Follow up, you asked for this, time to stop lying about what you have posted, voted for, and said:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/gun-control/poll-13071-which-these-gun-measures-do-you-support.html
Voted for all items except excessive taxation, meaning assault ban, registration, special insurance, and micro stamping (so worthless its not admissible in court as evidence)
Never mind that it violates current law. Never mind that we have background checks ALREADY.
Common use has a meaning in Constitutional Dicta, he doesn't need to learn it, YOU DO. It has literally nothing to do with percentages, it has to do with legal, lawful use by US citizens. This is not a moveable meaning, it has a term specifically to legal status of firearms and not whatever argument wanders through your head!
Registrations are a violation of government into the rights of citizens. It presumes guilt and circumvents due process, the government has no right to keep a database of innocent people exercising their rights. Secondly if you establish a limitation on the number of firearms being used, government can logically argue to reduce that number to one, and the same with magazine capacity.
You seek a broad mandate to limit the availability of weapons in the hope to catch a killer when you know it wont do such and will violate the rights of millions of innocent citizens. But...I thought it wasn't about crime?
Oh, look, a blank check on gun control.
Yep, my town was hit by a tornado, and people like you seek to disarm the people wanting to protect their few belongings left to them from looters because emergency services and police are completely overloaded. That makes me incredibly angry. You want a need for firearms; you have it.