- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
another stupid irrelevant comment.
You got your answer. Canada can enforce a registry and not have mass incarcerations. You lose. Lol
another stupid irrelevant comment.
You got your answer. Canada can enforce a registry and not have mass incarcerations. You lose. Lol
you refuse to say how you would enforce your stupid registry in a country with millions more firearms and firearms owners: and a country where compliance with such laws is less than 25%
I said EXACTLY how I would enforce it. You lose.
what do I lose? go ahead and tell us
This debate. You got CRUSHED!!!! Again!!!!!
declaring yourself a winner when you evade and post stupid one liners is really inane. I get the fact that your goal is not serious debate but to be the court jester around here.
Don't get upset. We don't need a repeat of my signature. Lol
Your inane and juvenile arguments are causing people to laugh, not be upset.
Agreed. Vegas is definitely the laughing stock of these gun control forums...
Awwwwww...you hurt my feelings. LOL
he probably made you feel better. i:mrgreen:
IMO:
Anyone under the age of 21-years old
Anyone that is guilty of a felony.
Anyone that is guilty of a misdemeanor involving assault
Anyone that is not a U.S Citizen
Anyone that has a medical prescription
Anyone that fails a mental health evaluation
Am I missing anything else? If you want a license to drive a car, you need to pass a written test as well as a performance test. If you obtain too many DUIs, do not pay your parking tickets etc.. your license can be suspended. Shouldn't the same standard (to be honest it should be stricter) be applied to owning a firearm?
Just my two cents.
IMO:
Anyone under the age of 21-years old