• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

91 year old man, robbed and.. oh wait, he was a CPL holder!

 
jet57 said:
Nooo, the lady knew what she was doing: she casually put the baby down and then beat the guy's ass.

Here's another one:




So, they're not getting lucky. As you can see, both of them know exactly what they're doing.

'Ya don't need a gun; just enough balls to face'em down.
Click to expand...


That was actually kind of nuts. She could have easily been shot there.
 
Henrin said:
That was actually kind of nuts. She could have easily been shot there.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but she was being brave: something people wandering around with guns don't know how to be.
 
Renae said:
Kids make mistakes when Parents are irresponsible.
Click to expand...

There seem to be an awful lot of them then given American children are some sixteen times more likely to be accidentally shot than in the rest of the developed world combined. :(
 
jet57 said:
And what's dishonest about a true story?
Click to expand...

Well the headline is not accurate, and the stats are not accurate, and its not even from this year.
 
jet57 said:
Yeah, but she was being brave: something people wandering around with guns don't know how to be.
Click to expand...

The gun was pointing right at her chest at a certain point in the struggle. It could have easily went off and killed her right there.
 
flogger said:
There seem to be an awful lot of them then given American children are some sixteen times more likely to be accidentally shot than in the rest of the developed world combined. :(
Click to expand...

You don't care about those kids, dancing on their graves for political gain... for shame
 
Renae said:
You don't care about those kids, in fact you relish their deaths because they help your little crusade.
Click to expand...

You just don't like the fact that I put your 'feel good' OP post into context.

Too bad :roll:
 
flogger said:
Prove it ?
Click to expand...

Its like comparing car deaths with deaths from vending machines falling on you. They aren't comparable at all. Toddlers killed in accidents are terrible events, just like car accidents. Plus, terrorists have killed tons recently, including in countries with very strict gun control. Oh, but we won't bring that up will we.
 
ajn678 said:
Its like comparing car deaths with deaths from vending machines falling on you. They aren't comparable at all. Toddlers killed in accidents are terrible events, just like car accidents. Plus, terrorists have killed tons recently, including in countries with very strict gun control. Oh, but we won't bring that up will we.
Click to expand...

So you can't prove it then

Fair enough :thumbs:
 
flogger said:
So you can't prove it then

Fair enough :thumbs:
Click to expand...

I already did. You posted something dishonest in hopes that people would agree that we should ban guns. In 2015 we had a low number of terrorist attacks on the mainland soil of the United States. Why don't we talk about 2016 though? How many has it been at this point now? Should we get rid of cars because people have accidents that kill babies? Its dishonest because it tries to compare two things that have nothing to do with one another.
 
ajn678 said:
I already did. You posted something dishonest in hopes that people would agree that we should ban guns. In 2015 we had a low number of terrorist attacks on the mainland soil of the United States. Why don't we talk about 2016 though? How many has it been at this point now? Should we get rid of cars because people have accidents that kill babies? Its dishonest because it tries to compare two things that have nothing to do with one another.
Click to expand...

You simply call people who link statements of fact dishonest when you don't like what they say.

I'm sorry but the liar liar pants on fire defence wore thin on this sub forum some time ago :roll:
 
flogger said:
Only for those who choose not to see it

Sorry if I spoiled another group hug thread :(
Click to expand...

You didn't spoil anything, you reinforced the reality people like yourself are thoroughly dishonest on the matter of guns.
 
flogger said:
You simply call people who link statements of fact dishonest when you don't like what they say.

I'm sorry but the liar liar pants on fire defence wore thin on this sub forum some time ago :roll:
Click to expand...

So I see that you can't refute anything that I said. What a surprise.
 
_Sal said:
no, really it is interesting

I love stats

so more people die from hot tap water than what?
Click to expand...

Than babies shooting someone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom