• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Second Amendment works again

jet57 said:
I think you're wrong on the subject of the sub forum.
Click to expand...

:shrug: You're prerogative. Doesn't mean you're right though.

jet57 said:
Secondly, I have already completely answered your other repetitive points so I'm no longer going to engage your diatribe.
Click to expand...

So you're not going to admit that there is a huge difference between 1 person defending himself unarmed against one assailant starting from close quarters vs 1 woman against 3 armed assailants? Because you have yet to do that in this entire thread. Or any other thread for that matter.

Why am I not surprised?
 
Kal'Stang said:
:shrug: You're prerogative. Doesn't mean you're right though.



So you're not going to admit that there is a huge difference between 1 person defending himself unarmed against one assailant starting from close quarters vs 1 woman against 3 armed assailants? Because you have yet to do that in this entire thread. Or any other thread for that matter.

Why am I not surprised?
Click to expand...

Because gun control advocates are predictable, made so by the circumstances and results of inculcation;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom