• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Shooting Outside my Hotel

The laws are fine. Its the mindless twats that shriek about exercising the laws that are the problem.

There is no place on earth that your plan works
 
It takes a while....but you get there. Good Job!!!
Right. Because pointing out your foolish rhetoric is sooooooooo challenging.

The current laws are fine. Impose mandatory minimums and we are there.
 
Right. Because pointing out your foolish rhetoric is sooooooooo challenging.

The current laws are fine. Impose mandatory minimums and we are there.

There is no where on earth your plan works. LOL
 
Except Japan...which has been proven to you previously.

You must be a gun banner. I oppose that but you have the right to support gun bans if you wish. Hence forth you will be known as a gun banner
 
Now you have it exactly right. I knew you could get there

You are however not there. If the existing laws were enforced, we would be fine. Now you are suggesting that because we are not enforcing exisiting laws, we should add new ones?
 
You are however not there. If the existing laws were enforced, we would be fine. Now you are suggesting that because we are not enforcing exisiting laws, we should add new ones?

Your plan works nowhere on earth. My works in a dozen different places
 
You must be a gun banner. I oppose that but you have the right to support gun bans if you wish. Hence forth you will be known as a gun banner
It wasnt Japans gun bans that got their attention. It was the sentences they imposed. And you know that. Which is why you do your pathetic desperate dance.
 
It wasnt Japans gun bans that got their attention. It was the sentences they imposed. And you know that. Which is why you do your pathetic desperate dance.

Look you have every right to support their gun bans. I do not
 
There is no where on earth your plan works. LOL
Lets see...currently they commit murder, sentenced to 8-10, get out after 3-4 and commit more violent crimes in their communities.

VS

8-10 plus a mandatory minimum of 40 years for use of a firearm in a murder. They serve a MINIMUM of 43 years during which time they commit NO murders or violent crimes in their home communities.

Fact is...you object to the sentences because you know it would fill the prisons with violent criminals. Hell...we'd have to build MORE prisons. And we should...and fill them full with violent offenders. Bury them. Violent crime would drop if for no other reason than the number of violent ****s in prison for 4 decades.
 
Look you have every right to support their gun bans. I do not
You have a right to continue your foolish rhetoric. And you exercise it daily.
 
Lets see...currently they commit murder, sentenced to 8-10, get out after 3-4 and commit more violent crimes in their communities.

VS

8-10 plus a mandatory minimum of 40 years for use of a firearm in a murder. They serve a MINIMUM of 43 years during which time they commit NO murders or violent crimes in their home communities.

Fact is...you object to the sentences because you know it would fill the prisons with violent criminals. Hell...we'd have to build MORE prisons. And we should...and fill them full with violent offenders. Bury them. Violent crime would drop if for no other reason than the number of violent ****s in prison for 4 decades.

I don't object to more sentences. Your conservative republican brothers do. NO ONE likes your plan. LOL
 
I don't object to more sentences. Your conservative republican brothers do. NO ONE likes your plan. LOL
Of course you object to it. The thought of prisons filled with violent felons gives you a sad.
 
I'd have to Uber that. The only reason I do the HI&S bar is because I can just walk up to my room from there. Get drunk, order a burger to go and stumble "home." That's mighty convenient.

Most of the nightlife in that little area is not so good. But you are only 1.5 miles from a great outdoor brewpub, OSHO on 48th and Indian School, and a great little pub JT's across the street, good food at both.
 
Canada, Europe, Australia, japan....etc. LOL Imaginary places!
None of those places have the gang problems the US has. Remove just a few of the inner cities in this country and our figures rival others. Target the gangs and put away violent offenders...problem resolved.
 
None of those places have the gang problems the US has. Remove just a few of the inner cities in this country and our figures rival others. Target the gangs and put away violent offenders...problem resolved.

Yes. Gun control does work very well to reduce all kinds of violence.
 
Yes. Gun control does work very well to reduce all kinds of violence.
Your lack of logic is amazing. Those major cities in the US with the gang problems that account for the majority of gun crimes in this country have stiff gun control laws, while the rest of the country that DOESNT doesnt have the problems. The problem remains...gang violence, not guns.

Your attempts at 'argument' are pathetic and worthless.

FM
 
Your lack of logic is amazing. Those major cities in the US with the gang problems that account for the majority of gun crimes in this country have stiff gun control laws, while the rest of the country that DOESNT doesnt have the problems. The problem remains...gang violence, not guns.

Your attempts at 'argument' are pathetic and worthless.

FM

gun control-the liberal version-only disarms and hassles good people. Those laws are actually designed to do that while creating safer working environments for a favored leftwing constituency-street criminals
 
gun control-the liberal version-only disarms and hassles good people. Those laws are actually designed to do that while creating safer working environments for a favored leftwing constituency-street criminals
Its not surprising that the only thing that leftists can think of is gun bans that target law abiding citizens. The fact has long been known that they literally dont give a **** about the people that are actually dying. All those people represent to them is an opportunity to promote a cause.
 
Your lack of logic is amazing. Those major cities in the US with the gang problems that account for the majority of gun crimes in this country have stiff gun control laws, while the rest of the country that DOESNT doesnt have the problems. The problem remains...gang violence, not guns.

Your attempts at 'argument' are pathetic and worthless.

FM
Awwwwww. Your insults are a concession. Thanks for that.

Gangs exist all over the world. Your plan to deal with them does not work anywhere. Mine has shown to be effective over and over again. Now......insult me again. Lol
 
Awwwwww. Your insults are a concession. Thanks for that.

Gangs exist all over the world. Your plan to deal with them does not work anywhere. Mine has shown to be effective over and over again. Now......insult me again. Lol

Maybe if people that live in those areas would help clean up their neighborhood by working with the police rather than condemn the police every chance they get. Condemning police at every turn is a good way to clean up a city. Just ask Baltimore how that is working for them. It's easier to bitch about **** rather than trying to grow a backbone and put some effort into doing something about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom