• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whys is the Non-partisan PSA: machine guns, full-auto, semi-auto, assault weapons...

Status
Not open for further replies.
If there were links advocating joining the NRA, or Second Amendment, he might have had something to complain about......but there is nothing in the PSA other than descriptions of how the firearms operate; there is no content to be fixed.....nothing in Goshins PSA is incorrect.

He's still pretty upset, though. Shouldn't we act on that?
 
He's still pretty upset, though. Shouldn't we act on that?

Hmmmm....let me think about that.

Nope.

Fact does not end where someone's hurt feelings begin.
 
Damn those right wing extremists. :neutral:

and here, on this very board, I have been told that facts "have a leftwing bias". I guess that wasn't factual!! :mrgreen:
 
and here, on this very board, I have been told that facts "have a leftwing bias". I guess that wasn't factual!! :mrgreen:

I find bias in facts to be a bit of an oxymoron....facts just are.

What people chose to do with them or how they perceive them is where the bias begins.
 
Are there sticky that are left biased? If so, fair. I have never noticed stickies much either way but when I ran across this I was pretty upset.

Why does information upset you so much
 
You guys are playing right into his hands.

These people casually imply something they know you won't like and then slowly draw you into getting more and more negative. They then share this thread as 'proof' of how mean gun owners are to get support for more policy.
 
You guys are playing right into his hands.

These people casually imply something they know you won't like and then slowly draw you into getting more and more negative. They then share this thread as 'proof' of how mean gun owners are to get support for more policy.

Actually, I think he bailed when he couldn't formulate a rational response to the questions, or point out what exactly constituted "bias" in the PSA sticky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom