• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bonney Lake woman hit in head by stray bullet identified, dies of wound

jet57 said:
Cops in the course of doing their jobs is one. An idiot with a gun running outside spraying the neighborhood with bullets at a fleeing vehicle is something else entirely. But of course, you know that.
Click to expand...

Cops shoot more bystanders than civilians. And civilians shoot more criminals than cops.

Look. We get it. You want people to be defenseless to criminals. That is the goal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
American said:
Do you know that he fired them all?
Click to expand...

His neighbors seem to believe he did? Have you bothered reading further into this with other articles? I have.

So please don't play this game with me......it's not like they live on the OK Corral.
 
RetiredUSN said:
His neighbors seem to believe he did? Have you bothered reading further into this with other articles? I have.

So please don't play this game with me......it's not like they live on the OK Corral.
Click to expand...

So what's the bottom line here? What do you want out of this?
 
American said:
So what's the bottom line here? What do you want out of this?
Click to expand...

Now..........you are being disingenuous.

You are the one that jumped on my post (#117)

I should be the one asking you. You have already accused me of gross exaggerations, and then I proved you wrong on that accusation.

So...........What's your point?
 
RetiredUSN said:
Now..........you are being disingenuous.

You are the one that jumped on my post (#117)

I should be the one asking you. You have already accused me of gross exaggerations, and then I proved you wrong on that accusation.

So...........What's your point?
Click to expand...

I think there were exaggerations, and I think you used them on purpose to make a point. So make the ****ing real point here. It ain't gun safety. I'm waiting. The thread wasn't post in THIS forum to mourn the death of this woman, because it's never that. It's tragic, but this forum is for something else.
 
American said:
I think there were exaggerations, and I think you used them on purpose to make a point. So make the ****ing real point here. It ain't gun safety. I'm waiting. The thread wasn't post in THIS forum to mourn the death of this woman, because it's never that. It's tragic, but this forum is for something else.
Click to expand...

The man took upwards of 10 shots and ended up killing a innocent lady by spraying shots at a car.

He's a moron and deserves to be in jail for a very very long time.

And now you are trying to justify your attack about my post #117............ by continuing a unjustified accusation, in which you were proved wrong.

You got butt hurt, so keep plugging away wildly..............just like the shooter did.
 
RetiredUSN said:
The man took upwards of 10 shots and ended up killing a innocent lady by spraying shots at a car.

He's a moron and deserves to be in jail for a very very long time.

And now you are trying to justify your attack about my post #117............ by continuing a unjustified accusation, in which you were proved wrong.

You got butt hurt, so keep plugging away wildly..............just like the shooter did.
Click to expand...

So you have nothing more to say, misusing the old "butt hurt" meme. Is that all you have? I asked what you want to happen now. You want a law changed?
 
American said:
So you have nothing more to say, misusing the old "butt hurt" meme. Is that all you have? I asked what you want to happen now. You want a law changed?
Click to expand...

Do you support the shooter?

Do you believe that he was justified?
 
RetiredUSN said:
Do you support the shooter?

Do you believe that he was justified?
Click to expand...

What does that mean to support the shooter? I think he should have call the police on this incident. Now tell me what you ****ing want from this incident.
 
American said:
What does that mean to support the shooter? I think he should have call the police on this incident. Now tell me what you ****ing want from this incident.
Click to expand...

I already told you ................the prick needs to be in jail for a very long time.
 
American said:
Prove he sprayed the neighborhood. Your hyperbole is pathetic and laughable.
Click to expand...

The bullet that killed that woman was - a bit off target wouldn't you say?

A reasonable conclusion would be - he sprayed bullets trying to hit a fleeing vehicle.

Hence - another idiot with a gun.
 
blackjack50 said:
Cops shoot more bystanders than civilians. And civilians shoot more criminals than cops.

Look. We get it. You want people to be defenseless to criminals. That is the goal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
jet57 said:
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

Says the one who wants to impose restrictions on people's right, without due process, based on a rare incident that no amount of "common sense" control will stop.

Face it homie. You support whatever pipe dream gun ban comes next. Every time. "Assault bans" "clip restrictions." "Ghost guns" "pump shotguns." Handguns. Whatever. Doesn't matter. You will support it as long as you allow the puppet masters to pull the heart strings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
American said:
Just for show? You should have your gun rights taken away for that unnecessary shooting of an extra round, and spraying a bullet just for show purposes.
Click to expand...

I know. It's another argument for limiting rifles to single-shot capacity.

I always put another round into 'em. Then I poke 'em in the eye with a stick. I dread the thought of sticking a knife into a live deer.
 
Grand Mal said:
I know. It's another argument for limiting rifles to single-shot capacity.

I always put another round into 'em. Then I poke 'em in the eye with a stick. I dread the thought of sticking a knife into a live deer.
Click to expand...

Or 700 lb elk.
 
Rucker61 said:
Or 700 lb elk.
Click to expand...

Ow.
Never killed an elk, or a moose. Or a bear, for that matter, just deer and birds and small game.
Buddy of mine who's my age used to get a moose every year but the last time I saw him he told me he'd never kill another moose unless it was standing in the back of his pick-up truck. I figure a deer is enough of a workout- my son lives too far away to help me with an elk or a moose.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
What an amazing assertion.

Tell me, what data backs that up?

Please be very, very specific.
Click to expand...

You should be able to find that information easily. ITs well know that private citizens are less likely to miss the intended target than Cops and less likely to shoot the wrong person than cops. Its been posted before, and I really don't feel like googling something I have seen dozens of times on this board.

it makes sense private citizens shoot more criminals than cops-there are hell of lot more than them than cops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom