• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"gun rights" [W:41]

ScrewPokemonGo said:
Guns have no rights. They are inanimate objects incapable of emotion or thought. As such these non living things have no rights to life like humans do. Please stop using the term gun rights. It's absurd. If you feel guns are people, then arrest them for mass murder.
Click to expand...

Let me help you there, to me it is arms ownership rights which are affirmed by the constitution. You can prostitute that as much as you like and base your premise on your wording but the fact remains they are the best form of self-defence we have.

You are absolutely right they are inanimate objects and not one of them has been prosecuted for murder, robbery, rape, assault or injury. Thus to ascribe human like qualities and demand they be removed in order to reduce crime or the supply to criminals is absolutely delusional and completely irrational.

What could be more absurd than basing a religion on controlling guns and glorifying this human like trait as if removal like some saviour will bring peace and goodwill throughout the land?
 
countryboy said:
The point has been made ad nauseam. We're right, you're wrong, that's the end of the story.
Click to expand...

Well, since you can't make you're point, or prove that I'm wrong, then that settles that.
 
jet57 said:
Well, since you can't make you're point, or prove that I'm wrong, then that settles that.
Click to expand...

The point has been made countless times, your idiotic grabber nonsense has been crushed. There's no point wasting any more time on you. Buh-Bye. :2wave:
 
jet57 said:
Okay, explain that please...

Bearing arms has a connotation to it, that's why the word was used.... Militia... citizen's army; bearing arms.
Click to expand...

Well regulated libraries being necessary to a good education, the right of the people to keep and read books, shall not be infringed.

Do you have the slightest problem understanding exactly what is meant?
 
countryboy said:
The point has been made countless times, your idiotic grabber nonsense has been crushed. There's no point wasting any more time on you. Buh-Bye. :2wave:
Click to expand...

Yeah, you have no proof.
 
jet57 said:
Yeah, you have no proof.
Click to expand...

I see more proof than say claims that the ONLY purpose for ten round magazines is for WARFARE The fact is-the second amendment is an individual right and its proper interpretation prevents Gun grabbing by dishonest politicians
 
ScrewPokemonGo said:
^
Jackass nazi who hated democracy
Click to expand...

Do you change IP addresses or are there that many people with the same warped thought process,/ I will go with go with the first choice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom