• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Pro-Gun Law Introduced By Republicans.

apdst said:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Click to expand...

Where have I heard that before? LOL
 
TurtleDude said:
since the federal government (mainly through its courts) has overturned state bans on gay marriage, gay sex, interracial marriage and abortion, it should have the power to overturn state limitations on a real constitutional right
Click to expand...
DOUBLE LIKE!

Havent read the bill yet but I agree with your statement 100% and I have talked about this many times.

Unfortunately what makes those other things easier in reality is the fallout against the individual isnt as bad.
A person can be in a gay marriage and its not a crimes, or if you discriminate against a gay person, the gay person isnt guilty of anything. SO fighting against those things and for equal rights is much easier. I carry my gun where the state says i cant it could be HUGE trouble for me.

Dont get me wrong I am still 100% for fighting against this unconstitutional laws just saying its a different animal and has to be done administratively
 
TurtleDude said:
since the federal government (mainly through its courts) has overturned state bans on gay marriage, gay sex, interracial marriage and abortion, it should have the power to overturn state limitations on a real constitutional right
Click to expand...

Yes, and all of this is absolutely sickening... I mean, where in Article 1 Section 8 is there any enumerated federal government power to legislate on ANY of these issues? ... And when was Article 5 ever invoked to formally amend the Constitution to grant the federal government these powers? I'm waiting Leftists...
 
gfm7175 said:
Yes, and all of this is absolutely sickening... I mean, where in Article 1 Section 8 is there any enumerated federal government power to legislate on ANY of these issues? ... And when was Article 5 ever invoked to formally amend the Constitution to grant the federal government these powers? I'm waiting Leftists...
Click to expand...

Wickard resolved this over 80 years ago
 
vegas giants said:
Wickard resolved this over 80 years ago
Click to expand...

Wickard completely went against the literal text of the Commerce Clause, and is a perfect example of SCOTUS wrongly and unconstitutionally inserting their own opinions into their rulings.
 
gfm7175 said:
Wickard completely went against the literal text of the Commerce Clause, and is a perfect example of SCOTUS wrongly and unconstitutionally inserting their own opinions into their rulings.
Click to expand...

In your opinion which has no legal standing
 
gfm7175 said:
Wickard completely went against the literal text of the Commerce Clause, and is a perfect example of SCOTUS wrongly and unconstitutionally inserting their own opinions into their rulings.
Click to expand...

VG has posted that Wickard gives the federal government the power to restrict you from growing tomatoes in your back yard garden.
 
Rucker61 said:
VG has posted that Wickard gives the federal government the power to restrict you from growing tomatoes in your back yard garden.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY, and that is completely insane on every level... The thought process (and lack of logic) of Leftists completely baffles me
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom