• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mass Shootings in "Gun Free" Nations

No it ain't
Basic rules of debate, he who makes the claim proves it. If it isnt then I gues you agree with me that there shouldn't be any background checks even though I haven't provided any reason why there shouldn't.
 
Basic rules of debate, he who makes the claim proves it. If it isnt then I gues you agree with me that there shouldn't be any background checks even though I haven't provided any reason why there shouldn't.

I provide evidence to those who provide it
 
I provide evidence to those who provide it
What are you talking about? I provide evidence all the time. Please prove that the gun laws in Europe and Canada have a direct cause and effect of their gun deaths and violent crimes.
 
Washington Post:



As limitation of civil and constitutional rights and violence in the practice of politics becomes more popular with the left, and as we hear calls for socialism and communism coming from young-minds-full-of-mush millenials, it is important to remember that all through the 20th century disarming citizens was a precursor to mass murder of those citizens. Yes, it can happen here, and with every passing day it is easier and easier to see that.

Which group do you trust more? Those who want to disarm you, or those that want you to be able to defend yourself?

Just to let you know, the neerdowells in my generation are of very weak constitution and low information. They are easily dominated by those of us willing to punch back. And since these neerdowells are largely "gender confused" and no they aren't betas they are omegas the strong prevail.

Meaning for all their rioting fit throwing and acting like idiots, they are definitely under control.
 
What are you talking about? I provide evidence all the time. Please prove that the gun laws in Europe and Canada have a direct cause and effect of their gun deaths and violent crimes.

They have lower gun death rates
 
They have lower gun death rates

duh-they did long before they started banning some firearms and limiting the buying or possession of others
 
Sure it is.

No it isn't. If Britain had say 100 car accidents per year while we have like 30,000 per year and Britain decides to make their car laws as stringent as their gun laws with the same perimeters of obtaining and driving a vehicle and they still have 100 car accidents per year that does not prove that Britain's car laws work.
 
No it isn't. If Britain had say 100 car accidents per year while we have like 30,000 per year and Britain decides to make their car laws as stringent as their gun laws with the same perimeters of obtaining and driving a vehicle and they still have 100 car accidents per year that does not prove that Britain's car laws work.

Then prove your case with detailed evidence
 
Washington Post:



As limitation of civil and constitutional rights and violence in the practice of politics becomes more popular with the left, and as we hear calls for socialism and communism coming from young-minds-full-of-mush millenials, it is important to remember that all through the 20th century disarming citizens was a precursor to mass murder of those citizens. Yes, it can happen here, and with every passing day it is easier and easier to see that.

Which group do you trust more? Those who want to disarm you, or those that want you to be able to defend yourself?

Well, a gun advocate would write such a story about mass shootings pre and during WWII. Our concern has been mass shootings in this country.
 
My case about what? My analogy or the fact that you can't prove something works merely by looking at how many deaths X country has?

I can't keep holding your hand
 
It's a simple question. What specifically do you want me to prove? I made two statements that you vaguely asked me to provide evidence.

Too much work
 
Back
Top Bottom