- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I know. Thank you.
I love it! Lol
I know. Thank you.
Wait, what?
There's all kinds of gun control that could have prevented the Florida shooting. If it had been enforced. If the people involved hadn't just been going thru the motions and assuming everything would work out fine like the other 23,876 times they had done what they did. Lax enforcement - again - is what gets us into trouble. Glossing over the details is what gets us into trouble.
That gun control doesn't work when it isn't enforced is not proof that gun control doesn't work. It's proof that gun control isn't enforced.
People like to pretend it is rocket science. It isn't.
I've taken more-or-less untrained men and women, spent a day working with them, and at the end of the day they know the Four Rules of Safe Gunhandling, can shoot K-zone hits consistently at common defensive distances, and have learned at least the basic rudiments of legalities and defensive tactics.
At that point they have a significant advantage over the average thug.
I dont see the sense in spending money on things that dont work.
Cops are no guarantee, as has been proven.
As I and others have said, there's no reason a combination of security changes...almost all of which would cost money...are the best way to protect kids in schools.
And I'm sorry you are so lacking in mental development that you are unable to remember that I dont have kids and thus your silly appeal to emotion is useless and an obvious tactic to distract from your overall weak arguments.
agreed
Actually even moreso... give me someone willing, of average intelligence and coordination, who has a modicum of courage and self-discipline and the active-defender mindset, and in thirty minutes (of instruction) I can put a gun in their hand and raise their odds against an armed killer from 2% to 50%.
Hey, there's our term.... Active Defender. To stop an active shooter, you need Active Defenders!
Insult! I win!!!!!! Thanks
Actually even moreso... give me someone willing, of average intelligence and coordination, who has a modicum of courage and self-discipline and the active-defender mindset, and in thirty minutes (of instruction) I can put a gun in their hand and raise their odds against an armed killer from 2% to 50%.
Hey, there's our term.... Active Defender. To stop an active shooter, you need Active Defenders!
So still no more discussion? Just a pathetic claiming you won on the Internet? (when clearly you havent.) I just got tired of reminding you all the time of your failure in using an appeal to emotion to distract from your inability to argue and refute my posts.
Are you able to do so? Please, I'd love to hear why you want to waste $ on a singular security solution for schools.
(Oh look! No appeal to emotion in my post! LOLOLOL)
And I think that many teachers...alive and sacrificed...have proven they are committed to doing so.
You want amateurs. I care about kids
But are not up to the task
Amatuer what?
And no you dont care about kids.
I want professionals. Careful you are crossing the line
Prove it.
it's been explained by more than one poster here...that you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to training and I have clearly pointed out the teachers commitments to their students...with their very lives.
And the cops have proven the opposite.
(Note, I still manage to post without cheap, ineffective appeals to emotion :mrgreen
Professional law enforcementTeachers are paid professionals.
And your limited thinking shows you dont care about kids.
Wrong answer. Prove the lunch lady can’t teach algebra
Professional law enforcement
I want professionals. Careful you are crossing the line
Moderator's Warning: |
Enough with the repetitious one-liners... it is bordering on trolling, repeating the same thing over and over. If you don't have something new to say, or something more substantial than one-line criticisms, I suggest you find another thread in which to post. |
DeleteStill pushing for the guys that stand outside listening to the shots eh?
And the ones that cant be in the classroom when the shooter comes to the door. :doh
Yeah...such limited thinking shows you dont care about those kids you keep using to try and make an emotional appeal.
No doubt those who are just knee-jerk, reflexively anti-gun in all things will automatically hate the idea... but I think anyone genuinely concerned about the safety of students should at least give the idea fair consideration.
I know! If the teachers around his kids are so cra-cra...what's to stop them bringing in guns and shooting them anyway?