• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A valid lesson from a well known Liberal legal Icon

TurtleDude said:
how about citing the article properly so I can take it apart. note however, what he is saying that the second amendment stands for
Click to expand...

Did you cite your article properly? Why do the rules only apply to me. This article was from BREITBART
 
vegas giants said:
Did you cite your article properly? Why do the rules only apply to me. This article was from BREITBART
Click to expand...

so where can I click on your post and be directly taken to the article?
 
TurtleDude said:
so where can I click on your post and be directly taken to the article?
Click to expand...

Yeah where can I do that in your post. You know everyone can see this OBVIOUS HYPOCRISY
 
vegas giants said:
Did you cite your article properly? Why do the rules only apply to me. This article was from BREITBART
Click to expand...

are you able to understand that Dershowitz is anti gun but even he admits that the second amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms? I guess you didn't understand that point when you sort of cited that article
 
vegas giants said:
Yeah where can I do that in your post. You know everyone can see this OBVIOUS HYPOCRISY
Click to expand...

I was listening to Dershowitz and quoted what he said. I never claimed it came from an article. you quoted an article and you didn't properly cite it
 
TurtleDude said:
are you able to understand that Dershowitz is anti gun but even he admits that the second amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms? I guess you didn't understand that point when you sort of cited that article
Click to expand...

Well maybe if you properly posted the article. This is my favorite part

What is needed is some very tough legislation both on the federal and state level to make it much, much harder to get guns and to create a presumption against gun ownership instead of a presumption in favor of gun ownership, consistent with the well-regulated militia language of the Second Amendment.
 
TurtleDude said:
I was listening to Dershowitz and quoted what he said. I never claimed it came from an article. you quoted an article and you didn't properly cite it
Click to expand...

And I don't believe you.


Oooooh Wayne La Pierre just said he is pro gun control.


Trust me. LOL
 
vegas giants said:
Well maybe if you properly posted the article. This is my favorite part

What is needed is some very tough legislation both on the federal and state level to make it much, much harder to get guns and to create a presumption against gun ownership instead of a presumption in favor of gun ownership, consistent with the well-regulated militia language of the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...

now you are claiming to be a gun banner. have you actually figured out what you actually believe about guns other than you don't like the politics of the NRA and gun owners?
 
TurtleDude said:
now you are claiming to be a gun banner. have you actually figured out what you actually believe about guns other than you don't like the politics of the NRA and gun owners?
Click to expand...

You mean like you claimed to be a gun banner SPECIFICALLY on this forum. Do you want to go down this road again. Should I report it this time?
 
OK Vegas

simple yes or no answers on the following

do you support

1) the ban on private citizens owning machine guns made after May 19, 1986

2) magazine limits of any type

3) private citizens being banned from owning any type of firearm even if they have a clear record

4) waiting periods before honest people can buy a gun

5)a limit on the number of guns you can buy in a given period of time

my answer to these is as follows

I don't believe in any federal limits on the number and type of firearms a lawful US Citizen should be able to own or possess buy or sell at all

so tell us-what are your views

I answered first so we don't get this nonsense of not answering until someone else does
 
I think we can put this in the win column. Good night


Drops mic....
 
vegas giants said:
Prepare to be destroyed

Alan Dershowitz: 2nd Amendment 'An Absurd Thing' In Our Constitution - Breitbart
Click to expand...

of course I know what he has said. that is why I used him. He's an anti gun left-winger who wants the second amendment repealed. that he admits that the second amendment does protect a right he despises is why his quote I started this thread with is so valuable. HE HATES that honest citizens can own firearms. but EVEN HE admits that as long as the second amendment exists, he is going to have to live with that fact.
 
vegas giants said:
I think we can put this in the win column. Good night


Drops mic....
Click to expand...

gonna run away before you answer an easy question? looks like its you the rest of the board will see as the loser
 
TurtleDude said:
OK Vegas

simple yes or no answers on the following

do you support

1) the ban on private citizens owning machine guns made after May 19, 1986

2) magazine limits of any type

3) private citizens being banned from owning any type of firearm even if they have a clear record

4) waiting periods before honest people can buy a gun

5)a limit on the number of guns you can buy in a given period of time

my answer to these is as follows

I don't believe in any federal limits on the number and type of firearms a lawful US Citizen should be able to own or possess buy or sell at all

so tell us-what are your views

I answered first so we don't get this nonsense of not answering until someone else does
Click to expand...
One more before I go to bed.


Do you support the right of a state TO BAN FIREARMS from violent offenders who have been convicted of their crimes?
 
vegas giants said:
One more before I go to bed.


Do you support the right of a state TO BAN FIREARMS from violent offenders who have been convicted of their crimes?
Click to expand...


sorry, you need to answer the pending question. I did

btw states don't have rights, they have powers so your stupid question is a fail
 
TurtleDude said:
sorry, you need to answer the pending question. I did

btw states don't have rights, they have powers so your stupid question is a fail
Click to expand...

I ran into Vegas earlier today. He thinks the Constitution creates rights, so don't expect much regarding rights. I guess you have a new Haymarket. Best of luck! haha
 
TurtleDude said:
gonna run away before you answer an easy question? looks like its you the rest of the board will see as the loser
Click to expand...
That's the way I see it. And I see what you mean about Dershowitz being anti gun,lets hope he never gets in a position to do anything.;)
 
zsu2357 said:
That's the way I see it. And I see what you mean about Dershowitz being anti gun,lets hope he never gets in a position to do anything.;)
Click to expand...

Dershowitz is a turd when it comes to guns but he's far more honest than some of his like minded leftwing academics. At least he admits that the second amendment guarantees an individual right and that courts cannot merely interpret it away.
 
Yeah that Dershowitz is wicked smart

What is needed is some very tough legislation both on the federal and state level to make it much, much harder to get guns and to create a presumption against gun ownership instead of a presumption in favor of gun ownership, consistent with the well-regulated militia language of the Second Amendment.
 
zsu2357 said:
That's the way I see it. And I see what you mean about Dershowitz being anti gun,lets hope he never gets in a position to do anything.;)
Click to expand...

Yeah, but then, the way you see it I'm trying to force our (Canada) gun laws down your throat, so that's how much value your observations have.
 
vegas giants said:
Yeah that Dershowitz is wicked smart

What is needed is some very tough legislation both on the federal and state level to make it much, much harder to get guns and to create a presumption against gun ownership instead of a presumption in favor of gun ownership, consistent with the well-regulated militia language of the Second Amendment.
Click to expand...

which is how a gun banner thinks. we should create a presumption that those who want to ban or limit gun ownership by honest people to be part of the group that fears honest people being armed.
 
TurtleDude said:
which is how a gun banner thinks. we should create a presumption that those who want to ban or limit gun ownership by honest people to be part of the group that fears honest people being armed.
Click to expand...

Reported
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom