• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

National Voter Registry vs Gun Registry

calamity said:
So, then by interpoltion, a voter registry is indeed a means toward voter suppression.
Click to expand...

only in the sense that it prevents people who are not legitimate voters from voting. Its like saying requiring a membership card to access the facilities at a health club suppresses use of the club facilities. Yes it does-it keeps those who haven't paid their dues out.
 
Not a issue when 47 of the 50 states won't comply
 
Cigar said:
Are you playing or are you for real? :roll:
Click to expand...

is Trump hate your only reason for being on this thread or do you want to explain why so many progressives think a disarmed population is "progress"?
 
TurtleDude said:
is Trump hate your only reason for being on this thread or do you want to explain why so many progressives think a disarmed population is "progress"?
Click to expand...

Got it ... :doh

I'm a Liberal Progressive and I Love Guns ... explain that Mr Know It All

Next! :2razz:
 
Cigar said:
Come-on ... we're all adults here, we all know exactly what this is about.

Donny Trump's delicate thin-skinned feelings were hurt because Hillary got more popular Votes than him, so it had to be Voter Fraud.

... yea .... 3 to 5 Million Vote were fraudulent.

Didn't "W" already suffer this humiliation defeat over Voter Fraud?
Click to expand...

I remember Jill Stein raising millions of dollars to do a recount in multiple states because the left was but hurt they lost the electoral college.And the left praised her for it.

BTW I am no Trump fan, I didn't vote for him in the primary and I didn't vote him in the general. I criticized Trump-tard for saying the man is a outsider, the man tells it like it is, or the man is a conservative. The fact Trump switched his positions multiple times proves he doesn't tell it like it is.The fact praised, supported and donated money to liberal democrat and RINO republicans and supported liberal issues and hung out with the Clintons on multiple occasions proves he is no conservative and no outsider.
 
TurtleDude said:
only in the sense that it prevents people who are not legitimate voters from voting. Its like saying requiring a membership card to access the facilities at a health club suppresses use of the club facilities. Yes it does-it keeps those who haven't paid their dues out.
Click to expand...

What's to stop some with nefarious motives from finding flaws in the paperwork of voters registered to or having voting histories to the wrong party? That's no more outlandish than this fear that a gun registry will lead to gun confiscation.
 
Cigar said:
Got it ... :doh

I'm a Liberal Progressive and I Love Guns ... explain that Mr Know It All

Next! :2razz:
Click to expand...

then you are like a few others on this board who are far left and pretend not to be anti gun-your main issue is attacking those on the right who bash the fact that its the left that invariably tries to piss on the second amendment. Yo might not be anti gun but you are anti pro gun posters because most of us correctly note that gun restrictions are almost always a left wing disease.

it must scald your hide to know that pro gun posters almost alway vote for politicians who find the progressive malignancy a most unwholesome political movement.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
It means you are confused and vote against your own interest.
Click to expand...

No more so than a poor person voting Republican. Or someone on disability, medicare, social security or even anyone breathing air and drinking water. :roll:
 
calamity said:
What's to stop some with nefarious motives from finding flaws in the paperwork of voters registered to or having voting histories to the wrong party? That's no more outlandish than this fear that a gun registry will lead to gun confiscation.
Click to expand...

this is another thread where you are upset with alleged actions by conservatives (keeping improper voters off the roles and perhaps making it tougher for slow witted, or low wattage individuals from voting) and you think that the way to get even for your pique is to argue or insinuate in favor of more restrictions on gun owners.

its a dishonest tactic and no one can possibly believe your claims anymore that you are not against gun restrictions. I counted all the threads you have started since the election on gun issues and everyone of them is anti gun
 
Cigar said:
Got it ... :doh

I'm a Liberal Progressive and I Love Guns ... explain that Mr Know It All

Next! :2razz:
Click to expand...

So I take it that you did not vote for Clinton considering her support for anti-2nd amendment laws and the fact she has praise UK and Australian gun control? Nor did you vote for Jill Stein due to her support for anti-2nd amendment laws as well and the fact she spews the usually anti-2nd amendment rhetoric as well?
 
calamity said:
No more so than a poor person voting Republican. Or someone on disability, medicare, social security or even anyone breathing air and drinking water. :roll:
Click to expand...

that's based on the idiotic assumption that the best way to handle addicts is to give them more drugs. Many people realize that dependency saps initiative and those who are stuck sucking on the public tit will never be successful
 
TurtleDude said:
this is another thread where you are upset with alleged actions by conservatives (keeping improper voters off the roles and perhaps making it tougher for slow witted, or low wattage individuals from voting) and you think that the way to get even for your pique is to argue or insinuate in favor of more restrictions on gun owners.

its a dishonest tactic and no one can possibly believe your claims anymore that you are not against gun restrictions. I counted all the threads you have started since the election on gun issues and everyone of them is anti gun
Click to expand...

huh??
 
TurtleDude said:
that's based on the idiotic assumption that the best way to handle addicts is to give them more drugs. Many people realize that dependency saps initiative and those who are stuck sucking on the public tit will never be successful
Click to expand...

Easy to say for someone born with a silver spoon who never tasted poverty. :roll:
 
calamity said:
huh??
Click to expand...

you constantly start threads suggesting that if pro gun posters support

1) Trump's immigration policy

2) restrictions on abortion or gay sodomy

3) restrictions on fraudulent voting

its only rational for others to try to impose restrictions on gun rights as payback

and that is what this stupid thread is suggesting
 
jamesrage said:
So I take it that you did not vote for Clinton considering her support for anti-2nd amendment laws and the fact she has praise UK and Australian gun control? Nor did you vote for Jill Stein due to her support for anti-2nd amendment laws as well and the fact she spews the usually anti-2nd amendment rhetoric as well?
Click to expand...

When did Clinton propose a Bill to Congress?
 
calamity said:
Easy to say for someone born with a silver spoon who never tasted poverty. :roll:
Click to expand...

or for me who has never been ignorant or unlearned on these issues as well.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Probably because voting is a civil right, reserved for citizens of a country.

The right of self defense is a natural right and is not granted by citizenship.
Click to expand...

A natural right granted by slave owners and rapists
Great to live by
 
TurtleDude said:
or for me who has never been ignorant or unlearned on these issues as well.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between enabling bad decisions and throwing poor people to the wolves, while polluting their air and water.
 
Cigar said:
When did Clinton propose a Bill to Congress?
Click to expand...

1) clinton could not because she LOST

She promised if she WON she would push for the Clinton Gun ban to be reinstated and made PERMANENT and she wanted to REPEAL the law that prevents frivolous law suits against gun makers (like the morons who sued Remington because a Remington made rifle was stolen from its lawful owner and used at Sandyhook)

2) She also stated that the SUPREME COURT incorrectly held that the second amendment recognized an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT and she suggested the Justices she would appoint would overturn Heller.

Did you miss all of that during the campaign?
 
Cigar said:
When did Clinton propose a Bill to Congress?
Click to expand...

Being anti-2A does not require proposing a Bill to Congress. She did however run on these points:

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/gun-violence-prevention/

Other links:

Hillary believes the Supreme Court “Got it wrong” when it said the 2nd protects an individual right not connected with service in the militia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lP3wjxJwlk
Page not found - Washington Free Beacon

She believes ‘assault weapons’ should be banned.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...t-one-expired/


She believes it is ‘worth looking at” an Aussie-style mandatory buy back of firearms, followed by confiscation of weapons not surrendered
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b02f6a900c5d67
 
calamity said:
There's a difference between enabling bad decisions and throwing poor people to the wolves, while polluting their air and water.
Click to expand...

many on the left-especially laborites have noted that the environmental extremism of the yuppie left hurts the working poor by curtailing employment opportunities so wealthy yuppies can have more room to hike and bike
 
Cigar said:
When did Clinton propose a Bill to Congress?
Click to expand...

So she was only lying about supporting anti-2nd amendment laws and lying when she praised UK and Australian style gun control laws?
 
TurtleDude said:
many on the left-especially laborites have noted that the environmental extremism of the yuppie left hurts the working poor by curtailing employment opportunities so wealthy yuppies can have more room to hike and bike
Click to expand...

Guess what else studies show? Millennials do not want to work in coal mines or factories. I wonder why...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom