• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:1311]The Second Amendment - A Military Right to Bear Arms

Grand Mal said:
Where I live nearly every house contains at least one liberal and at least one gun. My house contains two of each.
Click to expand...

OH! So liberals are not banneroids?
 
jet57 said:
Of course I brought him to insert a fact of interest to the gun crowds, that their conservative fearless leader was anti second amendment.
Click to expand...

To what point are you making this point? Does it have anything to do with gun control in 12018?
 
RF667799 said:
I know what was in your article. I read it and used it to refute your statement. I can understand you don't like that, but doubling down isn't helping your case.

I didn't say you mentioned anything about confiscation. You know what that fallacy is called, don't you?
Click to expand...

You can't refute that fact that Ronald Reagan was a banneropid. There are plenty of articles that show the gun crowd that Ronnie boy was anti second amendment; by their standards.

YOU inserted confiscation, not me. So your point doesn't hold water.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
At least not all of them are.
Click to expand...

Name the ones that and are not. It's important for some of the far right -wingers here; we wouldn't want them to get it wrong. They should have a list.
 
Rucker61 said:
To what point are you making this point? Does it have anything to do with gun control in 12018?
Click to expand...

it looks like laying the red herring Reagan nonsense is just that-diversion. Reagan is dead. His opinions as a former president with a failing mind mean absolutely zilch today
 
jet57 said:
No, TD's already on the phone to 'em; they're gonna have to think of somethin good before 2020.
Click to expand...

Lets stick to the topic-that the claim that the second amendment only vests for those in the active militia is complete and utter BS.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Which still does not indicate whether you support it, yes or no. Just answer the ****in question.
Click to expand...

Part of his game plan from the start.

If he does not take a stand he never actually has to defend that stand.

That and he likes to ignore dictionary definitions....
 
jet57 said:
GCA; what is that, a new type of fuel injector?
Click to expand...

Gun Control Advocate. It's in common use here. Perhaps you missed it during a long period of enforced absence.
 
jet57 said:
Nope, sorry dude, no straw man there at all: it's an inserted fact in reference to the hated "gun control banneroid liberals.

Nothing you can do about it.
Click to expand...

You are arguing against things I have never supported and never stated, its the ****ing definition of a straw man. If you could quit lying your balls off by asserting I supported or argued something I did not, that would be great.
 
Fledermaus said:
Part of his game plan from the start.

If he does not take a stand he never actually has to defend that stand.

That and he likes to ignore dictionary definitions....
Click to expand...

And legal definitions from SCOTUS decisions.
 
TurtleDude said:
Lets stick to the topic-that the claim that the second amendment only vests for those in the active militia is complete and utter BS.
Click to expand...

So, do you think CLAX1911 knows what he's talking about with respect to firearms?
 
OpportunityCost said:
You are arguing against things I have never supported and never stated, its the ****ing definition of a straw man. If you could quit lying your balls off by asserting I supported or argued something I did not, that would be great.
Click to expand...

Uh nooooo... I made a factual statement and you decided to jump in and try and prove it wrong: you can't.

And look up "strawman".
 
jet57 said:
You can't refute that fact that Ronald Reagan was a banneropid. There are plenty of articles that show the gun crowd that Ronnie boy was anti second amendment; by their standards.

YOU inserted confiscation, not me. So your point doesn't hold water.
Click to expand...

Your source quoted Reagan mentioning confiscation. You understand that? Your source. I didn't try to say anything at all about confiscation.

All I did was use your own source to disprove your notion that, "Reagan never changed his mind..." A notion that was obviously driven by your incomprehension of your own source.

It's a minor point. I'm sure you've failed at larger ones. If you would suck it up instead of making multiple posts as if you have made some grand strategic move you might have more credibility.
 
jet57 said:
So, do you think CLAX1911 knows what he's talking about with respect to firearms?
Click to expand...

There is no doubt in my mind he knows more than you do with respect to firearms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom