• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

D.C. officials didn't learn gun lesson yet.

vegas giants said:
Nor any evidence that you understand it either
Click to expand...

the evidence I understand is stuff that proves that the idiotic Canadian Gun registry has actually caused violent crime in Canada to diminish. Such evidence does not exist. Having someone who merely engages in what appears to be parrot squawking of claims without proof doesn't have any use
 
TurtleDude said:
the evidence I understand is stuff that proves that the idiotic Canadian Gun registry has actually caused violent crime in Canada to diminish. Such evidence does not exist. Having someone who merely engages in what appears to be parrot squawking of claims without proof doesn't have any use
Click to expand...

https://c479107.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/31579/width668/4cfhjdjb-1379512958.jpg

The societies above are selected to demonstrate the European range of gun homicide rates as compared with three other societies (Australia, Canada and India) and the USA. Norway, Sweden, Finland and Switzerland all have relatively high rates of gun ownership, likewise Canada and Australia, but nowhere near the US rates of gun violence. None of the European societies has been immune from the experience of “mass shooting” incidents and most have strengthened their guns laws as a consequence.
 
vegas giants said:
https://c479107.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/31579/width668/4cfhjdjb-1379512958.jpg

The societies above are selected to demonstrate the European range of gun homicide rates as compared with three other societies (Australia, Canada and India) and the USA. Norway, Sweden, Finland and Switzerland all have relatively high rates of gun ownership, likewise Canada and Australia, but nowhere near the US rates of gun violence. None of the European societies has been immune from the experience of “mass shooting” incidents and most have strengthened their guns laws as a consequence.
Click to expand...

that proves nothing. did you even read it?
 
vegas giants said:
Relax chicken little....no one is coming for your guns. LOL
Click to expand...

some gullible sheeple in England believed that too. All one has to do is read the posts of the anti gun types on this board and envision what those posters would do if they were actually in a position of power. Given so posts dripping bile towards gun owners, banning guns would be the least severe of what I suspect would come from some of our anti gun types
 
TurtleDude said:
some gullible sheeple in England believed that too. All one has to do is read the posts of the anti gun types on this board and envision what those posters would do if they were actually in a position of power. Given so posts dripping bile towards gun owners, banning guns would be the least severe of what I suspect would come from some of our anti gun types
Click to expand...

Hear that....its the black helicopters! Get to the bunker....they are coming for your guns!!! LOL
 
vegas giants said:
Hear that....its the black helicopters! Get to the bunker....they are coming for your guns!!! LOL
Click to expand...

your stupid and inane nonsense might have some worth if you had something personally at stake if the government actually did try to confiscate guns as it has in NYC, NJ, and California.
 
TurtleDude said:
your stupid and inane nonsense might have some worth if you had something personally at stake if the government actually did try to confiscate guns as it has in NYC, NJ, and California.
Click to expand...

Settle down dude. This is suppossed to be fun. Its just a debate. LOL
 
vegas giants said:
Settle down dude. This is suppossed to be fun. Its just a debate. LOL
Click to expand...

I have fun annihilating the disingenuous, dishonest and inane arguments of the anti gun left. If you don't actually believe the stuff you post, then that is on you, not me
 
TurtleDude said:
I have fun annihilating the disingenuous, dishonest and inane arguments of the anti gun left. If you don't actually believe the stuff you post, then that is on you, not me
Click to expand...

When are you going to start? LOL Come on....that was funny
 
ludin said:
Appeals court blocks DC's concealed-carry law on Second Amendment grounds | Fox News

D.C. requires gun owners to have a “good reason” to obtain a concealed carry permit.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down the regulation as too restrictive in a 2-1 decision, The Washington Post reported.

“The good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on most D.C. residents’ right to carry a gun in the face of ordinary self-defense needs,” Judge Thomas B. Griffith wrote, according to the paper.

Here is a good reason to have a concealed permit I want one and have a right to have it.

Of course like dentists there is always that one doctor.

The lone dissenter, Judge Karen Henderson, said the district’s regulation “passes muster” because of the city’s unique security challenges as the nation’s capital and because it does not affect the right to keep a firearm at home.

What does this judge not get? Ol yea the constitution.

A gun does me no good at home when I am mugged on the street.
Click to expand...

I have come to the conclusion that anti-2nd amendment trash deliberately enact laws like these because they know it will take a awhile before they get struck down.Which depending on how long that takes may create a generation of people who don't exercise their 2nd amendment rights.Which if that happens then they are less likely to defend their right to keep and bear arms. For example DC vs Heller took over 30 years to happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom