• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Being a student is more dangerous than being in the military it seems these days

As good as any you got....but of course none if it is required to pass gun control

Yet you're the one who is insistent about how registration works. Are you admitting that you're for something that has little evidence beyond correlation?
 
Yet you're the one who is insistent about how registration works. Are you admitting that you're for something that has little evidence beyond correlation?

As insistent my plan will work as you are yours will work. Mine just happens to work all over the world.....yours.....not so much
 
Again where is your evidence?

I provided a study by the government measuring the effectiveness of Project Exile that was implemented by a state. I freely admitted that it was narrow in scope, however, from the prospect of the implementation, it appears to reduce homicides by 20%. What is your evidence that registration works?
 
I provided a study by the government measuring the effectiveness of Project Exile that was implemented by a state. I freely admitted that it was narrow in scope, however, from the prospect of the implementation, it appears to reduce homicides by 20%. What is your evidence that registration works?

And you admit that your study does not prove causation.....correct?

Here is a study from John Hopkins

https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2001/gun-laws.html
 
And you admit that your study does not prove causation.....correct?

Maybe not for the nation, and I do admit more research is needed, however here's where I post another study.
This is the same guy that gave evidence that Baltimore's plainclothes unit (getting tough on violent felons) was successful.


Hopkins study finds disbanded Baltimore Police plainclothes unit provided most effective violence strategy, despite problems - Baltimore Sun

Not only that, but the study you linked is flawed.

https://modernrifleman.net/2015/06/...ins-strikes-out-again-with-connecticut-study/
 
Maybe not for the nation, and I do admit more research is needed, however here's where I post another study.

This is the same guy that gave evidence that Baltimore's plainclothes unit (getting tough on violent felons) was successful.


Hopkins study finds disbanded Baltimore Police plainclothes unit provided most effective violence strategy, despite problems - Baltimore Sun

Not only that, but the study you linked is flawed.

https://modernrifleman.net/2015/06/...ins-strikes-out-again-with-connecticut-study/

You still have not proved causation
 
How does that make sense? When did I asked you to prove your claims in the scientific sense. I've ask you to provide evidence for ypur claim.

You constantly say correlation is not causation. Same for your evidence
 
PolitiFact: A comparison of student and soldier fatalities

I just look at the access to guns. It is just too easy to gain access to guns. Too easy.

I am starting to realize, schools are a combat zone. I could never have imagined we would be talking about so many mass shootings. Shooting after shooting, after shooting - Parkland, Las Vegas, Santa Fe.

That is all.

Remember, guns don't kill people.....................


Crooked, greedy, and evil NRA lobbyists do!
 
Remember, guns don't kill people.....................


Crooked, greedy, and evil NRA lobbyists do!

thanks for proving what I have said since I joined DP

most anti gun posters really aren't motivated by their faux claims of wanting more public safety or "saving children" and the other good sounding but irrelevant claims they make. Its all about lefties hating the political power of the NRA and the mainly conservative candidates the NRA supports
 
thanks for proving what I have said since I joined DP

most anti gun posters really aren't motivated by their faux claims of wanting more public safety or "saving children" and the other good sounding but irrelevant claims they make. Its all about lefties hating the political power of the NRA and the mainly conservative candidates the NRA supports

I've said many a time. Most NRA members are reasonable, law abiding people. They are simply being led by evil, crooked people.

Right-wing politicians know that low NRA ratings kill elections. It's a vicious circle, indeed.

Gun-worshipping extremists can't come to terms with these facts. Pity.
 
I've said many a time. Most NRA members are reasonable, law abiding people. They are simply being led by evil, crooked people.

Right-wing politicians know that low NRA ratings kill elections. It's a vicious circle, indeed.

Gun-worshipping extremists can't come to terms with these facts. Pity.

you keep proving my point. that you consider those who support a constitutional right to be evil and crooked is a reflection on your extremism.
 
I've said many a time. Most NRA members are reasonable, law abiding people. They are simply being led by evil, crooked people.

Right-wing politicians know that low NRA ratings kill elections. It's a vicious circle, indeed.

Gun-worshipping extremists can't come to terms with these facts. Pity.

The NRA is all about politics.....not gun rights
 
Back
Top Bottom