Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power'

Gun rights activists in Ohio are suing the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently enacted gun regulations that they regard as an “abuse of power.”
The lawsuits, filed by Ohioans for Concealed Carry and the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, maintains that the gun regulations violate state pre-emption laws, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power' | Fox News

Unfortunately, liberals don't know the meaning of the phrase, "common sense", because they are consistently devoid of any.

tonyanzack said:

Gun rights activists in Ohio are suing the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently enacted gun regulations that they regard as an “abuse of power.”
The lawsuits, filed by Ohioans for Concealed Carry and the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, maintains that the gun regulations violate state pre-emption laws, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power' | Fox News

Unfortunately, liberals don't know the meaning of the phrase, "common sense", because they are consistently devoid of any.

Click to expand...

I wonder what kind of disabilities these fools are talking about? Physical,mental,or just any in general.

tonyanzack said:

Gun rights activists in Ohio are suing the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently enacted gun regulations that they regard as an “abuse of power.”
The lawsuits, filed by Ohioans for Concealed Carry and the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, maintains that the gun regulations violate state pre-emption laws, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power' | Fox News

Unfortunately, liberals don't know the meaning of the phrase, "common sense", because they are consistently devoid of any.

Click to expand...

Fortunately conservative libertarians are easily ignored. They never say much of anything that requires attention be paid to it.

Grand Mal said:

Fortunately conservative libertarians are easily ignored. They never say much of anything that requires attention be paid to it.

Click to expand...

Unless it's the Koch Brothers. :roll:

tonyanzack said:

Gun rights activists in Ohio are suing the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently enacted gun regulations that they regard as an “abuse of power.”
The lawsuits, filed by Ohioans for Concealed Carry and the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, maintains that the gun regulations violate state pre-emption laws, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power' | Fox News

Unfortunately, liberals don't know the meaning of the phrase, "common sense", because they are consistently devoid of any.

Click to expand...

From your article:

That same month, Columbus approved a broad package of regulations to ban bump stocks, make carrying a gun while under disability a misdemeanor, and prohibit brandishing imitation firearms in public, among other items.

Click to expand...

I'm not concerned about the bump stock ban. It's a worthless effort considering what it does can be done exactly the same way with nothing more than the stiffening of a finger and arm. What I'm concerned about here is "under disability" and "brandishing imitation firearms".

I'd need to know exactly what "disabilities" they're referring to. If its any and all then there should be hell to pay. Simply being obese is considered a disability and yet it has no meaningful effect on how that obese person uses a gun.

And "imitation firearms"? Only thing I can think of is toy guns. Seriously?

Kal'Stang said:

From your article:



I'm not concerned about the bump stock ban. It's a worthless effort considering what it does can be done exactly the same way with nothing more than the stiffening of a finger and arm. What I'm concerned about here is "under disability" and "brandishing imitation firearms".

I'd need to know exactly what "disabilities" they're referring to. If its any and all then there should be hell to pay. Simply being obese is considered a disability and yet it has no meaningful effect on how that obese person uses a gun.

And "imitation firearms"? Only thing I can think of is toy guns. Seriously?

Click to expand...

"Brandishing imitation firearms"? I don't know how it is in Ohio but up here if you use an 'imitation firearm' to, say rob a store, it's still armed robbery and if you use it to intimidate someone it's still assault with a weapon, toy or imitation or not.

zsu2357 said:

I wonder what kind of disabilities these fools are talking about? Physical,mental,or just any in general.

Click to expand...

2923.13 Having weapons while under disability.
(A) Unless relieved from disability under operation of law or legal process, no person shall knowingly acquire, have, carry, or use any firearm or dangerous ordnance, if any of the following apply:

(1) The person is a fugitive from justice.

(2) The person is under indictment for or has been convicted of any felony offense of violence or has been adjudicated a delinquent child for the commission of an offense that, if committed by an adult, would have been a felony offense of violence.

(3) The person is under indictment for or has been convicted of any felony offense involving the illegal possession, use, sale, administration, distribution, or trafficking in any drug of abuse or has been adjudicated a delinquent child for the commission of an offense that, if committed by an adult, would have been a felony offense involving the illegal possession, use, sale, administration, distribution, or trafficking in any drug of abuse.

(4) The person is drug dependent, in danger of drug dependence, or a chronic alcoholic.

(5) The person is under adjudication of mental incompetence, has been adjudicated as a mental defective, has been committed to a mental institution, has been found by a court to be a mentally ill person subject to court order, or is an involuntary patient other than one who is a patient only for purposes of observation. As used in this division, "mentally ill person subject to court order" and "patient" have the same meanings as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of having weapons while under disability, a felony of the third degree.


Lawriter - ORC - 2923.13 Having weapons while under disability.

Grand Mal said:

Fortunately conservative libertarians are easily ignored. They never say much of anything that requires attention be paid to it.

Click to expand...

Ha!

Kal'Stang said:

From your article:



I'm not concerned about the bump stock ban. It's a worthless effort considering what it does can be done exactly the same way with nothing more than the stiffening of a finger and arm. What I'm concerned about here is "under disability" and "brandishing imitation firearms".

I'd need to know exactly what "disabilities" they're referring to. If its any and all then there should be hell to pay. Simply being obese is considered a disability and yet it has no meaningful effect on how that obese person uses a gun.

And "imitation firearms"? Only thing I can think of is toy guns. Seriously?

Click to expand...

Pretty much agree.

tonyanzack said:

Gun rights activists in Ohio are suing the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently enacted gun regulations that they regard as an “abuse of power.”
The lawsuits, filed by Ohioans for Concealed Carry and the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, maintains that the gun regulations violate state pre-emption laws, the Columbus Dispatch reported.

Gun rights groups protest Ohio cities' regulations as 'abuse of power' | Fox News

Unfortunately, liberals don't know the meaning of the phrase, "common sense", because they are consistently devoid of any.

Click to expand...

the attention whore who pushed the Cincy bump stock ban claimed that the ohio preemption law doesn't stop this attention whoring since its an accessory not a firearm. He's too dishonest to admit that magazine bans by asshole democrats in democrat run cities were crushed by the same law