• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

how many guns do you think is too many

how many is the limit

  • 1

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 10

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • as many as you want

    Votes: 41 75.9%

  • a full arsenal

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • enough for a zombie apocalypse

    Votes: 5 9.3%

  • enough to arm the chinese military

    Votes: 3 5.6%

  • I hate this poll

    Votes: 4 7.4%
  • Total voters
    54
beerftw

beerftw

proud ammosexual
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Messages
19,711
Reaction score
5,946
Location
kekistan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
A simple question, how many guns do you think a person should own, do you think there should be a limit or no limit? Me personally I barely own any guns as seen in the picture
guns.jpg
that is minus the 1851 colt replica which hides in a box because it was an anniversery edition and too nice to shoot.
 
as many as you have room for in your safes!.
 
beerftw said:
A simple question, how many guns do you think a person should own, do you think there should be a limit or no limit? Me personally I barely own any guns as seen in the picture
View attachment 67225344
that is minus the 1851 colt replica which hides in a box because it was an anniversery edition and too nice to shoot.
Click to expand...

YOU HAVE 8 GUNS!!!! THAT'S TOO MANY!!!! LOOK AT ALL OF THEM ASSAULT WEAPONS!!! YOU'RE A NRA STOOGE AND ALL OF YOUR GUNS SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY!!! (except 1 of your bolt actions so that you're rights aren't violated..but still got to get rid of the straps on em!)

note...that was sarcasm for those that can't tell...
 
Hey, whatever helps you cum harder.
 
Is the lower revolver a Heritage 22? Try CCI "quites" you can shoot in the yard (with an adequate backstop, needless to say) Very quite.
 
Kobie said:
Hey, whatever helps you cum harder.
Click to expand...

beats leaving sarcastic and making unproductive posts on threads without contributing to the actual conversation. Let me think, I remember some gave a name to posters like that...hmmm
 
Last edited:
Slingshot Bob said:
MineView attachment 67225345
Click to expand...

I don't own any, but I sure love the classic look of those black powder guns. All of them. I wanted to get a Dragoon in a box with all of the accessories, but not shoot it. She said why buy it if you aren't going to shoot it? I didn't have a good answer other than the "cool" factor.
 
beerftw said:
A simple question, how many guns do you think a person should own, do you think there should be a limit or no limit? Me personally I barely own any guns as seen in the picture
View attachment 67225344
that is minus the 1851 colt replica which hides in a box because it was an anniversery edition and too nice to shoot.
Click to expand...

One more than you want.
 
Assuming that all law makers understood that the 2nd amendment is a constitutionally protected right that prevent governments ability to put a limit on ownership of firearms. The obvious answer is there is no such thing as to many firearms.

If it was up to liberals, and Vegas Giant we would all be stuck with single shot 22 short rifles, with an ammo allowance of 10 bullet per year. :mrgreen:
 
PleasantValley said:
I don't own any, but I sure love the classic look of those black powder guns. All of them. I wanted to get a Dragoon in a box with all of the accessories, but not shoot it. She said why buy it if you aren't going to shoot it? I didn't have a good answer other than the "cool" factor.
Click to expand...

Lots of fun to shoot, giant cloud of dense, white smoke and ewww that smell! A pain to clean, though. I might fire 30 rounds a year. Some time back, I shot a sow hog from about 80 ft, lead ball went thru both lungs, stopped just under the hide on the far side. It ran 15 ft and dropped, let out 2 death squels and gave up the ghost. Good eating. First big game animal I ever killed. Bout time for another!
 
JLee1977 said:
Assuming that all law makers understood that the 2nd amendment is a constitutionally protected right that prevent governments ability to put a limit on ownership of firearms. The obvious answer is there is no such thing as to many firearms.

If it was up to liberals, and Vegas Giant we would all be stuck with single shot 22 short rifles, with an ammo allowance of 10 bullet per year. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

what the bannerrhoid movement ignores is this

the second amendment is a negative restriction on the government. the government doesn't suddenly get the power to ban YOUR NEXT gun acquisition based on how many times you have bought in the past.
 
JLee1977 said:
Assuming that all law makers understood that the 2nd amendment is a constitutionally protected right that prevent governments ability to put a limit on ownership of firearms. The obvious answer is there is no such thing as to many firearms.

If it was up to liberals, and Vegas Giant we would all be stuck with single shot 22 short rifles, with an ammo allowance of 10 bullet per year. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

TurtleDude said:
what the bannerrhoid movement ignores is this

the second amendment is a negative restriction on the government. the government doesn't suddenly get the power to ban YOUR NEXT gun acquisition based on how many times you have bought in the past.
Click to expand...

Did you guys post in the wrong thread, or did you mean to erect your own strawman to "take down"?

I don't know of any federal gun control proposal that limits the total quantity of firearms you can own. I've literally never heard of one.

But i guess if you want to fantasize about something to whine about, hey, it's a free country.
 
Absentglare said:
Did you guys post in the wrong thread, or did you mean to erect your own strawman to "take down"?

I don't know of any federal gun control proposal that limits the total quantity of firearms you can own. I've literally never heard of one.

But i guess if you want to fantasize about something to whine about, hey, it's a free country.
Click to expand...

one of the proposals Democrats have floated is a limit on how many guns you can buy in a month. It has been proposed in several states and at a federal level
 
TurtleDude said:
one of the proposals Democrats have floated is a limit on how many guns you can buy in a month. It has been proposed in several states and at a federal level
Click to expand...

OH so a limitation on batch sales which fuel the black and gray arms markets.

Surely a law abiding citizen would only be interested in protecting other law abiding citizens RKBA?
 
Absentglare said:
OH so a limitation on batch sales which fuel the black and gray arms markets.

Surely a law abiding citizen would only be interested in protecting other law abiding citizens RKBA?
Click to expand...

this law abiding former DOJ prosecutor opposes stupid laws that are restrictions on what honest people can do
 
Kal'Stang said:
YOU HAVE 8 GUNS!!!! THAT'S TOO MANY!!!! LOOK AT ALL OF THEM ASSAULT WEAPONS!!! YOU'RE A NRA STOOGE AND ALL OF YOUR GUNS SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY!!! (except 1 of your bolt actions so that you're rights aren't violated..but still got to get rid of the straps on em!)

note...that was sarcasm for those that can't tell...
Click to expand...

That lever on the rio grande by rossi or taurus or whatever they call themselves now allows me to take out helicopters and tanks!!!! actually no joking that was an actual rant by ted kennedy when he was alive that we need to ban 30-30 lever actions because they could be used to take out helicopters.
 
beerftw said:
That lever on the rio grande by rossi or taurus or whatever they call themselves now allows me to take out helicopters and tanks!!!! actually no joking that was an actual rant by ted kennedy when he was alive that we need to ban 30-30 lever actions because they could be used to take out helicopters.
Click to expand...

Gun banners hope that appeal to emotion, overrides logic.
 
PleasantValley said:
I don't own any, but I sure love the classic look of those black powder guns. All of them. I wanted to get a Dragoon in a box with all of the accessories, but not shoot it. She said why buy it if you aren't going to shoot it? I didn't have a good answer other than the "cool" factor.
Click to expand...

I don't know about a dragoon model, but a basic confederate model colt can be had for around 150-200 bucks as a nie wall hanger, a union version about 50 bucks more, the only difference being the confederate version was brass framed due to their shortage of steel during the war while the union versions were steel framed with brass trigger guards.

As far as the google search for a colt dragoon 360 bucks for a uberti version, much more if you can find the traditions one made by uberti used with the fancy engraving and bluing.
 
Absentglare said:
Did you guys post in the wrong thread, or did you mean to erect your own strawman to "take down"?

I don't know of any federal gun control proposal that limits the total quantity of firearms you can own. I've literally never heard of one.

But i guess if you want to fantasize about something to whine about, hey, it's a free country.
Click to expand...

This thread is about what you feel the limit of guns owned should be, I started this thread because of an argument with a friend where she argued I had too many guns and tried to argue a limit of one gun per household should be law. This sparked my interest to see if anyone views limits as a good thing and if they do how much, it is more to guage the opinion that a specific gun control topic.

Keep in mind this has been the topic of gun control for decades, just because it has never been a priority push by congress does not mean no one has tried or that no one will try again. So if you will kindly give an answer, debate your answer, or just give it and don't debate, either way this thread has a purpose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom