• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

First use of term GUN RIGHTS

vegas giants said:
Yeah it's super easy in this country to get illegal guns
Click to expand...

Exactly. Key word illegal. And that's why we should do a better job enforcing the laws we've already got, instead of making it harder to legally get guns we need to make it harder to illegally get guns.
 
Medusa said:
but enough people are mentally ill and they kill people everyday ,true ?
Click to expand...

And mentally ill people are prohibited from getting guns. So by better enforcing the laws that prevent mentally ill people from getting guns that way we will cut down on the number of murders done by mentally ill people at least where they use guns. As for mentally ill people who use other means to kill, that would require other measures.
 
DebateChallenge said:
Exactly. Key word illegal. And that's why we should do a better job enforcing the laws we've already got, instead of making it harder to legally get guns we need to make it harder to illegally get guns.
Click to expand...

Except that does not work anywhere on the planet....its a great plan except for that. LOL
 
DebateChallenge said:
What's the point of having laws if you're not going to enforce them?
Click to expand...

We CAN'T enforce inadequate laws. We CAN enforce adequate laws. The laws we have suck that is why they never work.
 
vegas giants said:
We CAN'T enforce inadequate laws. We CAN enforce adequate laws. The laws we have suck that is why they never work.
Click to expand...

And what is the difference between an inadequate law and an adequate law? Can you give me examples?
 
DebateChallenge said:
And what is the difference between an inadequate law and an adequate law? Can you give me examples?
Click to expand...

Registration
licensing
waiting periods
mandatory training
universal BC's
 
vegas giants said:
Registration
licensing
waiting periods
mandatory training
universal BC's
Click to expand...


No to registration
No to Licensing
Waiting in exchange for National CC or no
Training only for CC not purchase or open carry
UBC as long as it's free or under 10 to use and open to the public
 
Chillfolks said:
No to registration
No to Licensing
Waiting in exchange for National CC or no
Training only for CC not purchase or open carry
UBC as long as it's free or under 10 to use and open to the public
Click to expand...

How about yes to all
 
Chillfolks said:
No to registration
No to Licensing
Waiting in exchange for National CC or no
Training only for CC not purchase or open carry
UBC as long as it's free or under 10 to use and open to the public
Click to expand...

At the federal level, none is constitutional. training for CC at a state level is not a violation of the constitution. UBC is designed to create a demand for registration. Even the Obama administration admitted UBC are worthless without complete gun registration.
 
Chillfolks said:
No to registration
No to Licensing
Waiting in exchange for National CC or no
Training only for CC not purchase or open carry
UBC as long as it's free or under 10 to use and open to the public
Click to expand...

And all are constitutional
 
Rucker61 said:
And at the same time, look up "property rights". I want to know when folks first started thinking that dirt and rocks had rights.
Click to expand...

Big Lebowski.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom