• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

National reciprocity passes house.***[W:286]***

Re: National reciprocity passes house.

sure, just make sure you use the entire quote.

I am running out of room. Your hysterics take up so much space. LOL
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

I am running out of room. Your hysterics take up so much space. LOL

I have yet to see any posters actually respond or back you up on your claims, I have seen people ridicule your claims that the intent of the founders has no relevance to constitutional scholarship or interpretations
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

I have yet to see any posters actually respond or back you up on your claims, I have seen people ridicule your claims that the intent of the founders has no relevance to constitutional scholarship or interpretations

I have seen many people ridicule your claims....even pro gunners. LOL
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

I have seen many people ridicule your claims....even pro gunners. LOL

you're lying yet again. Your arguments in favor of laws designed to harass honest gun owners are routinely panned as laughable baiting silliness. in all the years I have been on this board, I doubt I have seen a lamer set of arguments
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

you're lying yet again. Your arguments in favor of laws designed to harass honest gun owners are routinely panned as laughable baiting silliness. in all the years I have been on this board, I doubt I have seen a lamer set of arguments

Blah blah blah. I think your arguments are stupid too. LOL
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

Blah blah blah. I think your arguments are stupid too. LOL

of course you do but that isn't what matters. People who understand these issues are far more likely to side with my arguments than the stupid stuff like

IT WORKS GREAT

ITS A HUGE SUCCESS

Gun CONTROL SAVES LIVES
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

of course you do but that isn't what matters. People who understand these issues are far more likely to side with my arguments than the stupid stuff like

IT WORKS GREAT

ITS A HUGE SUCCESS

Gun CONTROL SAVES LIVES

I just wanted to say again how proud I am of your courage to talk about being a rape and sodomy survivor. You said gun control is a rape and sodomy of your rights. Its very courageous
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

I just wanted to say again how proud I am of your courage to talk about being a rape and sodomy survivor. You said gun control is a rape and sodomy of your rights. Its very courageous

you're lying again and like most of your posts, you have dishonestly misinterpreted what I have said. gun haters and restrictionists rape the second amendment.
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

you're lying again and like most of your posts, you have dishonestly misinterpreted what I have said. gun haters and restrictionists rape the second amendment.

I hope you have found the rape counseling to be helpful in your recovery
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

Moderator's Warning:
The personal comments and flamebaiting need to stop right now. Anyone talking about a poster and not the topic, will receive points and possible a thread ban.

*Moderation is still possible on posts made before this warning.
 
That's an irrelevant semantic distinction. We've heard for years about how President Obama is violating states rights from right wingers; and now we know it was all grandstanding bull****.

The difference is the 10th amendment only covers things NOT listed in the constitution or bill of rights. The second amendment clearly says "shall not be infringed." By your logic, states have the right to define their own free speech, double jeopardy, and due process of law.
 
So open carry is ok?

Based on what I've read, including some interesting work by Dave Kopel, concealed carry is a privilege and open carry is a right. If states wish to discourage open carry then they need to encourage concealed carry. Discouraging both is as bad as voter suppression.
 
Based on what I've read, including some interesting work by Dave Kopel, concealed carry is a privilege and open carry is a right. If states wish to discourage open carry then they need to encourage concealed carry. Discouraging both is as bad as voter suppression.

I'd agree with Kopel on that position
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

=vegas giants;1067905230]I am still waiting for your plan to reduce gun violence backed by scientific evidence.
Still waiting on YOUR plan. Not the VPC's or the Brady Bunch or MDA's or any other gun ban group. Yeah right "scientific evidence".
This is a gun control forum. We are here to discuss gun control. That I have to remind you of this is just sad.
Yes this is a gun control forum,but you would rather it be your personal gun ban forum. I saw a few pages back where it was mentioned you parrot (not their words mine)the gun ban people.
But why do you YOU CARE SO MUCH about doing away with guns? Not you will answer without some glib "form" answer or something, but what is your stake in it.
And IF you really cared which I doubt you would answer up. I've pretty much read all your responses on each thread and yet have I seen an answer.
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

Still waiting on YOUR plan. Not the VPC's or the Brady Bunch or MDA's or any other gun ban group. Yeah right "scientific evidence".

Yes this is a gun control forum,but you would rather it be your personal gun ban forum. I saw a few pages back where it was mentioned you parrot (not their words mine)the gun ban people.
But why do you YOU CARE SO MUCH about doing away with guns? Not you will answer without some glib "form" answer or something, but what is your stake in it.
And IF you really cared which I doubt you would answer up. I've pretty much read all your responses on each thread and yet have I seen an answer.

I'm against gun bans. Maybe you are for them. Not me
 
The difference is the 10th amendment only covers things NOT listed in the constitution or bill of rights. The second amendment clearly says "shall not be infringed." By your logic, states have the right to define their own free speech, double jeopardy, and due process of law.

So open carry is ok?

You have no right to carry a gun everywhere. For example, you generally may not enter a courtroom with a firearm.
 
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

I'm against gun bans. Maybe you are for them. Not me
Oh I've seen you SAY you aren't a banner or are against bans but do I believe you?No. Now see what you did? You suggested I am for bans even though I know,you know better. Sill waiting.
Originally Posted by zsu2357 View Post
Still waiting on YOUR plan. Not the VPC's or the Brady Bunch or MDA's or any other gun ban group. Yeah right "scientific evidence".

Yes this is a gun control forum,but you would rather it be your personal gun ban forum. I saw a few pages back where it was mentioned you parrot (not their words,mine)the gun ban people.
But why do YOU CARE SO MUCH about doing away with guns? Not you will answer without some glib "form" answer or something, but what is your stake in it.
And IF you really cared which I doubt you would answer up. I've pretty much read all your responses on each thread and yet have I seen an answer.
 
Last edited:
Re: National reciprocity passes house.

Oh I've seen you SAY you aren't a banner or are against bans but do I believe you?No. Now see what you did? You suggested I am for bans even though I know,you know better. Sill waiting.

Keep waiting. LOL
 
You have no right to carry a gun everywhere. For example, you generally may not enter a courtroom with a firearm.

It says "the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep amd BEAR arms SHALL NOT be infringed." so explain to me how I don't have the right to carry anywhere.
 
It says "the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep amd BEAR arms SHALL NOT be infringed." so explain to me how I don't have the right to carry anywhere.

It's because the Founders immediately passed restrictions on where the people could and could not bear their arms. Or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom