- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
We're not talking about cops here - you are. And an ABC News story on that incident says either a shot or ricochet was responsible as the cop was not trying to hit either but was trying to to scare the tiger Tiger Attacks Woman at Fund-Raiser - ABC News So your story as a comparison is getting weaker by the moment.
The fact is this - an idiot "law abiding citizen" almost killed a crime victim because said idiot should not have had a gun in the first place. THAT is my point, and not a'one of you in the gun crowd here can refute that. The fact that you divert as denial only shows how strong my point is to begin with.
we keep hearing you complaining about Idiots carrying guns but what we NEVER See is any rational or logical suggestion from you on how you prevent that without preventing good people from carrying. Rather you suggest that no one should be able to carry
and using your idiotic suggestion, you would ban everyone from driving because plenty of people who get driving licenses end up doing something stupid
but what it all boils down to is that in California, you cannot get a permit to carry because that state is run by anti gun scum bags who don't issue carry permits to most people, and you want no one else to be able to carry either