• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would You Comply?

Would You Comply?

  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .
Casper said:
Again true, and still not the same as full blown registration, which is highly unlikely to become law or actually enforceable.
Click to expand...

Not unlikely at all
 
Casper said:
True, but that is not the same as Registration, many firearms are bought through private sales so there is no form to be retained. That said, does anyone actually believe all those forms are being retained for 20 years, very doubtful and for many reasons such as going out if business or the FFL dieing, etc.
Click to expand...

if you go out of business I believe you are required to send the forms to the ATF
 
Casper said:
Simple Question:
If the Federal Government made it Law that all Privately owned Firearms must be Registered and you had six months to comply with you comply or not?
Click to expand...

Of course. The question is however, for those who said "no"; what would you do?
 
jet57 said:
Of course. The question is however, for those who said "no"; what would you do?
Click to expand...

worry about jet ratting them out.

have you figured out what a rifle is yet, jet?
 
TurtleDude said:
you mean the business owner? the ATF will come and get the records.
Click to expand...

If they still exist, family and/or friends tend to dump old paperwork, been there, done that, several times. Just curious how does the A T F know someone with a FFL died, by the time SS knows and enters the data months if not years can go by.
 
jet57 said:
Of course. The question is however, for those who said "no"; what would you do?
Click to expand...

Umm, not comply. It is not up to the person to prove that they do or do not own a firearm, that burden falls upon those that claim that they do.
 
I would absolutely not comply.
 
Casper said:
Umm, not comply. It is not up to the person to prove that they do or do not own a firearm, that burden falls upon those that claim that they do.
Click to expand...

that's why gun banners want registration =-to shift the burden on good people
 
TurtleDude said:
that's why gun banners want registration =-to shift the burden on good people
Click to expand...

They would also have make private sales subject to background checks, neither of which is going to happen or are enforceable, they do not grasp the fact that many people are not sheep like they are, it is not within their skill set.
 
Casper said:
They would also have make private sales subject to background checks, neither of which is going to happen or are enforceable, they do not grasp the fact that many people are not sheep like they are, it is not within their skill set.
Click to expand...

those who worship and fluff big brother have a hard time understanding that some of us don't love their beloved master
 
Casper said:
Umm, not comply. It is not up to the person to prove that they do or do not own a firearm, that burden falls upon those that claim that they do.
Click to expand...

Roll the dice.....we will keep the cells warm
 
Casper said:
They would also have make private sales subject to background checks, neither of which is going to happen or are enforceable, they do not grasp the fact that many people are not sheep like they are, it is not within their skill set.
Click to expand...

They are enforced in a dozen different countries
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom