• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School Walkouts Across the Land

So? Over 80% of the country wants more gun control.


That is actually an outright bald faced lie.



Actually , 81 percent support requiring buyers of all firearms to be 21 years of age.


From the following article:

Eighty-eight percent support requiring background checks on all gun sales.

Eighty-four percent back preventing sales of firearms to people who have been convicted of violent misdemeanors.

Raising the age limit on gun purchasers is also widely popular. Eighty-two percent think the age limit should be 21 to purchase an assault-style weapon, and 81 percent support requiring purchasers of all firearms to be 21.


More than 3 in 4 voters, 78 percent, want to create a national database with information about each gun sale.
The same percentage support a three-day waiting period for all gun purchases,
and 77 percent support a ban on bump stocks,
which President Donald Trump has called a priority for his administration.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
 
Last edited:
What's the percentage needed for passing laws that aren't Constitutional, effective, enforceable and necessary?

Laws such as requiring waiting until 21 years to buy a gun are enforceable and I predict ( with some insight from cousin who is a retired State Supreme Court Justice ) that law will not be found to be Unconstitutional.
 
Laws such as requiring waiting until 21 years to buy a gun are enforceable and I predict ( with some insight from cousin who is a retired State Supreme Court Justice ) that law will not be found to be Unconstitutional.

Where is the effective and necessary part? My question was inclusive.
 
sorry-its obvious to those who understand guns. You don't even have a consistent position on this issue

I have a very consistent position: gun zealots are nuts, and we need to shove them into the proverbial corner. They are clearly no longer politically credible.
 
I have a very consistent position: gun zealots are nuts, and we need to shove them into the proverbial corner. They are clearly no longer politically credible.

I agree
 
Funny thing that........we have armed security at our sporting events, concerts, courthouses, and any major event or gathering yet we do not want security in our schools, now explain to us again who are the idiots here??????

Armed security is one thing. Arming the musicians, athletes, janitors and anyone else on the staff that strikes your fancy is quite another, but I don't expect you to understand that.
 
Armed security is one thing. Arming the musicians, athletes, janitors and anyone else on the staff that strikes your fancy is quite another, but I don't expect you to understand that.

Then you really do not understand my position in the slightest and probably should not assume that you do or that you can comment on it. Thanks
 
Florida is not the first state that requires a person be 21 years old to buy a long gun.

Both Hawaii and Illinois also require that a person be 21 years of age to buy a long gun or a handgun.
 
Florida is not the first state that requires a person be 21 years old to buy a long gun.

Both Hawaii and Illinois also require that a person be 21 years of age to buy a long gun or a handgun.

those are also two of the worst states when it comes to second amendment rights
 
I have a very consistent position: gun zealots are nuts, and we need to shove them into the proverbial corner. They are clearly no longer politically credible.
So what about car "zealots",stereo and sound "zealots" and on and on. Does each type of "zealot have a certain corner and no longer politically credible? For that matter what kind of "zealot" are you? There must be something.
 
These kids are pawns of the movement. Which I think you meant to say.

You misspelled heroes.

Heroic Pawns? While I support their right to protest. I disagree with their message.

Hero imo is a stretch most had permission to walkout without and consequences. The kids who risk harassment from fellow students or staff for not participating are more heroic than those who participated.
 
Heroic Pawns? While I support their right to protest. I disagree with their message.

Hero imo is a stretch most had permission to walkout without and consequences. The kids who risk harassment from fellow students or staff for not participating are more heroic than those who participated.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion
 
Heroic Pawns? While I support their right to protest. I disagree with their message.

Hero imo is a stretch most had permission to walkout without and consequences. The kids who risk harassment from fellow students or staff for not participating are more heroic than those who participated.
Came across this:eek: Chicago GOP to File Lawsuit Against Chicago Public Schools: Student Walkout ?Political Indoctrination, Pure and Simple?
And this. As far as harassment goes. Ohio student suspended for staying in class during National Walkout Day | Fox News we all have probably seen it.
 
Back
Top Bottom