• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Real National Emergency

Atheist 2020 said:
During the Middle Ages, Europe had a large amount of kingdoms and to get into the modern age, the Holy Roman Empire that became Germany.
Click to expand...
The Roman empire did not become Germany. It did not bring about the modern age, either. Clocks do that.
Atheist 2020 said:
With the European Union, more of Europe is becoming more as a single country.
Click to expand...
Not really. The UK recently left the EU, France still hates Germany's guts and vice versa, Greece and Italy's economies are still in the toilet and Germany's economy is still going strong. There is very little unity in Europe.
Atheist 2020 said:
With the European Union and NATO countries -- it is moving towards being a single country.
Click to expand...
Argument by repetition fallacy. Already answered previously.
Atheist 2020 said:
Free trade has never been around.
Click to expand...
It is always around. You can't kill it. It's immortal. You can drive it underground, but it's still there. See your local drug dealer for details.
Atheist 2020 said:
You might be thinking more online as the United States. There is no pure free trade.
Click to expand...
Argument by repetition fallacy. True Scotsman fallacy. Already answered.
 
Atheist 2020 said:
We have been moving towards a single world government since the ending of World War II. We are along way from it. I say sometime around 300 to 500 years from now.
Click to expand...

How big is your crystal ball? Trust me, I have one that's bigger, and I don't see **** in it.
 
Rich2018 said:
Well emergency powers might persuade a future president he/she has the power to ban all gun and ammunition sales.
Click to expand...
Here, you are parroting a media talking point. The President has no such power to do so, as it violates the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as well as the inherent and natural right of self defense.

Rich2018 said:
Then perhaps ban only certain types of firearm - like semi/fully automatic long guns....then hand guns....
Click to expand...
Violates the 2nd Amendment...

Rich2018 said:
The right to bear arms would not be infringed of course... just that those wishing to compensate for a small appendage would have to restrict their choice to those firearms approved by the White House.
Click to expand...
Welcome to Paradox City, Home of Irrationality!!

1) The right to bear arms would not be infringed.
2) The right to bear arms would be infringed by the White House.

Which is it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom