My evidence is the fact you support those things listed.
No you can't. Thats like saying you support freedom of religion but you think okay to ban some religions or you claim to support free speech but this hate speech should be legal or that you support a woman's right to choose but think elective abortions should be illegal and so on.
So tell me how Ronald Reagan - who supported the same things that I support - was anti-Second Amendment? Tell me how a very long list of Republican office holders who have voted for some of the things on your list were against the Second Amendment.
The reality is that people who employ the tactics you are attempting to employ here are engaging in intellectual dishonesty in a sad attempt to smear their opponents who think differently than they do. It reeks of Joe McCarthy and you should be ashamed of it.
One can support the things on your list and still support the basic right of a citizen to own a firearm. There is no conflict there and only a far right extremist pretends to paint that dishonest and distorted picture as part of their own extremism.
The Second Amendment says that the American people have the right to keep and bear arms. The duly elected representatives of the American people may exercise their Constitutional powers to enact legislation controlling and regulating firearms so long as they do not create an environment where the people cannot exercise their right.
Every single legislator who has voted for any regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single legislative body who has voted to pass a law for the regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single governor who has proposed a law for any regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single governor who has signed into law any regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single president proposed a law for any regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single president who has signed into law any regulation of firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single judge or justice who has upheld the constitutionality of a law regulating firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
Every single Court which has voted to uphold the constitutionality of a law regulating firearms has taken a position which is consistent with this interpretation.
And it is the agreement of all those above with my interpretation which counts in the final analysis.