• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

3 Mass Shootings in 2 days

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist

Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.


Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.

3 shot at a Wisconsin software company
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...hooter-reported-at-business-in-madison-suburb

...all of it within the past 24 hours.

Is it time for sensible gun control yet?


Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.
 
3 dead in a Maryland distribution center
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/us/maryland-shooting/index.html

4 shot inside of a PA courthouse
https://6abc.com/police-kill-gunman-who-shot-4-in-pennsylvania-court-lobby/4286785/

3 shot at a Wisconsin software company
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...hooter-reported-at-business-in-madison-suburb

...all of it within the past 24 hours.

Is it time for sensible gun control yet?

Lots of laws could have prevented this
 
Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.



Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.




Tell us what law would have stopped this shooting.

Let the bodies hit the floor...
 
Let the bodies hit the floor...

So, you want "common sense gun laws" because of mass shootings but can't actually tell us what would have prevented the shootings you present as a catalyst?

Typical calamity.
 
So, you want "common sense gun laws" because of mass shootings but can't actually tell us what would have prevented the shootings you present as a catalyst?

Typical calamity.

No solutions from you....typical rucker
 
The retards just don't care.

They are frighten little mice who need a gun to make their appendage swell.

No one is gonna take their Viagra away no matter how many are slaughtered.
 
The retards just don't care.

They are frighten little mice who need a gun to make their appendage swell.

No one is gonna take their Viagra away no matter how many are slaughtered.

It really does whittle down to that. Doesn't it? It's why Trump is president; ever-weakening white men losing their identity clutch at straws.
 
So, you want "common sense gun laws" because of mass shootings but can't actually tell us what would have prevented the shootings you present as a catalyst?

Typical calamity.

Decades of relaxed gun laws have enabled tens of millions to buy several hundred million guns. Don't be obtuse.
 
3 dead in a Maryland distribution center
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/us/maryland-shooting/index.html

4 shot inside of a PA courthouse
https://6abc.com/police-kill-gunman-who-shot-4-in-pennsylvania-court-lobby/4286785/

3 shot at a Wisconsin software company
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...hooter-reported-at-business-in-madison-suburb

...all of it within the past 24 hours.

Is it time for sensible gun control yet?


Okay, I'll take the bait.

What exactly is sensible gun control?
 
The retards just don't care.

They are frighten little mice who need a gun to make their appendage swell.

No one is gonna take their Viagra away no matter how many are slaughtered.

Why dont you just try taking our guns tough guy? Surely youre man enough to do so.
 
Okay, I'll take the bait.

What exactly is sensible gun control?

The exact opposite of what we have today and what all the Kavanaugh fluffers want for tomorrow.
 
Why dont you just try taking our guns tough guy? Surely youre man enough to do so.

Clear evidence that we need tighter control on who gets a gun.
 
Decades of relaxed gun laws have enabled tens of millions to buy several hundred million guns. Don't be obtuse.

You will not hear any solutions from pro gunners. They only attack those trying to save lives
 
You will not hear any solutions from pro gunners. They only attack those trying to save lives

Lives are expendable; it's the pea shooters that matter.
 
After thirteen zillion threads on GUN CONTROL, the usual suspects say banning guns is the only solution.

There has always been right and left.
There has always been liberals and conservatives.
There has always been guns.
There has NEVER BEEN mass shootings at this frequency

That being the case, what has changed?

The foundation of our society is what has changed.
it is crumbling underneath our feet.
Resort the sense of right and wrong and it will be fixed.
Restore the sense individual life has value and it will be fixed.
Restore the sense "the world does not revolve around you" and it will be fixed.
Eliminate the sense of instant gratification and it will be fixed.

You want solutions?
I just gave you four.
 
Decades of relaxed gun laws have enabled tens of millions to buy several hundred million guns. Don't be obtuse.

What laws would have prevented law abiding citizens from purchasing guns? Are you looking to make currently eligible buyers ineligible? Are you looking to confiscate guns currently owned by law abiding citizens?

I'm just trying to understand what "common sense" gun laws would reduce the number of eligible buyers and reduce the number of guns to the level to prevent mass shootings.
 
Clear evidence that we need tighter control on who gets a gun.

No its clear evidence that you should just take action. Why dont you? If you want to try and take my freedom, Im just wondering why you havent tried. Is it that you are too weak or too lazy?
 
What laws would have prevented law abiding citizens from purchasing guns? Are you looking to make currently eligible buyers ineligible? Are you looking to confiscate guns currently owned by law abiding citizens?

I'm just trying to understand what "common sense" gun laws would reduce the number of eligible buyers and reduce the number of guns to the level to prevent mass shootings.

My point proven. Only gun control advocates are expected to try to reduce gun deaths
 
No its clear evidence that you should just take action. Why dont you? If you want to try and take my freedom, Im just wondering why you havent tried. Is it that you are to weak or too lazy?

You would put your hands in the air and say yes sir
 
After thirteen zillion threads on GUN CONTROL, the usual suspects say banning guns is the only solution.

There has always been right and left.
There has always been liberals and conservatives.
There has always been guns.
There has NEVER BEEN mass shootings at this frequency

That being the case, what has changed?

The foundation of our society is what has changed.
it is crumbling underneath our feet.
Resort the sense of right and wrong and it will be fixed.
Restore the sense individual life has value and it will be fixed.
Restore the sense "the world does not revolve around you" and it will be fixed.
Eliminate the sense of instant gratification and it will be fixed.

You want solutions?
I just gave you four.

Where is that program working successfully?
 
Back
Top Bottom