- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
This is a truly inane argument.
I am perpetually amazed at its staying power
Pretty sure that no laws reduce instances of crime to zero.
Also pretty sure that laws against crimes exist to reduce the likelihood of someone deciding to engage in criminal activity.
Does anyone actually expect that laws against murder will reduce the murder rate to zero?
Honestly, do you know a single, real, live, adult in charge of their faculties person who believes that laws reduce criminal activity to zero?
Everyone I have ever known expects laws to reduce criminal activity.
I have yet to meet anyone who believes that laws will reduce criminal activity to zero.
That said, a some silly, emotional readers will decide that I am against gun ownership or in favor of gun confiscations or some similar silly ****.
But really all I have said is that the "criminal don't obey laws" argument is monumentally stupid argument.
But, emotionally driven readers should still feel free to jump to and reach untenable, silly conclusions about my stances in re firearms.
have fun
Why laws against murder won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH
Why laws against drugs won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH
Why laws against rape won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH
Why laws against insider trading won't work
BECAUSE OUTLAWS DON’T OBEY LAWS, DUH
gun laws and gun numbers being reduced are unique
that is because the two edged sword guns present.
society isn't any better off if more people do heroin, produce Kiddie porn or engage in other criminal behaviors. but society is better off if more honest people are armed, while more criminals being armed is deleterious for society. Gun laws tend to mostly remove guns from those who do good with them.