Less than 1%. This is not rocket science. 99.9% of FFL holders are legal and sell legally. There are already laws against the illegal sale of guns. So you want to punish the majority for legally practicing a right due to the 1% who break the law? I mean that is what you are getting at.
Again why are you concentrating on a miniscule statistic? Let's say we could magically stop all legal gun owner from ever committing a crime again, what affect on crime would that have? It would not stop suicide, that's legal. It would not stop accidents, that's why we call them accidents. It would not stop criminals as they are already ignoring the law. So we would stop maybe 1% of the crime? This is what it appears you are trying to argue for. Lets ban all guns for 20% of the crime rather than address the real problems.
What a load of bull****. This statistic has been pretty constant for many years. A law abiding citizen is just that. So you can take that political agenda nonsense and stow it.
If we add to the murder count people who are legally allowed to own guns? I already posted the data. Do you ever bother to actually read what people post? Seriously?
n analysis of 762 crimes conducted by the college's Graduate School of Public Health shows that in nearly 80 percent of the crimes in which a gun was recovered by the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police Firearm Tracking Unit in 2008, the perpetrator was not the lawful owner of the gun. -
Most gun crimes not committed by legal gun owner, Pittsburgh study says - UPI.com
In the study, led by epidemiologist Anthony Fabio of Pittsburgh’s Graduate School of Public Health, researchers partnered with the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police to trace the origins of all 893 firearms that police recovered from crime scenes in the year 2008. They found that in approximately 8 out of 10 cases, the perpetrator was not a lawful gun owner but rather in illegal possession of a weapon that belonged to someone else. -
Study: the Vast Majority of Gun Crime Isn't Committed by Lawful Gun Owners | National Review
So what you said on top of making no sense at all, is totally false.
I am sorry but you have been shown to be completely wrong on all counts. It looks like you are desperately trying to push an untrue narrative to fit your ban them agenda. And it is a ban them all agenda obviously, just look at your posts. You don't appear to want reasonable answers and are constantly trying to play a game with the stats. If you actually cared about stopping gun crime, you would be looking at the lion's share rather than a small minority. Instead you push an unrealistic agenda that boils down to ban them all.