• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

All we want are background checks!!

What more beyond Background checks

  • I only want background checks on all sales

    Votes: 14 38.9%

  • I want to ban those who pass checks from being able to own some guns

    Votes: 4 11.1%

  • a ban on all firearms for private citizens

    Votes: 2 5.6%

  • Other including I don't support background checks

    Votes: 16 44.4%
  • Total voters
    36
vegas giants said:
Many others have called you out on your lies and your gun banning views are crystal clear
Click to expand...

only you vegas but I note you haven't voted in this poll. you're the only poster who claims I am a gun banner. At least a dozen note you are.
 
TurtleDude said:
only you vegas but I note you haven't voted in this poll. you're the only poster who claims I am a gun banner. At least a dozen note you are.
Click to expand...

That is just an outright lie. It is ridiculously laughable. I be;ieve you tried to make a poll about it....show me the results. LOL
 
vegas giants said:
That is just an outright lie. It is ridiculously laughable. I be;ieve you tried to make a poll about it....show me the results. LOL
Click to expand...

What poll? and yes you started calling pro gun posters "gun banners" when you were upset that your lies about not being a gun banner were rejected
 
TurtleDude said:
What poll? and yes you started calling pro gun posters "gun banners" when you were upset that your lies about not being a gun banner were rejected
Click to expand...

Just don't get upset again and have another emotional outburst because you have been challenged over your gun banning views
 
vegas giants said:
Just don't get upset again and have another emotional outburst because you have been challenged over your gun banning views
Click to expand...

more stupid lies. you get owned and you start lying claiming I have gun banner views is terminal stupidity
 
TurtleDude said:
more stupid lies. you get owned and you start lying claiming I have gun banner views is terminal stupidity
Click to expand...

Remember the OP? Background checks? Try to calm down and stay on track
 
vegas giants said:
Remember the OP? Background checks? Try to calm down and stay on track
Click to expand...

you have failed to vote. since you haven't, you are disrupting the thread.
 
But Mr. Bloomberg is pushing for something very different. His Initiative 594, on the November ballot in Washington State, purports to be merely “universal background checks,” but it would criminalize many of the ordinary activities of gun ownership. It isn’t just about private sales. It is about private loans, even those that last just a few minutes. The bill makes it illegal to allow a visiting friend to hold and examine your new gun, while at your house and in your continuous presence. More precisely, the bill requires that you and your friend first take the gun to a gun store. The dealer will take the gun into his custody and fill out all the same paperwork he would if he were selling you a gun out of his own inventory. You will pay whatever fee the dealer charges.

Then your friend can receive the gun from the dealer. You can drive home, and your friend can look at the gun for a while, or even shoot it at some cans on your property. After he’s done, and ready to hand the gun back to you, the two of you must return to the gun store. The store will process the return of your gun exactly the same way as it did the original “transfer.” All the same paperwork again, and another fee.

Read more at: | National Review
 
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20171019/bad-news-for-universal-background-check-supporters

How well does that work to make us safer? Well, take one more look at that study on background check laws. Supposedly, Delaware saw a significant increase in background checks. Unfortunately, Delaware also saw its homicide rate significantly increase as well; from 4.4 in 2013 to a 30-year high of 6.6 in 2015, before dropping slightly to 5.9 in 2016. Washington and Colorado also had a slight increase in homicide rates (from 2.4 to 2.7 in the case of Washington and 3.3 to 3.7 for Colorado), but nothing like the spike seen in Delaware. Yes, the state most compliant with its “universal” background check law also had the highest homicide rate and the biggest increase in its homicide rate of the states studied.

its akin to the Brady fans who claimed the value was denying thugs legal gun purchases even if crime was not decreased at all
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom