- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 12,099
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
If there weren't any bad guys no children would be shot.How else do you think they children are shot ?
If there weren't any bad guys no children would be shot.How else do you think they children are shot ?
We already have. There are over 2000 gun laws on the books.Let's pass lots of them
We already have. There are over 2000 gun laws on the books.
Name a country that has solved this problem without gun control. The answer is obvious
Name a country that has solved this problem without gun control. The answer is obvious
Name a country in your list whose gun control doesn't involve gun bans.
1.So you are saying you want semiautomatic firearms banned and owning single shot firearms turned into a government granted privilege?
2.How many mass shootings a year did each of those countries have prior to passing their draconian gun control laws?
3.From 1885 when the semiautomatic firearm was invented till about Columbine mass shooting happened how many mass shootings a year did we have?
That's stupid. In the 80s AR-15s and the like were perfectly legal, and someone executed could have been executed with any firearm.
Nope. I said gun control.
What kind of gun control do you think those countries enacted? They enacted bans on semiautomatic firearms and made owning a single shot firearm into a state granted privilege. Also it doesn't really prove your point that gun control works when there was very little to no mass shootings to be begin with in those countries that enacted those draconian gun control laws.
You can not name a country on planet earth that has lax gun laws and low gun deaths. Its can't be done
No, people need to GET THE HELL OUT OF MY WAY more.That could be a factor -- people need to respect others more.
(1) or gun bans. Do you or do you not support the gun bans in those countries as part of effective gun control?
(2) It doesn't matter what other countries do. That's not part of Constitutionality, efficacy or enforceability here in the US.
You said this was in the early 80s. I am not aware of any assault style weapons that were banned then. I do know during the Clinton administration there was an assault weapon ban but that was in effect from 1994 to 2004.
Sone states that issue CCWs do require some training but usually its marginal at best.
We already have. There are over 2000 gun laws on the books.
Than let us enforce them. We have to keep better records from both military and law enforcement into one shared data base of every person who has lost their right to own a firearm.
Than let us enforce them. We have to keep better records from both military and law enforcement into one shared data base of every person who has lost their right to own a firearm.
The US has gun bans. And they are constitutional, effective and enforceable.
They aren’t very effective or enforceable in south Chicago. One only has to look at how many bump stocks have been turned in, in States and localities that banned them, to see how well they are enforceable.
Fully auto weapons made after 1986 are effectively banned. How many are used in south Chicago in a crime? Bingo
How many fully automatic firearms were used in south Chicago before the Hughes amendment?
Ever hear of the valentines day massacre? LOL
That was the north side. It was also almost 40 years prior.
I agree. And if we can do a good job at enforcing laws than we wouldn't need 2000+ gun laws.Than let us enforce them. We have to keep better records from both military and law enforcement into one shared data base of every person who has lost their right to own a firearm.
I agree. And if we can do a good job at enforcing laws than we wouldn't need 2000+ gun laws.