• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The decline of civil discourse from the anti gun movement

more dishonest trolling. why don't you pick a side and stick with it rather than posting whatever you think will stir up the most crap/ We could have a complete thread on gun issues called Bodhi vs Bodhi

Red Herring....
 
I have no idea what you are talking about. There are multiple threads with numerous posts spread over different forums all talking about firearms and control.

Saving lives is about saving lives... that was my point.
 
We are talking about people who support gun ownership and gun irresponsibly.

Your counter argument was women dressing slutty... if you dont see the Straw Man then all I can say is wow.
No, we arent. We are talking about a piece of **** perpetrator who attacked someone for nothing more than their legal stated positions. You defend the attacker just as the rapist. Because the victim should change his position on guns, and the rape victim shouldnt dress so provocatively.

Your position is indefensible...and so you shriek about 'straw men' trying to avoid just how bad you look. It isnt working.
 
No, we arent. We are talking about a piece of **** perpetrator who attacked someone for nothing more than their legal stated positions. You defend the attacker just as the rapist. Because the victim should change his position on guns, and the rape victim shouldnt dress so provocatively.

Your position is indefensible...and so you shriek about 'straw men' trying to avoid just how bad you look. It isnt working.

Red Herring... this does not relate to my argument much at all...
 
The Boston Tea Party was done by vandals too

...but they did not vandalize just ONE PERSON's home, did they?
The Boston tea party also was an act based on an unfair tax. her illegal activities are against one of our RIGHTS. Big difference.
Would you sing the laurels of someone who performed vandalism against free speech?
Would you sing the laurels of someone who performed vandalism against unlawful search and seizure?
Yet you sing the laurels of someone who would completely eliminate another one of those rights on that same list.

What does that make you?

You need to try harder if you are trying to paint her as some martyred patriot.
 
Last edited:
...but they did not vandalize just ONE PERSON's home, did they?
The Boston tea party also was an act based on an unfair tax. her illegal activities are against one of our RIGHTS. Big difference.
Would you sing the laurels of someone who performed vandalism against free speech?
Would you sing the laurels of someone who performed vandalism against unlawful search and seizure?
Yet you sing the laurels of someone who would completely eliminate another one of those rights on that same list.

What does that make you?

You need to try harder if you are trying to paint her as some martyred patriot.

This country was founded by vandals and traitors
 
Back
Top Bottom