• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Because Outlaws Don't Obey Laws

This is a truly inane argument.
I am perpetually amazed at its staying power

Pretty sure that no laws reduce instances of crime to zero.
Also pretty sure that laws against crimes exist to reduce the likelihood of someone deciding to engage in criminal activity.


Does anyone actually expect that laws against murder will reduce the murder rate to zero?
Honestly, do you know a single, real, live, adult in charge of their faculties person who believes that laws reduce criminal activity to zero?

Everyone I have ever known expects laws to reduce criminal activity.
I have yet to meet anyone who believes that laws will reduce criminal activity to zero.


That said, a some silly, emotional readers will decide that I am against gun ownership or in favor of gun confiscations or some similar silly ****.
But really all I have said is that the "criminal don't obey laws" argument is monumentally stupid argument.

But, emotionally driven readers should still feel free to jump to and reach untenable, silly conclusions about my stances in re firearms.

have fun



Why laws against murder won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH

Why laws against drugs won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH

Why laws against rape won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH

Why laws against insider trading won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH

gun laws and gun numbers being reduced are unique

that is because the two edged sword guns present.

society isn't any better off if more people do heroin, produce Kiddie porn or engage in other criminal behaviors. but society is better off if more honest people are armed, while more criminals being armed is deleterious for society. Gun laws tend to mostly remove guns from those who do good with them.
 
the real goal of gun banners is getting rid of the NRA and pro gun voters as a formidable voting block
Ya know if for whatever reason the NRA and GOA folded up tommorow it would really,really be interesting to see who the anti' branded the new ultimate baddie.
 
the real goal of gun banners is getting rid of the NRA and pro gun voters as a formidable voting block

If that is your goal I believe you will fail
 
If that is your goal I believe you will fail

you're the gun banner who hates the NRA, not me. have you realized how stupid it is to call me a gun banner and deny you are one?
 
you're the gun banner who hates the NRA, not me. have you realized how stupid it is to call me a gun banner and deny you are one?

Keep telling yourself that. LOL
 
gun laws and gun numbers being reduced are unique

that is because the two edged sword guns present.

society isn't any better off if more people do heroin, produce Kiddie porn or engage in other criminal behaviors. but society is better off if more honest people are armed, while more criminals being armed is deleterious for society. Gun laws tend to mostly remove guns from those who do good with them.

You make it sound almost as if you'd be in favor of laws which reduce the ability of bad guys to get guns.
 
You make it sound almost as if you'd be in favor of laws which reduce the ability of bad guys to get guns.

if there were laws that would do that without interfering with the rights of honest people, I'd have no problems with that. Such laws exist-the ones that hammer criminals for using firearms in crimes and the ones that punish violent felons from being in possession of firearms
 
if there were laws that would do that without interfering with the rights of honest people, I'd have no problems with that. Such laws exist-the ones that hammer criminals for using firearms in crimes and the ones that punish violent felons from being in possession of firearms

If that standard was applied to anything else this country would grind to a halt
 
Almost all traffic laws impact honest safe drivers the most

they restrict how you drive, just like proper gun laws restrict people from discharging weapons in an environment where harm is lucky. but we oppose laws that only restrict the rights of honest people. Bans on types of firearms ONLY impact the lawful owners of guns. Criminals already are banned. Magazine limits and waiting periods or limits on how many guns you can buy or own are only targeting people who can own guns.
 
they restrict how you drive, just like proper gun laws restrict people from discharging weapons in an environment where harm is lucky. but we oppose laws that only restrict the rights of honest people. Bans on types of firearms ONLY impact the lawful owners of guns. Criminals already are banned. Magazine limits and waiting periods or limits on how many guns you can buy or own are only targeting people who can own guns.

They also restrict ownership such as licensing and registration. Car thieves don't register cars....why do I have to?
 
I mention gun confiscation because it's politically impossible to implement. However, anything short of that will have no significant effect on gun crimes.

What a load of crap. Do you think people do crime because they have a gun?

If you want to reduce crime in any meaningful way then reduce the conditionsa that bring it about.

However if your point is to make another really lame attempt at justifying having guns so that you can shoot people without a care then please go ahead with this rather pathetic arguement of yours.
 
Ya know if for whatever reason the NRA and GOA folded up tommorow it would really,really be interesting to see who the anti' branded the new ultimate baddie.

That's easy, it would be the society that still thought it had a right to kill people just because you own a gun to do so with. These gun groups only have power because they have the backing of many people .
 
They also restrict ownership such as licensing and registration. Car thieves don't register cars....why do I have to?

you don't have to register a car if you only use it on private property

no one has seriously tried to ban cars either or suggested confiscating them
 
What a load of crap. Do you think people do crime because they have a gun?

If you want to reduce crime in any meaningful way then reduce the conditionsa that bring it about.

However if your point is to make another really lame attempt at justifying having guns so that you can shoot people without a care then please go ahead with this rather pathetic arguement of yours.

why are some of the most acidic anti gun posts on this board come from people who neither live in this nation nor can vote in our elections?
 
you don't have to register a car if you only use it on private property

no one has seriously tried to ban cars either or suggested confiscating them

Which is a ridiculous argument
 
Almost all traffic laws impact honest safe drivers the most
Almost all laws impacting driving are about driving safely and with the intention of not causing harm to others by acts of stupidity. Big difference between that and creating laws that ban cars.
 
why are some of the most acidic anti gun posts on this board come from people who neither live in this nation nor can vote in our elections?

You will have to explain to me what the magic is that prevents non americans from giving arguements against the stupidity of americans when it comes to guns.
That you fail to counter my arguements and can only pitifully try and counter the arguement maker shows how weak your own views are.

And again, can you point out where my arguement is anti gun. Where as i have no problem pointing out that lacking any intelligent response you will always go to the fall back of whinging that the person you arer arguing with just wants to take your gun away.

You can keep your baby toys for all i care just do not tell me you have a right to be stupid with them.
 
You will have to explain to me what the magic is that prevents non americans from giving arguements against the stupidity of americans when it comes to guns.
That you fail to counter my arguements and can only pitifully try and counter the arguement maker shows how weak your own views are.

And again, can you point out where my arguement is anti gun. Where as i have no problem pointing out that lacking any intelligent response you will always go to the fall back of whinging that the person you arer arguing with just wants to take your gun away.

You can keep your baby toys for all i care just do not tell me you have a right to be stupid with them.

that sort of attitude renders anything you say on firearms worthless. thanks for playing
 
that sort of attitude renders anything you say on firearms worthless. thanks for playing

No, that sort of comment points out the absurdity of people like you always whinging about someone trying to take your toy away.

You could not put up a credible arguement for having a gun if you tried. All you can do is play the game of shout the loudest and the longest and try and drown out any intelligent arguement.

Noted your failurs once again to produce any evidence that i wish to ban guns.
 
Back
Top Bottom