• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Okay. I had to share thiw with everyone for a good laugh

Don't be asinine, it is not possible to prove somebody will not do something. Did you not take math? Hiliary has shown a pathological dislike of firearms it is only natural to assume if she could a ban would be her wish and she has stated so.

It's not possible to prove that somebody WILL do something either.

So, you have asinine back.
 
How many milliseconds is your memory good for? Again. Convicted felons are in prison. They are not allowed to have guns in prison.

WTF is a known terrorist doing running around for, arrest them. Sheez

This looks like fear showing all over the place. Paranoia actually.

Convicted felons, once paroled - remain convicted felons. That's why they have trouble getting jobs and are supposed to have guns, ya'know, stuff like that.
 
Convicted felons, once paroled - remain convicted felons. That's why they have trouble getting jobs and are supposed to have guns, ya'know, stuff like that.

If they are too dangerous to own firearms, why are they out on the street? Are we talking all of some convicted felons?
 
It's not possible to prove that somebody WILL do something either.

So, you have asinine back.

You base what you believe she will do on past actions, statements and what those that speak for her say. Kind of how you feel about convicted felons who have served their time owning firearms....
 
If they are too dangerous to own firearms, why are they out on the street? Are we talking all of some convicted felons?

Their prison would be up if they were out on the street, right?... I mean, well, that's what happens when they serve their prescribed prison sentence, right" But under the law, they remain convicted felons. I mean, gee Mr. Wizard, I thought you'd know that by now.

So, should convicted felons be able to purchase guns? Terrorists maybe too?
 
Their prison would be up if they were out on the street, right?... I mean, well, that's what happens when they serve their prescribed prison sentence, right" But under the law, they remain convicted felons. I mean, gee Mr. Wizard, I thought you'd know that by now.

So, should convicted felons be able to purchase guns? Terrorists maybe too?


Many people believe those convicted of non-violent felonies-upon completion of their sentence, should be able to own firearms. I don't have an issue with that opinion. If they can vote, they should be able to own guns If they are too dangerous to own firearms, they shouldn't be out of jail in the first place
 
Their prison would be up if they were out on the street, right?... I mean, well, that's what happens when they serve their prescribed prison sentence, right" But under the law, they remain convicted felons. I mean, gee Mr. Wizard, I thought you'd know that by now.

So, should convicted felons be able to purchase guns? Terrorists maybe too?

Once again, all felons or certain felons. Should felons deemed too dangerous to own firearms be allowed to walk free? If so, it is not a firearm problem, it is a legal system stupidity problem. What about those non-violent felons? As far as terrorists go, if someone is legally determined to be a terrorist threat, why are they not in prison. Kind of stupid to let them walk free correct? Of course you could always just assume all Muslims are terrorists. I prefer the old innocent until proven guilty though that might not suit your meme.
 
Once again, all felons or certain felons. Should felons deemed too dangerous to own firearms be allowed to walk free? If so, it is not a firearm problem, it is a legal system stupidity problem. What about those non-violent felons? As far as terrorists go, if someone is legally determined to be a terrorist threat, why are they not in prison. Kind of stupid to let them walk free correct? Of course you could always just assume all Muslims are terrorists. I prefer the old innocent until proven guilty though that might not suit your meme.

Felons convicted of violent offenses. As for terrorists, there are plenty who are on the watch lists.
 
Felons convicted of violent offenses. As for terrorists, there are plenty who are on the watch lists.

Ted Kennedy was on that watch list too btw. If someone can be legally shown to be a terroristic threat np. Otherwise, in this country at least, due process is an equally important right.
 
Ted Kennedy was on that watch list too btw. If someone can be legally shown to be a terroristic threat np. Otherwise, in this country at least, due process is an equally important right.

Lots of Bannerrhoids would put NRA members or Trump supporters on a terrorist watch list if they could. We have seen several Bannerrhoids say the NRA is a terrorist organization. That is why we need due process. given the deceit and spite we have seen from Cankles and her husband, I would bet they'd like to do that to anyone who opposes their crime family
 
Felons convicted of violent offenses. As for terrorists, there are plenty who are on the watch lists.

Released felons are not felons but FREE CITIZENS once their debt to society is paid. Do you have no idea how the justice system works? If they are so dangerous then that is a justice problem not some idiotic make my job easier blanket law. Truly it is idiotic to suppose that such a person cannot obtain a firearm and to even more idiotically think denial of a legal source will rehabilitate them. That is what prison is supposed to do.

The same goes for so-called terrorists..... Either you are and you have your day in court or not. Government just waned an open door to spy on people without any due process.
 
Ted Kennedy was on that watch list too btw. If someone can be legally shown to be a terroristic threat np. Otherwise, in this country at least, due process is an equally important right.

Then if Ted Kennedy showed up to buy a gun and was denied, he's have to work it out. THAT'S how it ought to be.
 
Released felons are not felons but FREE CITIZENS once their debt to society is paid. Do you have no idea how the justice system works? If they are so dangerous then that is a justice problem not some idiotic make my job easier blanket law. Truly it is idiotic to suppose that such a person cannot obtain a firearm and to even more idiotically think denial of a legal source will rehabilitate them. That is what prison is supposed to do.

The same goes for so-called terrorists..... Either you are and you have your day in court or not. Government just waned an open door to spy on people without any due process.

Big Lebowski.jpg
 
Then if Ted Kennedy showed up to buy a gun and was denied, he's have to work it out. THAT'S how it ought to be.

How come you continue living in the US when there are so many countries that could give you all you want right now?
 
As usual you make claims you know nothing about and false at that. So tell us what will depriving a released felon of a legal firearm do to reduce crime? How does it work?

Your post was convoluted and ridiculous. I age it the response it was due.

Recidivism for gun related crimes goes down. Felons are currently not allowed to possess firearms. The same should hold true for people on the terrorist watch list until the emergency situation passes.
 
How come you continue living in the US when there are so many countries that could give you all you want right now?

Well, since my family is a founding one, I thought it would be a good idea.
 
Then if Ted Kennedy showed up to buy a gun and was denied, he's have to work it out. THAT'S how it ought to be.

Then you need to change the 5A. You can only deny a right or freedom AFTER showing due process. Better idea that I have no major concerns with would be flagging a purchase by someone on the watch list for observation. Get far more useful Intel if someone is actually part of a cell.
 
Your post was convoluted and ridiculous. I age it the response it was due.

Recidivism for gun related crimes goes down. Felons are currently not allowed to possess firearms. The same should hold true for people on the terrorist watch list until the emergency situation passes.

Carry on I specifically asked HOW DOES IT WORKS. You neglected that deliberately because you don't know and it does not work.

What emergency situation? How can it possibly be an emergency or situation when Obama invites them in? If they need to be on a watch list and are being punished without due process that is unconstitutional.

Your claim is pure unadulterated crap until you can show how it works.

Apparently you don't care about citizens well being and government can do what it wants to in secret.

Maybe we should have a list of deranged people who believe gun control works.
 
Last edited:
Well, since my family is a founding one, I thought it would be a good idea.

But you could be so much happier in some gun control paradise.
 
It's not possible to prove that somebody WILL do something either.

So, you have asinine back.

Nope you forget it was you who made the claim. I have made no such claim and you can neither prove or quote it. I refuted this asinine claim of yours previously why are you still using it? Don't you think that is dishonest?
 
Nah, then he would just be another Brit on the DP crying about our rights and why we shouldn't have them.

For people who live in fear of people when they get what they want, a criminals paradise and crime increases they move on to some peaceful place. Because crime can never be stopped the first thing they notice is the lax gun control laws.... These rotten apples are the scourge of the earth.
 
Your post was convoluted and ridiculous. I age it the response it was due.

Recidivism for gun related crimes goes down. Felons are currently not allowed to possess firearms. The same should hold true for people on the terrorist watch list until the emergency situation passes.


The idiotic garbage you posted got the best I could do with it. I have no doubt you think it was brilliant logical reasoning but believe me it is total crap.

On reading it I asked myself, WTF does this meaningless garbage actually mean It's one above kindergarten babble. There is absolutely no substance to any of your claims and nobody on this earth can see why any of them should happen or why they would happen. It's pie in the sky kids fantasy play. I must accord with that mind movie you have going.

Let me show you what I mean from the crap you presented.

Recidivism for gun related crimes goes down.

Why will it? How will this mystical reason work. Is this some how related to something? What?

Felons are currently not allowed to possess firearms

Firearms in prison for prisoners is not a good idea but they are simply denied firearms their constitutional right still exists. What of it?

I have to assume since it is not stated that you think some how this is an impediment to somebody willing to break the law. Can you explain how whatever it is works?

I see no shortage of released felons being able to obtain a firearm from their normal sources. What prevents them from obtaining a firearm in any of a multitude of ways? It is common cause criminals can get what they want. Are you aware of that? Should I mention not preventing that which neither you or government can will not stop people determined to obtain a firearm. The impact on crime has proven time and again to be zero. Did you know that?

The same should hold true for people on the terrorist watch list until the emergency situation passes.

Should? What should based on what success? Have you proven this claimed success? Where?

People on a watch list!!!!! Are you nuts, who decided they need to be on a watch list? Who empowered these oppressive goons giving them the power to try, judge and convict without due process? Which part of the constitution allows this?

Never the less do tell how will denial of somebody on the watch list a legal purchase make the slightest impact?

So you see your babbling is meaningless until you explain how it works and why it will work. Something no gun control advocate has ever done. Please be the first.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom