hand because here you clearly were wrong from the very start of the discussion with your silly Constitution straw man remark.
 
Last edited:
CLAX1911 said:
Well it's not what I said. It's what you lied and said that I said.

You can't cite where I made such a claim. Because I didn't.

pointing out your fallacy isn't a personal attack. I mock you for your lack of the slightest shred of integrity to admit you are wrong.

But there is never any debate with you. You can't defend your positions without such pathetic dishonesty.

Yet you continue to keep responding doubling down in your dishonesty. I simply respond back because it's mildly amusing, and it further discredits you.

It's funny in a previous post you accused me of being the kind of poster that always wants the last word, yet every argument I've had with you, I simply walk away from it out of boredom.

Why is it you accuse others of your own foibles? Must be something Freudian there...
Click to expand...

Yes on the last word thing, he will continue pushing a bad point long after defeated, then keep going for several more posts arguing over your denial that you attacked him. Never willing to move on.
 
haymarket said:
I am talking about post 695 and 696'

here is 695 from me


With you and the far right it always seems to come up as a straw man in a discussion about the EC.
__________________________________________________ _

and your 696

The electoral college is in the Constitution the Constitution isn't a far-right strawman.

The more shrill you become the less sense you make.

It's like talking to Alex Jones.

________________________________________________

In 695 I stated quite clearly that the subject of larger states always seemed to come up as a straw man in discussion about the Electoral College.

You reproduced that in your 696 and went on to claim that "the Constitution is not a far right strawman". In my post I made no such claim. It is clear I was referring to larger states particularly your obsession with New York that you had cited by name previously as part of the same discussion.

But you blew it then and you continue to do so now. And then you have the utter nerve to accuse me of being shrill and you compare me to right winger Alex Jones.

Totally unacceptable on your part.

Learn to read.
Learn to comprehend what you read.
Learn to write clearly and limit your snide remarks to when you have the upper hand because here you clearly were wrong from the very start of the discussion with your silly Constitution straw man remark.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know that was a strawman I did it on purpose and I admitted to it because I'm grown-up enough to do that.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Yes on the last word thing, he will continue pushing a bad point long after defeated, then keep going for several more posts arguing over your denial that you attacked him. Never willing to move on.
Click to expand...

In the past I've just walked away from him out of sheer boredom.
 
haymarket said:
You were simply wrong.
Click to expand...

Yes I was making a straw man. I admitted to it I did it on purpose.

Hoping you weren't so boneheaded you wouldn't learn a lesson, I guess my Hope was in vain.

Enjoy wallowing in your ignorance while pretending that you are some sort of intellectual.


I've had my fun, and so I will permit you to have the last word.

Toodles.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Yes I was making a straw man. I admitted to it I did it on purpose.

Hoping you weren't so boneheaded you wouldn't learn a lesson, I guess my Hope was in vain.

Enjoy wallowing in your ignorance while pretending that you are some sort of intellectual.


I've had my fun, and so I will permit you to have the last word.

Toodles.
Click to expand...

What I learned was that you were wrong and were shown you were wrong.
 
CLAX1911 said:
In the past I've just walked away from him out of sheer boredom.
Click to expand...
I eventually do the same. Otherwise he will continue to push a bad argument indefinately.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
ObamacareFail said:
I eventually do the same. Otherwise he will continue to push a bad argument indefinately.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

there's no point in even talking to him he's not interested in having a discussion or debate he just wants to call people who disagree with him names. So I'm finished.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom