• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I support this policy by American Gun makers

jet57 said:
Not at all. The states are not going to play a stupid game of politics with their police forces.
Click to expand...

So you admit that the state will do exactly what is expected of them. You see, everyone knows that already because everyone knows that this little gun control game is really just a power trip by gun control advocates.
 
Henrin said:
:lol:

The point isn't to stand out the fight, but to get you to make a move proving them right about you.
Click to expand...


when a state or city government issues a type of weapon to its civilian police officers-that governmental unit is stating loudly and publicly, that the weapons so issued are the most suitable firearms for civilian employees to use for self defense in a civilian urban environment. How can any city official or politician then turn around and say such weapons have absolutely no legitimate use in the hands of lawful citizens to possess in their own homes?
 
Henrin said:
You need to pay attention. They know you want the state to be armed with guns you want banned for the people, they know that message will sell, and they know you will bite and prove them right if given the chance.
Click to expand...

Jet is on record saying that anything he cannot own in California, the rest of us shouldn't be allowed to own in other states. He has made the claim that any magazine of ten or more rounds is "for warfare only" and that an AR 15 is " weapon of war"

SO why are civilian police officers all carrying magazines designed "ONLY FOR WARFARE" and routinely carry rifles that were intended only for offensive "MILITARY PURPOSES"?
 
TurtleDude said:
One of the better known makers of AR 15 style rifles has this on their website. Ronnie Barrett, Maker of the famous 50 caliber Barrett long range rifles apparently has adopted the same policy and when LAPD wanted service done on their sniper rifles, Barrett was noted to tell LAPD (California banned 50 caliber rifles for private citizens) that they were "S.O.L."

here is what Spikes Tactical (turtle endorsed Btw) has to say

As of today, it will be our policy not to sell prohibited items to law enforcement agencies, government agencies and agents in states, counties, cities and municipalities that have enacted restrictive gun control laws against their citizens. We urge other companies to join in support.
Click to expand...

US arsenals have been getting, "off the hook" lately, anyway:

The Arsenal Act: Context and Legislative History
Congressional Research Service

Summary

The Arsenal Act (10 U.S.C. §4532) requires the Secretary of the Army to have all supplies needed by the Army to be made in government-owned factories or arsenals if this can be accomplished “on an economical basis.”
Click to expand...
 
danielpalos said:
US arsenals have been getting, "off the hook" lately, anyway:
Click to expand...


do you have any clue that this discussion involves CIVILIAN law enforcement agencies, not the military?
 
Henrin said:
So you admit that the state will do exactly what is expected of them. You see, everyone knows that already because everyone knows that this little gun control game is really just a power trip by gun control advocates.
Click to expand...

(chuckle)

Funny

No, TD's blowing smoke again and so is the manufacturer. The city and county of Los Angeles isn't going to enter into any deal with any manufacturer for product and service without a contract. What's going on here is that the contract is probably up and the city may not want to renew it, so this gun company is trying to make some sort of political point rather than lick their wounds.

It ain't gonna work, and you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
jet57 said:
(chuckle)

Funny

No, TD's blowing smoke again and so is the manufacturer. The city and county of Los Angeles isn't going to enter into any deal with any manufacturer for product and service without a contract. What's going on here is that the contract is probably up and the city may not want to renew it, so this gun company is trying to make some sort of political point rather than lick their wounds.

It ain't gonna work, and you have no idea what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

More lies from Jet. Spikes doesn't have a contract with LA. You just made that up. And they didn't single out the morons in California. It also applies to places like CT, Maryland, Mass. NJ and NY.

LAPD uses mainly Colt, Bushmaster and to a lesser extent H&K rifles

Its fun watching you claim that Henrin doesn't know what he's talking about when just about everything you post on gun issues is demonstrably WRONG

LAPD Equipment - Los Angeles Police Department
 
when LAPD wanted service done on their sniper rifles, Barrett was noted to tell LAPD (California banned 50 caliber rifles for private citizens) that they were "S.O.L."
Click to expand...

Just so's everybody knows. LAPD will nor the state of California will do business of this kind without contracts. The OP is made up BS that amounts to nothing.
 
jet57 said:
Just so's everybody knows. LAPD will nor the state of California will do business of this kind without contracts. The OP is made up BS that amounts to nothing.
Click to expand...



Non answer. Note that Jet quoted me in such a way I wouldn't get a notice. He's disrupting the thread with nonsense that has nothing to do with SPIKES' announcement. How is it made up "bs". I quoted from their own website. Maybe Jet will explain to us why he doesn't trust his neighbors and fellow citizens to own the same firearms that civilian police own. Is it projection?

its also complete BS. SPIKES will not enter into a contract with the state of california. So Jet's diversion is just that. saying something to say something without making any point
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom