- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
it is in this country.
You are factually incorrect. .....again
it is in this country.
You are factually incorrect. .....again
your opinions don't have much probative value
Such proof is not required
It is when you claim that they work great.
Basic rules of debate, he who makes the claim proves it. If it isnt then I gues you agree with me that there shouldn't be any background checks even though I haven't provided any reason why there shouldn't.No it ain't
Basic rules of debate, he who makes the claim proves it. If it isnt then I gues you agree with me that there shouldn't be any background checks even though I haven't provided any reason why there shouldn't.
What are you talking about? I provide evidence all the time. Please prove that the gun laws in Europe and Canada have a direct cause and effect of their gun deaths and violent crimes.I provide evidence to those who provide it
Washington Post:
As limitation of civil and constitutional rights and violence in the practice of politics becomes more popular with the left, and as we hear calls for socialism and communism coming from young-minds-full-of-mush millenials, it is important to remember that all through the 20th century disarming citizens was a precursor to mass murder of those citizens. Yes, it can happen here, and with every passing day it is easier and easier to see that.
Which group do you trust more? Those who want to disarm you, or those that want you to be able to defend yourself?
It is when you claim that they work great.
your opinions don't have much probative value
Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
What are you talking about? I provide evidence all the time. Please prove that the gun laws in Europe and Canada have a direct cause and effect of their gun deaths and violent crimes.
They have lower gun death rates
They have lower gun death rates
That's not indicative of their laws working. Please provide evidence that their laws have a direct cause and effect.
Sure it is.
No it isn't. If Britain had say 100 car accidents per year while we have like 30,000 per year and Britain decides to make their car laws as stringent as their gun laws with the same perimeters of obtaining and driving a vehicle and they still have 100 car accidents per year that does not prove that Britain's car laws work.
Washington Post:
As limitation of civil and constitutional rights and violence in the practice of politics becomes more popular with the left, and as we hear calls for socialism and communism coming from young-minds-full-of-mush millenials, it is important to remember that all through the 20th century disarming citizens was a precursor to mass murder of those citizens. Yes, it can happen here, and with every passing day it is easier and easier to see that.
Which group do you trust more? Those who want to disarm you, or those that want you to be able to defend yourself?
Then prove your case with detailed evidence
Prove what, specifically?
Your case
My case about what? My analogy or the fact that you can't prove something works merely by looking at how many deaths X country has?
I can't keep holding your hand
It's a simple question. What specifically do you want me to prove? I made two statements that you vaguely asked me to provide evidence.