Page 39 of 39 FirstFirst ... 29373839
Results 381 to 386 of 386

Thread: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

  1. #381
    Supreme knower of all
    CLAX1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Houston, in the great state of Texas
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    32,244

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    Okay: here's what you need to do. "Select fire", "full auto", blah blah blah.


    Stop the BS: it's just BS

    The AR15 was designed for the military as a combat weapon - period, full stop.
    No it wasn't. Saying full stop doesn't make you right.

    That's a fact and you know it's a fact and so do your friends.
    No it's false and all my friends know it.

    YOU own one, 'er five, whatever, because it's cooool and you want one: period, full stop.
    Sure, lots of people own things because they think they are cool.

    "Tyranny!" is just more BS; it's a sales tactic.

    "Legal claim", more BS; that "phrase" does not change fact.



    Translation: "Regardless of facts, if I say that enough in every post, people will believe it".

    Won't work.

    So, stop BSing and just be honest about this: you want ARs etc simply because you want them.
    So what? I can have things just because I want them.

    A growing number in society says that people cannot be trusted with them - and the facts bear that out.
    False. Some alarmists are buying into hype. All rifles used in murder combined don't out number knife deaths, let alone one specific model.

    You have no defense - none.
    I want it to pose shirtless in the mirror and look like Rambo is all the defense I need.

    So let the citizens of the US direct our own welfare - it's just a gun dude - nothing more, nothing less.
    Does that also include citizens that don't want moronic laws against scawy scawy bang bangs?

  2. #382
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last Seen
    04-28-19 @ 01:14 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    395

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    Okay: here's what you need to do. "Select fire", "full auto", blah blah blah.


    Stop the BS: it's just BS

    The AR15 was designed for the military as a combat weapon - period, full stop.

    That's a fact and you know it's a fact and so do your friends.

    YOU own one, 'er five, whatever, because it's cooool and you want one: period, full stop.

    "Tyranny!" is just more BS; it's a sales tactic.

    "Legal claim", more BS; that "phrase" does not change fact.



    Translation: "Regardless of facts, if I say that enough in every post, people will believe it".

    Won't work.

    So, stop BSing and just be honest about this: you want ARs etc simply because you want them.

    A growing number in society says that people cannot be trusted with them - and the facts bear that out.

    You have no defense - none.

    So let the citizens of the US direct our own welfare - it's just a gun dude - nothing more, nothing less.
    You've been here before too. You are still looping. You just keep saying the same thing over and over without meaning.

  3. #383
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last Seen
    04-28-19 @ 01:14 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    395

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    So; you see why it's just a waste of time even trying to talk to you? YOU ignore established fact and regurgitate the same old failed BS in order to make you look smart for your gun market: and we know that market - don't we... You're a used car salesman AT BEST dude. You lie through your teeth and attack the facts, because - you have no defense. None.

    I've wasted enough time on your mealy-mouthed BS.

    (chuckle)

    I thought - "maybe - he's got some honest debating skills in 'em"; but - nope; not a chance.


    You have nothing to threaten with. You are already wasting time repeating yourself.

  4. #384
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last Seen
    04-28-19 @ 01:14 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    395

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by marke View Post
    Ameircans have not so much placed judges in positions by which to issue judgments against Ameircan laws and the Constitution as judges have been allowed by ignorant, asleep, or evil Americans to appoint themselves rulers over all to condemn laws and twist the Constitution at will.
    They who would dissolve the constitution in this way are not upholding the constitution. They desire to overthrow the rule of law. They must not be allowed to succeed. I matters not whether they are a judge, a member of the house, a member of the senate, or the president of the United States. To accept what these people want simply because they hold one of these titles is to accept the destruction of all you hold dear.

  5. #385
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    209,081

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by Tans View Post
    You have nothing to threaten with. You are already wasting time repeating yourself.
    Some gun banners live in states where their democrat party masters don't trust them to own common firearms. SO rather than trying to oust those scum bag politicians, they spend their time trying to make sure no one else can own those guns either. I call it the Aesop's fox syndrome of gun control
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    Yeah; a shotgun IS a rifle; it uses a different load.
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    You know that Reagan signed the Brady Bill - right?
    Quote Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
    I'm smart on the gun issue and what we need to do about it.

  6. #386
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last Seen
    04-28-19 @ 01:14 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    395

    Re: Californian Magazine ban struck down by federal district court

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    Some gun banners live in states where their democrat party masters don't trust them to own common firearms. SO rather than trying to oust those scum bag politicians, they spend their time trying to make sure no one else can own those guns either. I call it the Aesop's fox syndrome of gun control
    They are living in a fantasy. In such states, black markets still provide the banned guns and banned magazines.. All banning such equipment does is increase black market activity and fund organized crime. It is just like banning a drug, alcohol, or anything else. It doesn't work. It does not keep said item off the streets.

    Criminals get their guns this way, and former law abiding citizens are now outlaws getting their guns this way. What right does any state have to ignore the agreement that all the states made in the form of the Constitution of the United States? That happens to include the 2nd amendment, which applies to all states and territories.

Page 39 of 39 FirstFirst ... 29373839

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •