• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

loving guns more than children

Fetuses aren't children. Right wingers have a hard time with definitions, I see.

Honest gun owners and legal gun uses aren't criminals or illegal gun use either
 
Oooooh! Goes right for the, "baby-killer" label in response to a joke (a masterpiece of a joke, actually).

Listen, friend. I admire your ability to laugh at yourself the same way I admire your sense of propriety - may you not walk into another light post and hurt yourself again today.

Ahh..personal attack. Couldnt get around the baby killer argument. That was your only option according to lefty SOP 4.1.2.
 
Fetuses aren't children. Right wingers have a hard time with definitions, I see.

We know, you kill them before they can be children. Apparently you believe its ok to kill humans except with a gun. Im just waiting for your explanation of your hypocrisy. You support killing unborn humans correct?
 
Says the guy who can't figure out where the European genes in Americans came from. :roll:

knock knock...hello mcfly! You failed to comprehend my comment. Try reading AND comprehension now. Give it another try.
 
Ahh..personal attack. Couldnt get around the baby killer argument. That was your only option according to lefty SOP 4.1.2.

Dude, you're not getting it. I'm not trying to get around any argument, I was making a joke! It was a damn good joke and I'm quite proud of it. In response to your pedantic reply I made a couple more really great jokes that I'm quite proud of as well!

The only person attacking anyone is you.

Happy New Year, my angry friend.
 
Dude, you're not getting it. I'm not trying to get around any argument, I was making a joke! It was a damn good joke and I'm quite proud of it. In response to your pedantic reply I made a couple more really great jokes that I'm quite proud of as well!

The only person attacking anyone is you.

Happy New Year, my angry friend.

jokes are supposed to be funny dude. Its not my fault your "jokes" look like every other leftist dribble post on the forum. Maybe try to be funnier next time.
 
Until an "honest gun owner" like Stephen Paddock decides to kill as many people as he can with his lawfully held guns.

the minute he intended to use the guns illegally, he was no longer a legal gun owner.
 
the minute he intended to use the guns illegally, he was no longer a legal gun owner.




He was a lawful gun owner !!!



He bought the guns LEGALLY


Many mass shootings are done with legally owned guns ...and by people that were (up to that point) law abiding people.


Why do we have the TSA ?
Why can't you take a steel steak knife on to a commercial airplane ?

No law abiding person has EVER done anything illegal on an airplane.


Why are your bags searched before you get on an airplane ?
No law abiding person has every taken anything they shouldn't do on to an airplane.
 
He was a lawful gun owner !!!



He bought the guns LEGALLY


Many mass shootings are done with legally owned guns ...and by people that were (up to that point) law abiding people.


Why do we have the TSA ?
Why can't you take a steel steak knife on to a commercial airplane ?

No law abiding person has EVER done anything illegal on an airplane.


Why are your bags searched before you get on an airplane ?
No law abiding person has every taken anything they shouldn't do on to an airplane.

why do you keep trying to impose your hoplophobic nonsense in a country that you are not even able to vote in, and especially after you admit the constitution prevents your wet dreams from being enacted.

I think we all understand you are terrified that other people can own guns. Deal with it
 
why do you keep trying to impose your hoplophobic nonsense in a country that you are not even able to vote in, and especially after you admit the constitution prevents your wet dreams from being enacted.


So you're openly admitting that every argument you've put up has been defeated and you're now intellectually bankrupt with nothing more to offer by way of coherent argument.

You just have personal attack left.

You vomit out a tirade of hysteria like "hoplophobic nonsense...", "wet dreams.."


No I can't vote in the USA (or anywhere). So I guess my opinion is not as valuable as yours.


I seem to remember a similar mindset in 1776 when most of the population's views were ignored and suffrage refused.
 
So you're openly admitting that every argument you've put up has been defeated and you're now intellectually bankrupt with nothing more to offer by way of coherent argument.

You just have personal attack left.

You vomit out a tirade of hysteria like "hoplophobic nonsense...", "wet dreams.."


No I can't vote in the USA (or anywhere). So I guess my opinion is not as valuable as yours.


I seem to remember a similar mindset in 1776 when most of the population's views were ignored and suffrage refused.

intellectual bankruptcy involves demanding things you know cannot happen. It would be like me constantly saying I want every anti gun liberal to start seeing gun rights the way I do, and that would mean anti gun politicians would be voted out of office entirely

it is unrealistic and won't happen. SO I don't waste my time mentally masturbating over such a thing coming to pass. You constantly howl for gun bans knowing full well that both reality and the constitution prevents that from happening. and your only real argument is that you are afraid of people owning guns and you want to ban them to soothe your irrational fears.
 
intellectual bankruptcy involves demanding things you know cannot happen. It would be like me constantly saying I want every anti gun liberal to start seeing gun rights the way I do, and that would mean anti gun politicians would be voted out of office entirely

it is unrealistic and won't happen. SO I don't waste my time mentally masturbating over such a thing coming to pass. You constantly howl for gun bans knowing full well that both reality and the constitution prevents that from happening. and your only real argument is that you are afraid of people owning guns and you want to ban them to soothe your irrational fears.


Suffice to say, you're bankrupt of arguments...everyone you've to come up with, every objection, every attempt to argue logically against gun control...has been defeated.

You're only left with emotional pleas and insults.
 
Suffice to say, you're bankrupt of arguments...everyone you've to come up with, every objection, every attempt to argue logically against gun control...has been defeated.

You're only left with emotional pleas and insults.

how has your fear of guns defeated my argument

you concede that your desires for gun bans are unable to come about due to the second amendment

plus with 400 million guns and over a million armed government workers, there will always be a supply of firearms

it is your stupid desires that YOU YOURSELF have Said cannot come to fruition.
 
knock knock...hello mcfly! You failed to comprehend my comment. Try reading AND comprehension now. Give it another try.

lol...you're the one who wants to eliminate all the European genes in duh AmeriKa. :roll:
 
We know, you kill them before they can be children. Apparently you believe its ok to kill humans except with a gun. Im just waiting for your explanation of your hypocrisy. You support killing unborn humans correct?

Scrubbing bubbles are a good thing. As are vacuum cleaners. What's your point?
 
Honest gun owners and legal gun uses aren't criminals or illegal gun use either

I'm not opposed to legal honest gun ownership. Trouble only comes in when some one with a gun goes ape **** and begins using it illegally or dishonestly.
 
I’m writing a scene where a jogger blows away the scumbag who tried to rape her. I’m looking at some easily concealed small weapons that carry a lot of punch. The gun has to be lightweight and secure so as not to interfere with a 100 pound woman running. And it needs to be concealable so scumbag couldn’t see it, even at near proximity.

I have another scene where I used the same weapon: a similarly, slight of build female cop working undercover takes out a child serial killer with it, pulling the piece out from under a summer dress. But, in that scene there was less need to overly define the gun. I focused mostly on the action and where she had it hidden.

In my new scene, the jogger learned of said gun from the cop who teaches her how to secure it on her person. So, much more detail is needed. I’m thinking a small holster tucked in the small of her back, at the moment. But I’m not sure.

Any ideas on what weapon fits that bill?

A Ruger LC9.
 
the little Glock 43 or 42 for example

Smith and Wesson Bodyguard in 380 is even smaller.

Thanks. I'll go with the S&W 380. Under 12 oz, roughly 5" total length. It looks perfect.

In the scene that's done I just called the weapon a snubnose. But, I never liked that description. Revolver is just too....I don't know--bland.

I'll update it to write in the semi auto.

...

As the car turned onto the small one-lane track of dirt, several minutes before it came to a stop, Autumn had already pulled her Smith and Wesson Bodyguard 380 out from the holster she had tucked snug on the inside of one thigh beneath the thin little dress. As Charlie’s hands went for her neck, she jammed the little gun under his chin. She immediately began to squeeze the trigger, figuring it would take several shots for the small gun to do the trick.
 
Last edited:
No I can't vote in the USA (or anywhere). So I guess my opinion is not as valuable as yours.

Nope, if you're not an American citizen your opinion doesn't count in this country.
 
Suffice to say, you're bankrupt of arguments...everyone you've to come up with, every objection, every attempt to argue logically against gun control...has been defeated.
There is no logic in gun control.

You're only left with emotional pleas and insults.
That would be the gun control crowd.
 
I'm not opposed to legal honest gun ownership.

But for some strange odd reason you're opposed to pea shooters and pea shooter ownership. Being opposed to a chid's toy is ridiculous.
 
Trouble only comes in when some one with a gun goes ape **** and begins using it illegally or dishonestly.

And trouble is also when some one with a car goes ape**** and begins using the car illegally and dangerously and causes a crash or hits an innocent person.

Aside from that there should be no problem with legal honest ownership and use of cars.
 
Back
Top Bottom