The huge an obvious difference is that "gun violence" was not replaced with "knife violence" and/or "car violence" - suddenly the tools used by the criminal lack any special importance at all. That is the key as to why the thread was placed here.
Um, the tweet CLEARLY said the "attacker" used vehicle and knife. Attacker means one committing the violent act.
I feel as if you (and whomever else agrees with you on this) are splitting hairs in an effort to find a way to be offended. If Kaine had said gun violence and then never corrected it, I could understand your argument. Heck, I'd agree with you (though for different reasons, I'm sure). But he did. As soon as information changed, his Twitter accounted corrected his previously inaccurate statement, using the word "attacker" with vehicle and knife, which indicates violence.
I feel as if you are missing the forest for the trees. You're criticizing the way he parsed the words in the second tweet while ignoring what the second tweet means and signifies.
For what it is worth, I know Internet tends to lose tone. Please understand my post towards you is not harsh nor sarcastic, as I genuinely enjoy and respect your posts, even if we don't always agree.
As to the intent (motive), I seriously doubt that makes the act (causing multiple student victims) any less "horrifying and senseless" to the victims, their families or their friends.
I couldn't say, I've been fortunate not to have to experience that. But I'm sure you recognize there's a HUGE difference in accidents and planned attacks, correct? Accidents happen all the time (though, admittedly, not with children dying on a school bus), but planned attacks on college campuses, where shots are fired (yes, by police) are not so common.
Like I said your reading comprehension is nonexistent
No, my reading comprehension is just fine. We both know why you didn't answer the question before. And the reason you didn't answer it before is why I insisted on you answering it plainly.
Once again you dont have it correct, you have not once in this entire thread had it correct.
I'm always correct. Just because what I'm saying doesn't align with what you want to hear, it doesn't make what I'm saying any less accurate.
I have already explained the difference between talking about a subject with misinformation and using that misinformation to push a political agenda.
Yes and I already said this thread is a great example of using misinformation to push a political agenda. I've already demonstrated that.
What you have not done, at any point, is show that Kaine deliberately used misinformation to push an agenda. That's all been in your head and that's why I keep referring to other posters. Just like TD or Kal simply posted based on the information at hand, so did Kaine. So your made up belief that Kaine somehow knew it wasn't gun violence but claimed it anyways, all to institute whatever gun control measures you think he had in mind at the time while he twirled his evil mustache he doesn't have is just nonsense. As I have been trying to politely point out to you repeatedly.
In fairness, I don't think your problem was reading comprehension, I think the problem was you just don't care about the facts. You want to follow in the footsteps of the opening post and just get outraged, even if there's really nothing to be outraged about.
Perhaps we really do need a safe space, ttwtt.