• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Guns Should Be Confiscated[W:730]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Smack doesn't do anything on its own either. And yet that wrecked your streets too. Difference is, Whitey gets their high on the guns too, so any restriction is out of the question. Even when their children lie bleeding 'cause of their recreational drug.

I have no idea what you are blathering about. I own lots of guns for decades and I am white-I have taught hundreds of people how to shoot and have competed all over the US, England South America, and Canada and I have never heard of anyone getting high off of guns. Your rants make no sense
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

I have no idea what you are blathering about. I own lots of guns for decades and I am white-I have taught hundreds of people how to shoot and have competed all over the US, England, South America, and Canada and I have never heard of anyone getting high off of guns.

Then why have more than one? It's not really just for self defense, is it? They're sexy, aren't they?
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Moderator's Warning:
Knock off the off-topic comments and baiting. Stick to commenting towards the topic in the OP.

Thread bans and/or points are more possible now.
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Moderator's Warning:
Knock off the off-topic comments and baiting. Stick to commenting towards the topic in the OP.

Thread bans and/or points are more possible now.

Ms., I am telling you, all your national problems with firearms are exacerbated by elements of human sexual behavior. This is corroborated by studies from the field of psychology and primatology. That's why the vast majority are incapable of making sensible decisions, you're simply running on the sexual high of the power of firearms, which makes you blind to rational thought. This is not baiting. I am simply relaying what mechanism is at play here. Whether you chose to deny a purely natural scientific approach because you think human beings are somehow magically capable of ignoring its primal urges in these matters (which is quite clearly not the case) is not my problem.
 
Last edited:
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Ms., I am telling you, all your national problems with firearms are exacerbated by elements of human sexual behavior. This is corroborated by studies from the field of psychology and primatology. That's why the vast majority are incapable of making sensible decisions, you're simply running on the sexual high of the power of firearms, which makes you blind to rational thought. This is not baiting. I am simply relaying what mechanism is at play here. Whether you chose to deny a purely natural scientific approach because you think human beings are somehow magically capable of ignoring its primal urges in these matters (which is quite clearly not the case) is not my problem.

Psychology isn't scientific.
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Then why have more than one? It's not really just for self defense, is it? They're sexy, aren't they?

Because a shotgun is really good for clays and pheasants, but suboptimal for elk or concealed carry.

If you think guns are sexy you may have issues that preclude a logical discussion here.
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Psychology isn't scientific.

Sure it is. When psychological experiments clearly show, that ovulating women get much more sexually aroused by imagery showing psychotic mass murderers known from TV specials (Charles Manson, the like) than celebrated Ph.d's and the like, that is unequivocal evidence for the violent nature of human procreation. Which we share with Pan troglodytes, our nearest genetic cousin in the Tree of Life. Those males do exactly the same we do: Explode and butcher the other males and then impregnate the females. No particular difference between US Marines and ISIS in that regard.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/demonicmales.htm

That's why those guns are so sexy, and why the boys refuse to let go of them. 'Cause you need the capacity and willingness to kill the other males, then subconsciously women really want to be impregnated. No matter how ruined it leaves organized society. And furthering your genes to the next generation is the only meaning of life there is, 'cause our reptilian brain knows perfectly well, that there is no life after death.

What they say: "We need sensible gun laws."
What they hear: "I'm taking your *****!"
 
Last edited:
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

If you think guns are sexy you may have issues that preclude a logical discussion here.

I don't dicktate human nature. At the very least, I'm basing it on unequivocal scientific observation. It is almost exclusively boys taking those guns to school, is it not? Is there a single one of them, that were in relationships at the time of their madness? Where do they all come from?
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Then why have more than one? It's not really just for self defense, is it? They're sexy, aren't they?

why do golfers have more than one club?
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Because a shotgun is really good for clays and pheasants, but suboptimal for elk or concealed carry.

If you think guns are sexy you may have issues that preclude a logical discussion here.

Guns aren't sexy. I have never met a gun owner who feels that way and the numbers are well over ten thousand
 
Re: Why Guns Should Be Confiscated

Moderator's Warning:
Thread closed for moderator review.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom