• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The decline of civil discourse from the anti gun movement

Mach said:
The absurdity of VanceMack of all people replying in a thread about civil discourse.
Click to expand...

That is kind of funny. The gun rubbers use personal attacks as their main source of argument
 
TurtleDude said:
The article noted the twit plans on appealing her conviction. I wonder what her grounds are-the being a moronic gun hating leftwing asshole means you aren't subject to laws against criminal mischief and vandalism?
Click to expand...

So the cops already did their job then... right?
 
Bodhisattva said:
In order to stop being the victim of anti-gun attacks...
Click to expand...


Blame the victim much?

Another crazy notion would be anti gun rights supporters should not cross the line and engage in illegal activity.
 
Last edited:
Chillfolks said:
Blame the victim much?

Another crazy notion would be anti gun rights supporters should not cross the line and engage in illegal activity.
Click to expand...

That is a good second option...
 
Bodhisattva said:
That is a good second option...
Click to expand...
Ok I have to ask. Do you seriously think asking someone to obey the law should be a second option? If so why is obeying the law not the first option?
 
Bodhisattva said:
So the cops already did their job then... right?
Click to expand...

that she was arrested and convicted suggests so but that doesn't excuse the loony left's rabid hatred of the NRA and their disgusting claims that the NRA is responsible for psycho-killers
 
Chillfolks said:
Ok I have to ask. Do you seriously think asking someone to obey the law should be a second option? If so why is obeying the law not the first option?
Click to expand...

No. Obeying the law should be done in conjunction with it stopping his support of guns.
 
Bodhisattva said:
No. Obeying the law should be done in conjunction with it stopping his support of guns.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to be dense.

One of the two was obeying the law the other wasn't. Your solution is a career change? I could agree if Mr. Cox was complaining about protesters legally following him around and protesting him at his home. However that's not the issue. The issue is a protester vandalizing property.

It's all said and done for now. Justice was served. Crime doesn't pay for the common man
 
roughdraft274 said:
He's not the one that picked the term "civil discourse". Think it through.
Click to expand...

trashing property is a big difference than upsetting some anti gun posters

think that through
 
roughdraft274 said:
Just a tip. Usually when you are trying to make a thread that tries to pretend that the other side is the only one ok with committing crimes and destroying property, it's best not to throw out some kind of preemptive excuse as to why it would be better if your side did it.
Click to expand...

I never suggested the NRA should do that-only that the NRA has a BETTER reason than the twit in question
 
TurtleDude said:
that she was arrested and convicted suggests so but that doesn't excuse the loony left's rabid hatred of the NRA and their disgusting claims that the NRA is responsible for psycho-killers
Click to expand...

Agreed... it is not the NRA's fault... it is the gun owners fault.
 
Bodhisattva said:
Agreed... it is not the NRA's fault... it is the gun owners fault.
Click to expand...

which gun owner? the person who shot the school up-well he didn't own the guns

the father? maybe but is there any reason he knew or should have known his 17 year old son was a clear and present danger?

or gun owners in general?
 
TurtleDude said:
which gun owner? the person who shot the school up-well he didn't own the guns

the father? maybe but is there any reason he knew or should have known his 17 year old son was a clear and present danger?

or gun owners in general?
Click to expand...

The gun owner... his guns were unsecured.
 
Bodhisattva said:
The gun owner... his guns were unsecured.
Click to expand...


In this case are you referring to the TX shooting? I haven't seen any information on how the guns were kept in that home
 
Chillfolks said:
In this case are you referring to the TX shooting? I haven't seen any information on how the guns were kept in that home
Click to expand...

There are so many shootings to choose from....you need a scorecard
 
Chillfolks said:
In this case are you referring to the TX shooting? I haven't seen any information on how the guns were kept in that home
Click to expand...

Which Texas shooting are we talking about?
 
The most recent one with shotgun and revolver
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom