• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I just want to save lives

TD needs to stop. I will never stop correcting the record. Police your own team

Pointing out FBI data is not claiming that all crime comes from Blacks, especially given the data. Stop the lying.
 
Pointing out FBI data is not claiming that all crime comes from Blacks, especially given the data. Stop the lying.

I have never supported a gun ban. He is flat out lying and so are you
 
I have never supported a gun ban. He is flat out lying and so are you

I've not called you a gun banner - I've just been trying to figure out your high level of cognitive dissonance with regards to "I'm not a gun banner" and "gun control works in Japan", where they've had a gun ban for over 400 years.

You, however, have taken statements, entirely true statements based on FBI data about the percentage of crimes attributed to Blacks and extrapolated that into a claim that the poster of such FBI data wants to ban guns from all Blacks. That simply is not true.
 
I've not called you a gun banner - I've just been trying to figure out your high level of cognitive dissonance with regards to "I'm not a gun banner" and "gun control works in Japan", where they've had a gun ban for over 400 years.

You, however, have taken statements, entirely true statements based on FBI data about the percentage of crimes attributed to Blacks and extrapolated that into a claim that the poster of such FBI data wants to ban guns from all Blacks. That simply is not true.

Then be a man and go on record. Is TD lying about me? Don't weasel out now
 
Then be a man and go on record. Is TD lying about me? Don't weasel out now

Can't say for sure - he's taken the same data I have and made that decision.

If "gun control works" for Japan, and all they did was ban all guns, how can you support Japanese gun control without support gun bans? Can you answer that?
 
Can't say for sure - he's taken the same data I have and made that decision.

If "gun control works" for Japan, and all they did was ban all guns, how can you support Japanese gun control without support gun bans? Can you answer that?

You weasled out. You are lying
 
You weasled out. You are lying

I have given you enough chances to defend yourself, but you are unable to do so. You support gun bans in that you praise the gun control efforts in both England and Japan, both of which depend heavily on gun bans to maintain their homicide rates. Date clearly shows that mere control gun laws were not working to control the homicide rate in England through the second half of the 20th century and it wasn't until teh gun ban passed in 1996 that any downward trend was evident.

Japan depends almost entirely upon gun bans for their gun control efforts.

If you claim that you don't support gun bans, but still maintain that gun control works in England and Japan you are either lying or are unable cogitate sufficiently well to see the dependencies that are quite evident.

TD is spot on with his claim of you lying and he not wanting to ban guns from Blacks.

Good enough, homeslice?
 
I have given you enough chances to defend yourself, but you are unable to do so. You support gun bans in that you praise the gun control efforts in both England and Japan, both of which depend heavily on gun bans to maintain their homicide rates. Date clearly shows that mere control gun laws were not working to control the homicide rate in England through the second half of the 20th century and it wasn't until teh gun ban passed in 1996 that any downward trend was evident.

Japan depends almost entirely upon gun bans for their gun control efforts.

If you claim that you don't support gun bans, but still maintain that gun control works in England and Japan you are either lying or are unable cogitate sufficiently well to see the dependencies that are quite evident.

TD is spot on with his claim of you lying and he not wanting to ban guns from Blacks.

Good enough, homeslice?

I am not on trial. You are also a racist gun banner. You want to ban blacks from owning guns. Its horrible
 
I am not on trial. You are also a racist gun banner. You want to ban blacks from owning guns. Its horrible

Like Billy Pilgrim was unstuck in time, you've become unstuck in reality.

The only gun ownership restrictions I support can be found in 18 USC 922g:

The Gun Control Act (GCA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), makes it unlawful for certain categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person:

convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
who is a fugitive from justice;

who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);

who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
who is an illegal alien;

who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;
who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner; or

who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
 
Like Billy Pilgrim was unstuck in time, you've become unstuck in reality.

The only gun ownership restrictions I support can be found in 18 USC 922g:

The Gun Control Act (GCA), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), makes it unlawful for certain categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person:

convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
who is a fugitive from justice;

who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);

who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
who is an illegal alien;

who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;
who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner; or

who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

I don't believe your claims. You certainly don't believe mine.
 
You can't even support your claims when asked.

Does gun control work in Japan?

You can't support your claims either. You blame blacks for all gun violence. You are a gun banner
 
Quote my post directly



Bucky stated this (and called for bans as well later in the thread=here he hints at them)

I pray for the gun nuts that want to do nothing about killers going into our schools and community shooting up innocent people. They were able to do so based on lax gun laws. Any reasonable laws that make it harder to kill people, I am all for.

No reasonable person would disagree

Here is Bucky explaining what he thinks are REASONABLE gun control
Yes, criminals, even gangsters see themselves as part of society. Even when criminals break the law they still play by certain rules.

I'd suggest you educate yourself. Gun control works. I hope the United States adopts a similar law to Japan:



How Japan has almost eradicated gun crime - BBC News

It doesn't take someone from Harvard to realize six gun deaths in Japan is less than 33,599 in the United States.

then we have this which clearly implies he wants to limit legal gun ownership

this is from the first 1000 or so posts in ONE thread. We have him agreeing with Bucky who wants to ban guns, We have him saying other first world countries (almost all that have gun bans) laws make them safer. and best of all, he admits that his support of gun control laws is to harass "gun nuts" (such as me and other posters as he admits) not criminals. He also said its "just a form" at least 15 times on that one thread. If you read all thousands of posts he has made, its obvious he is a gun banner despite his lies claiming he isn't

Legal gun owners kill thousands of people a year

I support restricting the rights of honest people in the faint hope it might slightly delay the actions of people who commit crimes.....

if its just a form. And it is.

Nope. Gun control saves lives

gun registration doesn't lead to gun bans. I agree

If it is a restricted firearm it should be confiscated

We have gun confiscation in the US without registration

vegas praising countries with laws far more than JUST A FORM

That would be this guy. Its a form. As I JUST SHOWED people in other countries go to MUCH greater lengths to be able to own a gun. And they do have guns. We ask you to fill out a form and it is the end of the world. Time to stop the madness and get some common sense gun control in this country.

Freedom does not do a lot for you when you are six feet under

Over and over again the gun nuts refuse to accept that first world countries with effective gun control have a fraction of the gun deaths per capita that we do. The experiment has been tried over and over, in country after country, but they will refuse to see it.

Gun control works. It saves lives

Here he explains why he really wants gun control-its not about criminals

No I think we need to enact reasonable gun control to keep the gun nuts in line and put an end to their stupid nonsense

All gun nuts have to be watched closely....even the ones on these forums.
 
Bucky stated this (and called for bans as well later in the thread=here he hints at them)





Here is Bucky explaining what he thinks are REASONABLE gun control


then we have this which clearly implies he wants to limit legal gun ownership

this is from the first 1000 or so posts in ONE thread. We have him agreeing with Bucky who wants to ban guns, We have him saying other first world countries (almost all that have gun bans) laws make them safer. and best of all, he admits that his support of gun control laws is to harass "gun nuts" (such as me and other posters as he admits) not criminals. He also said its "just a form" at least 15 times on that one thread. If you read all thousands of posts he has made, its obvious he is a gun banner despite his lies claiming he isn't













vegas praising countries with laws far more than JUST A FORM







Here he explains why he really wants gun control-its not about criminals

Where is the part I supported a gun ban. You just outed yourself as a liar. Thanks
 
You can't support your claims either.

No, I provide plenty of data and cites. What I can't do is get you to answer a simple question.

You blame blacks for all gun violence. You are a gun banner

Seriously psychotic behavior here. Seek professional help.
 
You can't support your claims either. You blame blacks for all gun violence. You are a gun banner
vegas cannot even keep his lies straight Now its Rucker who is the racist gun banner-and that is from the guy who obsesses over black felons being able to buy guns from private sellers.
 
No, I provide plenty of data and cites. What I can't do is get you to answer a simple question.



Seriously psychotic behavior here. Seek professional help.

I asked you a simple question. You weasled out
 
=vegas giants;1067650227]I don't know how many different times and ways I have to say I don't support gun bans.
vegas have you ever thought(which requires thinking)that some of the BS you come up with even if you may not have literally said "I WANT GUNS BANNED" sure as the hell sounds like you do?
If I were to put a gun free zone sign in my yard especially with quotations from the Mommies and Brady Bunch,you would think me a gun banner.And rightfully so.
If that is not direct enough for you then nothing is and you will join in TD's lies about me rather than call for honesty so we can ACTUALLY DEBATE GUN CONTROL.
From what I have seen you are not interested. You seem to busy making accusations that you won't back up. Yet as TD noted you back up Bucky even if as you say your all pro gun and Bucky backs you. At least most of the time Bucky will debate something.
His goal is to derail this thread everytime and he is very successful
Sorry but that seems to be your job.
 
Where is the part I supported a gun ban. You just outed yourself as a liar. Thanks

where you agreed with Bucky. where you talk about other first world nations being safer, and best yet, I love how you admit you push gun control to harass "gun nuts" not criminals. There are fifteen or so other threads that you have filled with your lies, shall I go through a couple more and find more? WORKS GREAT, MAKES US SAFE, JUST A FORM
 
vegas have you ever thought(which requires thinking)that some of the BS you come up with even if you may not have literally said "I WANT GUNS BANNED" sure as the hell sounds like you do?
If I were to put a gun free zone sign in my yard especially with quotations from the Mommies and Brady Bunch,you would think me a gun banner.And rightfully so.

From what I have seen you are not interested. You seem to busy making accusations that you won't back up. Yet as TD noted you back up Bucky even if as you say your all pro gun and Bucky backs you. At least most of the time Bucky will debate something.

Sorry but that seems to be your job.

I defend myself against people who lie about me
 
Back
Top Bottom