• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Under Trump, gun sales fall dramatically

I find it sad that people will play with semantics when the fact remains it is INCREDIBLY easy for a criminal to buy an untraceable gun in this country.

That is because it is incredibly easy for a criminal (convicted felon) to roam freely among us. Whether such a criminal (convicted felon) possess a traceable or untraceable gun is not the issue - it is already a crime (felony) for that prohibited person to possess a gun.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/felon-in-possession-of-a-weapon-laws.html
 
Vegas, they don't understand. People need driver's license to drive. Their license could be revoked if they drive drunk. We should have the same expectation (if not more) for using a gun.

I agree - convicted felons should lose any and all state issued privileges long before they lose any constitutional rights.
 
That is because it is incredibly easy for a criminal (convicted felon) to roam freely among us. Whether such a criminal (convicted felon) possess a traceable or untraceable gun is not the issue - it is already a crime (felony) for that prohibited person to possess a gun.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/felon-in-possession-of-a-weapon-laws.html

We make the process incredibly easy for a criminal to buy a gun. And we already incarcerate more people per capita than anyone.
 
We make the process incredibly easy for a criminal to buy a gun. And we already incarcerate more people per capita than anyone.

Yep, and here you are calling for more laws to add to that prison population. ;)

Basically, you are proposing continuing to allow known (convicted) dangerous felons to roam freely among us and locking up those that might possess or sell an unregistered gun.
 
Yep, and here you are calling for more laws to add to that prison population. ;)

Basically, you are proposing letting known dangerous felons roam freely among us and locking up those that might possess or sell an unregistered gun.

Most gun control laws are preventative in nature
 
Yep, and we already have laws that make it a serious crime (felony) for a prohibited person to simply possess a gun.

And they do not work. We need better laws
 
And they do not work. We need better laws

They would work much better if they were simply enforced. The problem is that many refuse to do so - they appear to see it as "unfair" that one could get a prison sentence of up to 10 years for simply having a gun in their home/car when they got less than that as a sentence for their original felony (or felonies). Morons allow folks to lie on form 4473 (a felony that can get you up to 5 years in prison) and seem completely satisfied with having denied that single attempt to illegally buy a gun. Do you really think that is a good idea?
 
They would work much better if they were simply enforced. The problem is that many refuse to do so - they appear to see it as "unfair" that one could get a prison sentence of up to 10 years for simply having a gun in their home/car when they got less than that as a sentence for their original felony (or felonies). Morons allow folks to lie on form 4473 (a felony that can get you up to 5 years in prison) and seem completely satisfied with having denied that single attempt to illegally buy a gun. Do you really think that is a good idea?

NO ONE wants to enforce those laws. NO ONE. Certainly not trump and the republicans, we need better laws
 
NO ONE wants to enforce those laws. NO ONE. Certainly not trump and the republicans, we need better laws

What makes you think that the new law will be enforced any better?
 
It works quite well in canada

We don't use Canadian Mounties to enforce our laws on US soil.

Who will be enforcing this law any better? The cops? The courts? Be specific to explain why laws that actually can't be enforced will be enforced better than current laws against felons?
 
We don't use Canadian Mounties to enforce our laws on US soil.

Who will be enforcing this law any better? The cops? The courts? Be specific to explain why laws that actually can't be enforced will be enforced better than current laws against felons?

The laws will be preventative in nature. Very few people are arrested for crimes with fully auto weapons. They are heavily restricted. Gun control works
 
The laws will be preventative in nature. Very few people are arrested for crimes with fully auto weapons. They are heavily restricted. Gun control works

I guess those heavy restrictions are why cocaine, meth, and heroin can't be found anywhere in the US.
 
The laws will be preventative in nature. Very few people are arrested for crimes with fully auto weapons. They are heavily restricted. Gun control works
They are heavily restricted thanks to the NFA of 1934 but do you think the people committing the crimes were first time offenders, or were they already criminals that just forgot to register their class 3 firearm they probably obtained illegally. Key words here are "arrested for crimes" not arrested for "fully auto weapons".
"The laws will be preventative in nature." Is that like saying it's a no,no and no one will break that law?
 
Last edited:
They are heavily restricted thanks to the NFA of 1934 but do you think the people committing the crimes were first time offenders, or were they already criminals that just forgot to register their class 3 firearm they probably obtained illegally. Key words here are "arrested for crimes" not arrested for "fully auto weapons".
"The laws will be preventative in nature." Is that like saying it's a no,no and no one will break that law?
Works pretty well for full auto weapons
 
Works pretty well for full auto weapons
So do you really think that's why everyone doesn't own a full auto weapon? If gun control works sooo good in that regard why do you need more? All full auto is is fire suppression and a waste of ammo,fun granted but a waste. Not to mention most people don't have thousands to pay for one.
 
The burden is on the government to help prevent felons from getting guns. There is an inadequacy OR LOOPHOOLE in the BGC system

There is a problem in the system. NOT the law. The law is clear...felon...illegal. Ergo...no loophole. Now. I'm not a lawyer. I have debated this issue 1000 times and I am interested in legal history and so on. But this quote SHOULD clear up the confusion on why there is no loophole as you define it...

Loopholes are distinct from lacunae, although the two terms are often used interchangeably. In a loophole, a law addressing a certain issue exists, but the law can be legally circumvented due to a technical defect in the said law. A lacuna, on the other hand, is a situation whereby no law exists in the first place to address that particular issue.

Do you see? The importance is that the law must be LEGALLY circumvented for it to be a loophole. It CANNOT be legally circumvented by a felon. There is no flaw legally speaking. There is a flaw in the practical application. Which is an important distinction BECAUSE one would require additional legislation. Another requires additional enforcement. And more important...one would find common ground for republicans and democrats and the other does not.

I know. I've already stated enforcement is a bag of cats somewhere on here. But if we can at least be realistic here...we make this a bag with one cat rather than bag of cats.
 
You want to seriously kill gun sales? Have the Democrats quit trying to put more gun control in place.

Every since the word "Gun Control" was invented, I have never once been restricted from Lawfully Buying a Gun ... not one single time in all my 50 years.

... and I live in Illinois :roll:
 
Every since the word "Gun Control" was invented, I have never once been restricted from Lawfully Buying a Gun ... not one single time in all my 50 years.

... and I live in Illinois :roll:


"Lawfully". Funny how that word has so much more behind it in Illinois than in nearly every other state. Prior to July 1, 2013, I could lawfully sell a hunting rifle to my brother without government involvement. Now I need forms, time, and cash, or I'm a criminal.
 
"Lawfully". Funny how that word has so much more behind it in Illinois than in nearly every other state. Prior to July 1, 2013, I could lawfully sell a hunting rifle to my brother without government involvement. Now I need forms, time, and cash, or I'm a criminal.

What's the big secret ... I sold my brother a car; it took me all of 15 minutes in title exchanges

... sure is cheaper than getting Married, Divorced or buying a Car of House.
 
Every since the word "Gun Control" was invented, I have never once been restricted from Lawfully Buying a Gun ... not one single time in all my 50 years.

... and I live in Illinois :roll:

go try to buy a machine gun made after May 19, 1986

go try to buy a normal capacity GLOCK magazine in NY or California or Connecticut or Maryland

Go try to buy a normal version of an AR 15 in California

your anecdotal argument is a complete fail
 
What's the big secret ... I sold my brother a car; it took me all of 15 minutes in title exchanges

... sure is cheaper than getting Married, Divorced or buying a Car of House.

But you see these forms used for guns are made out of a special kryptonite that kills gun nuts. LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom