• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More Guns = More Gun Deaths

DebateChallenge

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2017
Messages
12,099
Reaction score
3,439
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Its been said time and time again on this forum that more guns means more gun deaths. To some extent that's true and it does make sense. In the same way that if you have more cars you will have more car deaths if you have more guns you will also have more gun deaths. However, more guns does not necessarily mean there will be more deaths period. Simply by having more guns in a society does not mean there will be more deaths from causes other than old age. The one cause of death I would like to see go up is old age. All other causes of death I would like to see go down. Having more guns in a society, while there might be more gun deaths as an unwanted side affect there will be more lives saved because a gun can be used to save a life just as it can be used to take a life and it depends on the user.
 
Its been said time and time again on this forum that more guns means more gun deaths. To some extent that's true and it does make sense. In the same way that if you have more cars you will have more car deaths if you have more guns you will also have more gun deaths. However, more guns does not necessarily mean there will be more deaths period. Simply by having more guns in a society does not mean there will be more deaths from causes other than old age. The one cause of death I would like to see go up is old age. All other causes of death I would like to see go down. Having more guns in a society, while there might be more gun deaths as an unwanted side affect there will be more lives saved because a gun can be used to save a life just as it can be used to take a life and it depends on the user.

Make up your mind.
 
Make up your mind.

My point is, even if more guns does equal more gun deaths that doesn't mean more guns will mean more deaths overall since guns can be used to save lives just as well as they can be used to take lives.
 
Hey......we NEED more gun deaths.

There are still FAR too many thugs running around alive.

More guns in the hands of good people means more dead thugs.

Making America Great Again.

:2usflag:
 
My point is, even if more guns does equal more gun deaths that doesn't mean more guns will mean more deaths

WTF??? :lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo

Take your meds so that you stop debating the voices in your head.
 
My point is, even if more guns does equal more gun deaths that doesn't mean more guns will mean more deaths overall since guns can be used to save lives just as well as they can be used to take lives.

Your main issue is deciding when we get to apply stats and when we do not, in order to split hairs on an over-argued subject.

We do not have enough definitive evidence that more guns will equate to enough new lives saved so that we outweigh the negative that more guns equals more gun deaths. You are assuming constants across the board but with no real stats to back up either condition.

To make this argument valid we need something to illustrate where we are likely to fall if there were more guns (or less guns for that matter.)
 
Hey......we NEED more gun deaths.

There are still FAR too many thugs running around alive.

More guns in the hands of good people means more dead thugs.

Making America Great Again.

:2usflag:
Good point. We just don't want innocent people dying from gun deaths.
 
Hey......we NEED more gun deaths.

There are still FAR too many thugs running around alive.

More guns in the hands of good people means more dead thugs.

Making America Great Again.

:2usflag:
You do know America Great was our WWII Nazi group name?
Maybe you do.
When was America great?, lynching uppity nixxer times?
 
Its been said time and time again on this forum that more guns means more gun deaths. To some extent that's true and it does make sense. In the same way that if you have more cars you will have more car deaths if you have more guns you will also have more gun deaths. However, more guns does not necessarily mean there will be more deaths period. Simply by having more guns in a society does not mean there will be more deaths from causes other than old age. The one cause of death I would like to see go up is old age. All other causes of death I would like to see go down. Having more guns in a society, while there might be more gun deaths as an unwanted side affect there will be more lives saved because a gun can be used to save a life just as it can be used to take a life and it depends on the user.

If more guns make us safer....why aren't we the safest nation on earth?
 
You do know America Great was our WWII Nazi group name?
Maybe you do.
When was America great?, lynching uppity nixxer times?

You sound like a Nazi. Did you know that?
 
If more guns make us safer....why aren't we the safest nation on earth?

For a multitude of reasons. For instance, we use more cars than just about any other nation and so naturally that will result in more deaths due to automobile accidents.
 
For a multitude of reasons. For instance, we use more cars than just about any other nation and so naturally that will result in more deaths due to automobile accidents.

Many countries function quite well and are safer...in fact better than us....without so many guns. I thought guns made us safer?
 
Many countries function quite well and are safer...in fact better than us....without so many guns. I thought guns made us safer?

You can't compare us with different countries, different make up, different history, different culture.
 
Sure you can. Lol

No you can't. Same reason why, at least according to people such as you, you can't compare the USA with Japan with the issue of suicide since its different cultures.
 
No you can't. Same reason why, at least according to people such as you, you can't compare the USA with Japan with the issue of suicide since its different cultures.

Of course you can. You just dont use one country. You use a dozen. It's called accounting for variables
 
Of course you can. You just dont use one country. You use a dozen. It's called accounting for variables

Well in that case I can name well over a dozen countries other than Japan that have higher suicide rates than the USA.
 
My point is, even if more guns does equal more gun deaths that doesn't mean more guns will mean more deaths overall ...

Either more guns equals more gun deaths or it doesn't


In actual fact it does BTW - which is why the USA with more guns than people (only country in the developed world to boast that I think) leads the way with gun deaths.

The UK has strict gun control and so has very low numbers of gun deaths - particularly in mass shootings (one since 1996) despite being just as violent as the USA.

The USA has very lax gun laws and has almost one mass shooting per day.


If you took all (or nearly all) the privately owned guns out of the USA, you would guarantee a dramatic fall in gun deaths and particularly mass shootings.

It really is that simple.
 
If you took all (or nearly all) the privately owned guns out of the USA, you would guarantee a dramatic fall in gun deaths and particularly mass shootings.

It really is that simple.

Since this will never, ever happen in the US, and didn't happen in the UK or Australia, it's a nonsensical proposal. There is no need to even discuss it further.
 
If you took all (or nearly all) the privately owned guns out of the USA, you would guarantee a dramatic fall in gun deaths and particularly mass shootings.
But you would see a rise in other types of death which would outweigh the fall in gun deaths.
 
Back
Top Bottom