• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another Day, Another Shooting

Lets see the democrat governor of Virginia reacted to the assault on republicans by a far left gunman by calling for "more background checks" and pretending there is a "gun show loophole. He's too stupid to even understand what the laws are in the state where the shooter came from.

VA Gov Calls For Gun Control At Scene Of Scalise Shooting | The Daily Caller

a republican politician had a bit more sensible response

Rep. Chris Collins After Scalise Shooting: I'll Be Carrying Concealed at Next Game
 
I have seen enough of your posts to know that your evasive and oblique attacks on gun ownership is not based on any rational or logical suggestions to end violent crime but rather your disgust with the politicians the NRA and avid gun owners support. Why do you have such a hard time honestly stating what sort of laws you dream of concerning harassment of gun owners?

I know what happens when rational solutions are discussed in this section of the forum..... :roll:
 
I know what happens when rational solutions are discussed in this section of the forum..... :roll:

when you who want to ban guns come up with rational solutions, let us know. I have yet to see anything approaching rational (if rational means laws that actually have a good chance of actually decreasing violent crime committed by people who ignore the federal ban on them having guns already) coming from the anti gun left.

in fact I suggest the next rational solution proffered by you would be the first. Of course, to many gun banners, a rational law is one that harasses legal gun owners and impedes legal gun ownership. crime control is something gun banners give lip service to to appease or placate the low wattage sheeple
 
its because of the pathologies in their culture. why do the people in the USA with the most guns have the LOWEST rate of gun crime? Why does Switzerland, which has legal gun ownership have a far lower rate than England where all handguns are banned?

Pathologies in culture, huh?
 
the fact that a protection detail was able to start firing back fairly quickly is probably the main reason why the turd didn't hit more people. Very few active shooters have had any kind of training or experience that would allow them to make multiple hits on live targets while others are trying to shoot them

Point, it was one thing to punch paper, quite another when lead flies back at ya.
 
Point, it was one thing to punch paper, quite another when lead flies back at ya.

active shooters almost never practice the skills that will allow them to survive a confrontation with a properly trained citizen who is armed.
 
Back
Top Bottom