• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oh Look, Another AR-15 Shooting

Polar Bum said:
And the 86% of all crimes that are committed with pistols??

the OP isn't even a good red herring.
Click to expand...

you mean 86% of crimes involving the illegal use of firearms, involve pistols? I would agree with that
 
TurtleDude said:
you mean 86% of crimes involving the illegal use of firearms, involve pistols? I would agree with that
Click to expand...

Yes...exactly so.

More people are killed by blades than by rifles....nearly 3 times.
 
Polar Bum said:
Yes...exactly so.

More people are killed by blades than by rifles....nearly 3 times.
Click to expand...

The bannerrhoid politicians are trying to bamboozle the public by now using the term "mass shootings" in order to amplify and accentuate their jihad against semi auto rifles. The sheeple are deceived into thinking mass shootings are a major problem and since these bannerrhoid politicians have instructed the nutcases to use AR 15s for these rare massacres, the slow witted often now believe tht AR 15s are a major problem even though it was more than 40 years after it was introduced to the public, than an AR 15 was used in a mass shooting and more are murdered each year with fists than ALL RIFLES combined
 
Fearandloathing said:
citation is definitely needed
Click to expand...

why do anti gun posters demand the same facts be posted over and over. That's nothing more than diversion and its dishonest
 
Common Sense 1 said:
Thanks for posting the information. Now if people will look at this and realize that rifles are used maybe 2 to 3 % of the time in homicides. Banning all rifles* will not solve anything!!

* shotguns, bolt action, semi auto.
Click to expand...

I have no idea what "other guns" means in the table....zip guns and the like possibly?

And, I think I actually understated the difference between knives and rifles...its closer to about 5 times...not 3.

I didn't have a calculator on hand. :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Fearandloathing said:
Notice how a discussion on regulating the more dangerous weapons on the market immediately becomes a "ban" in the minds of the right
Click to expand...

Maybe it's the bills introduced by Democrats in Congress in 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2018 that include the word "ban" in the title.
 
Shotguns are more dangerous than AR-15's, AR-15's are just cooler. This is why most shooters (pathetic beta males) use them, to look badass. The solution is not to ban guns.
 
BobDick said:
Shotguns are more dangerous than AR-15's, AR-15's are just cooler. This is why most shooters (pathetic beta males) use them, to look badass. The solution is not to ban guns.
Click to expand...

In the 54 years that AR-15s have been sold to civilians, they've only been used 15 times in mass shootings. In the majority of those times the number of dead was 6 or less, or the same number of dead in the University of Iowa shooting in 1991 with a .38 revolver. Most mass shooters use handguns.
 
Rucker61 said:
In the 54 years that AR-15s have been sold to civilians, they've only been used 15 times in mass shootings. In the majority of those times the number of dead was 6 or less, or the same number of dead in the University of Iowa shooting in 1991 with a .38 revolver. Most mass shooters use handguns.
Click to expand...

Correction, most 2010's shooters. This however only proves my point more, DON'T BLAME THE GUN.
 
BobDick said:
Lefties like to blame the guns on everything rather than the chemistry in peoples minds.
Click to expand...

We do not puts gun in prison. Even a wacky gun rubber can figure that our
 
If the father gave the kid back his guns I hope he gets charged to the fullest extent possible.

Focus on the people making us less safe not an object.

If the kid stole the guns then how liable should the father be? I would say it depends on how stored
 
TurtleDude said:
another frantic bit of trolling. You didn't even comprehend what he wrote, you just spewed more trollage silliness
Click to expand...

I know what he wrote, which I why I replied as I did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom