- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Strategic retreat?
who knows, the law is on the side of those who oppose bans
Strategic retreat?
jet just admit you could care less and it's all politics to you. Oh how's that M-1 carbine doing.I hope what it's not supposed to. Oh I hope you weren't keeping it on the down low.Silly denial won't work. Everything that asshole used was made to kill large amounts of people in a very short time.
Your kind of idiotic politics is what has facilitated this BS.
thank you-I have neither. I just want to support the rights of people to own stuff they want and not have dishonest control freaks trying to restrict them for specious reasonsYour dishonesty is only equal to your blood lust.
Could you please point out the denial, thank you.
Good God, how many other rights are you so easily willing to throw away for another's mis-use?
Denial
The guns in Las Vegas weren't "misused," and the shooter was hardly an honest person. People like him are a good reason to re-think the second amendment and it looks like the NRA agrees with me!
Good God, how many other rights are you so easily willing to throw away for another's mis-use?
Post 36He didn't misuse anything, in fact it seems like he thought long and hard about how to use them to kill people.
Appologies, I just saw that I read your post wrong. Somehow I missed the "not" part of weren't
The rifles were used for the purpose they made for. THAT'S the problem.
post 36.
Silly denial won't work. Everything that asshole used was made to kill large amounts of people in a very short time.
Your kind of idiotic politics is what has facilitated this BS.
Now I was fully expecting a dishonest post anyway but hopefull this will help you follow along. However, there is excellent proof on DP that integrity and honesty is light years beyond your posting ability to use those.Could you please point out the denial, thank you.
^^dishonest^^
Post 36
Now I was fully expecting a dishonest post anyway but hopefull this will help you follow along. However, there is excellent proof on DP that integrity and honesty is light years beyond your posting ability to use those.
thank you-I have neither. I just want to support the rights of people to own stuff they want and not have dishonest control freaks trying to restrict them for specious reasons
your hate is pathetic btw
fa·cil·i·tate
fəˈsiləˌtāt/Submit
verb
make (an action or process) easy or easier.
"schools were located on the same campus to facilitate the sharing of resources"
synonyms: make easy/easier, ease, make possible, make smooth/smoother, smooth the way for
If anyone is being dishonest here it's you.
Saying that the Las Vegas massacre was a miss use of firearms is not just a denial of reality, but an out right lie.
Those weapons that that guy used were as all guns are, designed to kill as many people possible, in as short a time as possible.
The bump stock was designef as a range toy. It was not designed to make the gun any deadlier.I think you gun guys are going to have to come to terms with the fact that AR-15s "etc" and 30 round mags and "bump stocks" (who knew), are going to have to go for a while; because saying that this was "not normal" / "missuse" just insults everybody's intelligence and makes the gun crowd look so stupid that they should not be trusted with sharp objects. Ya'gotta anti up now and get into the serious game. The NRA (laughably) has conceded that "bump stocks" need "regulation"... "regulation": "come here little girl, I won't hurt you"....
Yeah, you guys gotta man up; it's comin, and if you don't become a part of the solution, then you will be a part of the problem.
Evidence? Did the patent stated that the main use for the AR was to kill many people? You're using the fallacy of genetics.
Again, evidence?
The bump stock was designef as a range toy. It was not designed to make the gun any deadlier.
Evidence? Did the patent stated that the main use for the AR was to kill many people? You're using the fallacy of genetics.
Again, evidence?
The bump stock was designef as a range toy. It was not designed to make the gun any deadlier.
Evidence? Did the patent stated that the main use for the AR was to kill many people? You're using the fallacy of genetics.
Again, evidence?
The bump stock was designef as a range toy. It was not designed to make the gun any deadlier.
Jesus - you can deny.
https://www.google.com/search?sourc....64.mobile-gws-hp..0.2.1228...0.0.h0MJcOeP2dA
The NRA is open to bump stocks being subject to restrictions.
This goes against the Dem taking points of the NRA against all forms of gun control. Don't let their lies continue.
I'm not. I want stiffer punishments for stolen firearms and weapons charges. But that is enforcement of existing law.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.google.com/search?sourc....64.mobile-gws-hp..0.2.1228...0.0.h0MJcOeP2dA
The NRA is open to bump stocks being subject to restrictions.
This goes against the Dem taking points of the NRA against all forms of gun control. Don't let their lies continue.
.....On the topic of the OP. I dont care. IMO, if this would successfully act as an appeasement...have at it.
Not sure it will tho, but worth seeing it play out for an example.